| Moderated by: chrisbet, | Page: 1 2 3   |
|
|||||||
| Adobe releases ACR 6.7 - Page 1 | |
| Rate Topic |
| Author | Post |
|---|
| Posted: Thu May 3rd, 2012 13:46 |
|
1st Post |
TomOC
|
This will be the final release that will work with PS 5 It DOES include D4, D800 and D800e It Does NOT include Fuji xpro-1 Available for download from within the app. Cheers, Tom
____________________ Tom O'Connell -Lots of people talk to animals.... Not very many listen, though.... That's the problem. Benjamin Hoff, The Tao of Pooh |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Thu May 3rd, 2012 15:04 |
|
2nd Post |
jk
|
Thanks Tom. Sent info to Robert Levy but forgot to post to everyone!  So now those of us who have the Fuji XP1 will have to shell out for CS6 or use the workaround with Lightroom 4 that Rich pointed out. Why do I feel cheated by this again! Thanks Adobe.... Not!
____________________ Still learning after all these years! https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Thu May 3rd, 2012 18:26 |
|
3rd Post |
Robert
|
As heads up, I have just installed the Adobe Design Standard suite CS5 on my Mac mini i7. Having installed I ran the updaters. ACR 6.7 was installed. So anybody wanting ACR6.7 should be able to upgrade even CS5 without HAVING to go to CS6.
____________________ Robert. |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Thu May 3rd, 2012 20:09 |
|
4th Post |
TomOC
|
jk wrote:Thanks Tom. I'm no adobe fan any more, but to be fair... The blame, if there is blame, is on Fuji for not working closely enough with adobe to get it in the existing version. You can be sure that must have had something to do with NIkon's timing of the D4 and D800? I'm going to be spending some time working with trial apps like Phase One Capture and Aperture 3 as alternatives to adobe... If they don't cut it, I'll pay the blackmail just for ACR. Tom
____________________ Tom O'Connell -Lots of people talk to animals.... Not very many listen, though.... That's the problem. Benjamin Hoff, The Tao of Pooh |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Thu May 3rd, 2012 23:00 |
|
5th Post |
rlevy
|
Thanks All. Downloading 6.7 as we type. RL
____________________ RL robertl594@aol.com http://www.pbase.com/robertl594 |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Sat May 5th, 2012 00:30 |
|
6th Post |
richw
|
TomOC wrote:jk wrote: Just get Lightroom, basically you can view this as just the ACR, although it comes with a lot extra.
|
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Sat May 5th, 2012 03:43 |
|
7th Post |
TomOC
|
Rich- I have two problems with lightroom (I had LR 3 with my Leica x1 and gave it away). 1- It forces you to make huge catalogs which I don't need or want since I catalog everything with Media Pro. 2- I couldn't see that it did anything that PS didn't do and I have literally dozens of plugins for PS and a very established workflow. For me Bridge is a better viewer since it just views the files and leaves them in place. As to ACR, my problem is that 6.7 does not support Fuji xpro-1 and that is killing me. I also have lately waited 6 months to upgrade any adobe product on a mac. The last two upgrades were initial disasters in the first release. I may have to reacant that practice for now. My real dream would be for adobe to sell ACR as a standalone/plugin. I would gladly pay for ACR. That said... There HAS to be something I'm missing with LR. Doug has been saying the same thing and i respect the opinion of both of you, but I just can't see it on this one... Please ... Convince me  Cheers, Tom
____________________ Tom O'Connell -Lots of people talk to animals.... Not very many listen, though.... That's the problem. Benjamin Hoff, The Tao of Pooh |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Sat May 5th, 2012 03:54 |
|
8th Post |
Doug
|
TomOC wrote:
Everyone is different in their needs and expectations so I'd have to see your existing workflow to work out where and how Lightroom would benefit you, but I'm sure it can (I have one client who imports jobs into Lightroom, works on them and pushes through to Photoshop for further editing, then removes from Lightroom before the cycle starts again) Do you adjust White Balance? Do you Crop? Do you rename? Do you convert to different formats? While Bridge can do all of these things, Lightroom is faster and less clunky with better shortcuts BECAUSE the photos are in it's catalog Of course all that assumes that you can and want to use ACR for raw processing, but from your post above it does seem that way
____________________ Recent & Popular posts ProCapture | Genius on Demand Blog |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Sat May 5th, 2012 06:39 |
|
9th Post |
richw
|
If all you wanted was ACR then you could delete the photos, but why is the catalogue an issue? I have 64,000 images in mine and even with backups the space taken on my hard drive at current prices costs less than a dollar.
|
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Sat May 5th, 2012 10:18 |
|
10th Post |
Robert
|
That was the point I was trying to make above, rather less eloquently. HD space is so cheap nowadays, why constrain your choices for a few Gb?
____________________ Robert. |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| This is topic ID = 132 Current time is 03:23 | Page: 1 2 3 | |
| Nikon DSLR Forums > The Image Processing and Editing Forums > Software for Image Processing > Adobe releases ACR 6.7 | Top | |
Users viewing this topic |
||
Current theme is Modern editor
| A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk Thank you. |
Hosted by Octarine Services
UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0685 seconds (61% database + 39% PHP). 84 queries executed.
UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0685 seconds (61% database + 39% PHP). 84 queries executed.