This site requires new users to accept that a small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk after requesting a new account. Thank you.

 Moderated by: chrisbet, Page:  First Page Previous Page  ...  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  ...  Next Page Last Page  
Using AI in photography   -   Page   10
General discussion and graham's youtube film  Rating:  Rating
AuthorPost



Posted: Sun Nov 5th, 2023 21:44
 
91st Post
chrisbet



Joined: Thu Feb 7th, 2019
Location: Leigh On Sea, Essex , United Kingdom
Posts: 1498
Status: 
Offline
Eric wrote:
Chris…would it be worthwhile incorporating the use of AI into the heading for this thread? Or moving the AI related posts to a new thread?

This current ‘viral’ subject and Grahams hard work are perhaps being missed by visitors when in this general ‘Correcting photos in PS’ title.

In fact only the first post was about correcting distortion so a change in title might be easier

I agree - quite often the topic wanders off in a different if related direction - I have retitled the topic.



____________________
If it is broken it was probably me ....
 




Posted: Mon Nov 6th, 2023 21:29
 
92nd Post
Graham Whistler



Joined: Fri Apr 13th, 2012
Location: Fareham, United Kingdom
Posts: 1926
Status: 
Offline
This is NOT a photograph. Another pure AI created from a clear white canvas with a few written "generate" a wild seascape with rocks etc about 5 min work to create this.

Click here to comment on this image.



____________________
Graham Whistler
 




Posted: Tue Nov 7th, 2023 07:56
 
93rd Post
chrisbet



Joined: Thu Feb 7th, 2019
Location: Leigh On Sea, Essex , United Kingdom
Posts: 1498
Status: 
Offline
Now you have lost me - why? There is no skill involved in creating it and where did it "steal" the bits of the image from? The EXIF gives it away - no camera, lens or exposure information.



____________________
If it is broken it was probably me ....
 




Posted: Tue Nov 7th, 2023 10:00
 
94th Post
Graham Whistler



Joined: Fri Apr 13th, 2012
Location: Fareham, United Kingdom
Posts: 1926
Status: 
Offline
Chris, it just generates what you ask it to do. I do not know where the info comes from. Again This is NOT a photograph but is now generated in the latest Photoshop version 25.1 so the Beta Photoshop features have now almost fully been added. This was again written in a simple few words on a blank selected canvas: " Seascape with rough water and rocks" On the same new bar at the bottom of the picture click the right-hand box to generate.  (If this new box gets in your way it is easy to move it.)

Click here to comment on this image.



____________________
Graham Whistler
 




Posted: Tue Nov 7th, 2023 10:09
 
95th Post
chrisbet



Joined: Thu Feb 7th, 2019
Location: Leigh On Sea, Essex , United Kingdom
Posts: 1498
Status: 
Offline
Hmmm - ask it to generate "BMC B series conrod and piston with broken top ring" :lol:



____________________
If it is broken it was probably me ....
 




Posted: Tue Nov 7th, 2023 10:30
 
96th Post
Graham Whistler



Joined: Fri Apr 13th, 2012
Location: Fareham, United Kingdom
Posts: 1926
Status: 
Offline
Chris that took 30 sec what fun!!!!

Click here to comment on this image.



____________________
Graham Whistler
 




Posted: Tue Nov 7th, 2023 10:31
 
97th Post
Graham Whistler



Joined: Fri Apr 13th, 2012
Location: Fareham, United Kingdom
Posts: 1926
Status: 
Offline
Or autumn trees on a hillside?

Click here to comment on this image.



____________________
Graham Whistler
 




Posted: Tue Nov 7th, 2023 10:49
 
98th Post
chrisbet



Joined: Thu Feb 7th, 2019
Location: Leigh On Sea, Essex , United Kingdom
Posts: 1498
Status: 
Offline
ROFL :lol:- not so intelligent - absolutely nothing like the real thing!!!




Click here to comment on this image.



____________________
If it is broken it was probably me ....
 




Posted: Tue Nov 7th, 2023 14:07
 
99th Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4529
Status: 
Offline
Ok…because I know Graham will be doing a talk/workshop on Photoshop AI, I’m going to be a bit nit picking to help in his pros and cons.

Firstly the crashing sea and the ‘cartoon’ man on the rocks.

There are 3 or 4 things that disturb me with this images. 
The Beluga whale like wave crashing into the mid distant rocks with no spray.
The strange choice of figure on the rocks …it doesn’t look real let alone realistic.
The white (sharpening?) halo around high contrast edges….is it selecting low res files and trying to make them bigger and better?
I am uncomfortable with the sea transitions. The tide in the middle foreground seems to be a different energy to the water by the rocks on the right. 
The mid distant sea just looks to yet another energy level to the rest of the water. It looks like a merged version of several images???

In the sunset image…

Here again there is a halo around high contrast edges???
It may be a single image but I am again disturbed by what seems like disjoined energy in the water. It’s almost as though it’s two images at different shutter speeds and merged.
And what’s going on with those 3 black rocks above mid rocks? They don’t look real?


Autumn trees on a hillside….

I thought that was quite good apart from yet again ….halos, the 3 strange periscopes and the black ‘Sanskrit like’ marks to the left of the main rock?/


Apart from image ownership, what is the difference in asking PS to provide such an image, as opposed to asking google to do the same same?
Are Adobe just gathering royalty free images and merging where necessary?




Click here to comment on this image.



____________________
Eric
 




Posted: Tue Nov 7th, 2023 14:36
 
100th Post
Graham Whistler



Joined: Fri Apr 13th, 2012
Location: Fareham, United Kingdom
Posts: 1926
Status: 
Offline
Eric is quite right and the Goldfinch proved this on day one. The images I have just posted are no better even if you spent hours retouching them, the res is still low and I gave them a good-sized canvas to work with. It still stands the quality of the REAL photo image is still way in front. Let's hope there will be a need for a human-skilled photographer for years to come.



____________________
Graham Whistler
 

Reply
1st new
This is topic ID = 1861     Current time is 14:14 Page:  First Page Previous Page  ...  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  ...  Next Page Last Page    
Nikon DSLR Forums > The Image Processing and Editing Forums > Software for Image Processing > Using AI in photography Top

Users viewing this topic

Post quick reply

Go to top
Go to end
Messages
Home
Recent topics
Unread posts
Last posts
Splash

Current theme is Modern editor



A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk Thank you.


Hosted by Octarine Services

UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.1140 seconds (76% database + 24% PHP). 81 queries executed.