This site requires new users to accept that a small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk after requesting a new account. Thank you.

 Moderated by: chrisbet, Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  ...  Next Page Last Page  
Mac or ?   -   Page   2
 Rate Topic 
AuthorPost



Posted: Mon Jul 2nd, 2012 09:39
 
11th Post
Dave Groen



Joined: Wed Apr 4th, 2012
Location: St Louis, Missouri USA
Posts: 106
Status: 
Offline
Robert wrote: I find page swiping so natural and convenient, I am bewildered why it isn't implemented on the iPad..
This kind of page swiping is implemented in iOS 5. Quoting from Apple...

iOS 5 includes a few new moves and shortcuts to help you get around even quicker on your iPad: Using four or five fingers, swipe up to reveal the multitasking bar, pinch to return to the Home screen, and swipe left or right to switch between apps
.

Is this what you want to do?



____________________
I started out with nothing and still have most of it left
 




Posted: Mon Jul 2nd, 2012 10:27
 
12th Post
Robert



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
Thanks Dave, no they have missed the most important one, swiping between pages two fingers, sideways swipe.

I can't imagine swiping between applications???

Why have an instant and casual way to switch applications, if I were working in one application, I want a positive, distinct and unmistakable way to change to another.

If Apple persist with this silliness somebody like TinkerTool will step in and provide a solution, unless I am missing something...

My understanding is Apple are supposed to be making the interface as similar as possible across all devices. To me that includes natural gestures like swiping from page to page and month to month.



____________________
Robert.

 




Posted: Mon Jul 2nd, 2012 11:51
 
13th Post
Dave Groen



Joined: Wed Apr 4th, 2012
Location: St Louis, Missouri USA
Posts: 106
Status: 
Offline
Back on topic...

I am also ready to buy a new Mac in the near future. Robert pointed me towards the Mac mini, but if I want to use my current 30" monitor I need a $99 Dual-link DVI adapter. Minis are 2.5GHz dual-core i5 ($800), or 2.0GHz quad-core i7 for the server ($1000), + keyboard, +mouse, +trackpad)

I could instead get a 27" iMac with 3.1GHz Quad-Core Intel Core i5 for $2000 with monitor, keyboard, trackpad, leave the 30" connected to my Mac Pro Quad G5 and use this old computer for my PowerPC-only software. I just want to run Photoshop and Lightroom on the new one (%*@^# giant D800 files!)

I think the new minis and iMac are roughly the same in performance, much faster than my G5 box.

Any enlightening counterpoints from the peanut gallery?



____________________
I started out with nothing and still have most of it left
 




Posted: Mon Jul 2nd, 2012 11:58
 
14th Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6987
Status: 
Online
I would go for a top end iMac and leave your old setup alive and working.
Of course if you buy the Mac Mini server then a nice Thunderbolt display makes it a very up-market piece of kit as it can then do 2540x1600.



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Mon Jul 2nd, 2012 12:21
 
15th Post
Robert



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
I agree Dave, it's an individual choice depending on your needs and circumstances.

Depends if you already have a monitor, I have two 24" screens hooked up to my Mac mini's which from my point of view give me more screen real estate than the 27" iMac or the Thunderbolt screen, for peanuts. I think I paid about £130 each for the 24" screens, OK they are not top quality and not even LED but they do what I need well enough.

That was why I went with the Mac mini, plus the portability. A 27" iMac os not portable. The iMacs are very heavy. I just installed one about a month ago for a friend and by the time I had carried it about half a mile out of the shopping centre and across two car parks my arms were aching. The iMac was very nice to use though!



____________________
Robert.

 




Posted: Mon Jul 2nd, 2012 14:47
 
16th Post
Squarerigger



Joined: Wed Apr 4th, 2012
Location: Goose Creek, South Carolina USA
Posts: 418
Status: 
Offline
Robert wrote:
I agree Dave, it's an individual choice depending on your needs and circumstances.

Depends if you already have a monitor, I have two 24" screens hooked up to my Mac mini's which from my point of view give me more screen real estate than the 27" iMac or the Thunderbolt screen, for peanuts. I think I paid about £130 each for the 24" screens, OK they are not top quality and not even LED but they do what I need well enough.

That was why I went with the Mac mini, plus the portability. A 27" iMac os not portable. The iMacs are very heavy. I just installed one about a month ago for a friend and by the time I had carried it about half a mile out of the shopping centre and across two car parks my arms were aching. The iMac was very nice to use though!


Robert, you should have let "cloud" transport it to the car. :rofl:

I have an old iMac and love it. I will probably replace it when the iMac's are introduced this year. I have no need for portability.

It has been a long time since they put out a new iMac - well beyond Apples usual time frame.



____________________
--------------------------------------------
Gary
 




Posted: Mon Jul 2nd, 2012 17:19
 
17th Post
Robert



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
Squarerigger wrote:

It has been a long time since they put out a new iMac - well beyond Apples usual time frame.


I haven't been following the new iMac releases closely but afaik the last upgrade was the introduction of Thunderbolt, I don't think you will see many new innovative changes with the next model except perhaps USB3 and no CD/DVD drive with the option of a SSD (Solid State Drive) instead as well as the normal HD.

The SSD would be good and provides an almost instant start up, with fast application launch and a generally crisper performance. In contrast to Apples apparent 'rip off' prices for their RAM, their pricing structure for SSD's seems to be very competitive compared with third party suppliers.

It will of course include Mountain Lion*, which is worth the upgrade alone!

* Scheduled for July release.



____________________
Robert.

 




Posted: Tue Jul 3rd, 2012 00:09
 
18th Post
TomOC



Joined: Wed Apr 11th, 2012
Location: Sausalito, California USA
Posts: 616
Status: 
Offline
Ed- It was the iphone that made it a no brainer for many.

You will not believe how cool it is to have the iphone and your mac sync without any effort or glitch or anything.... iCloud just does it immediately for contacts, calendar, and email... It is better than corporate networks by a mile.. And it is just you :-)

Tom

PS - I agree with Doug on the keypad/trackpad/magic mouse layout... Actually I use the trackpad very little - the magic mouse does a lot of the gestures that are the bit uptick for me



____________________
Tom O'Connell

-Lots of people talk to animals.... Not very many listen, though.... That's the problem.

Benjamin Hoff, The Tao of Pooh
 




Posted: Tue Jul 3rd, 2012 01:00
 
19th Post
Robert



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
I dislike the Magic Mouse intensely! I have one but Michael uses and loves it?

My dislike stems from the unexpected leaping about of the screen image in such applications as Google Earth, or when viewing images in Lightroom caused by simply handling and using the MM. inadvertently touching the MM in the sensitive area can cause unexpected, unintended and very annoying results, for me.

As I say, Michael loves it, and keeps it well away from my desk! ;-) He even puts it away in it's little 'glass' case every night.

I keep a conventional wired mouse attached to Michaels computer in case I need to use it or need to show him something.



____________________
Robert.

 




Posted: Tue Jul 3rd, 2012 15:22
 
20th Post
Robert



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
When I wrote that I didn't expect any significant technical updates to the iMac range although, in the back of my mind I wondered if... then dismissed the idea as silly!

But...

Interesting News item...



JK, or anybody will you please remind me what the syntax is for a discrete URL? I have done them here but forgotten how. SORTED!



Mmmmm May have sorted the URL but not the [d] code :diggingahole: :rtfm: o.O :wtf:



____________________
Robert.

 

Reply
1st new
This is topic ID = 242     Current time is 08:18 Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  ...  Next Page Last Page    
Nikon DSLR Forums > Computer Hardware for Digital Photography. Computers, OS, Scanners, etc. > Hardware for Image Processing > Mac or ? Top

Users viewing this topic

Post quick reply

Go to top
Go to end
Messages
Home
Recent topics
Unread posts
Last posts
Splash

Current theme is Modern editor



A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk Thank you.


Hosted by Octarine Services

UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0807 seconds (70% database + 30% PHP). 85 queries executed.