This site requires new users to accept that a small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk after requesting a new account. Thank you.

 Moderated by: chrisbet, Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2  3  4  Next Page Last Page  
Incident light meters   -   Page   3
 Rating:  Rating
AuthorPost



Posted: Sat May 1st, 2021 04:22
 
21st Post
GeoffR

 

Joined: Wed Apr 11th, 2012
Location: Denham, United Kingdom
Posts: 301
Status: 
Offline
May I put this another way?
The light falling on a subject is not affected by the colour, reflectivity or any other property of the subject.
The light reflected by the subject is affected by all these things.

An example a black cat on a dark background. The light falling on the cat suggests an exposure of 1/250 at f8 the camera suggests 1/60 at f8. Now replace the cat with a white one, the incident reading remains 1/250 at f8 the camera suggests 1/1000 at f8.

Use the camera readings and you get a grey cat on a grey background or a grey cat on a very dark background. Use the incident readings and the cats come out the correct shade, black or white.

The thing is that none of these exposures is "correct" but one of them will achieve the desired result.

 




Posted: Sat May 1st, 2021 05:55
 
22nd Post
chrisbet



Joined: Thu Feb 7th, 2019
Location: Leigh On Sea, Essex , United Kingdom
Posts: 1518
Status: 
Offline
Or - as I now think I understand it - the camera thinks everything it sees should be mid grey and adjusts accordingly which is fine if you want a mid grey image!

I have given up with the meter and can't run around a moving horse with an incident light meter so I take best guess and adjust manually until I get the result I want - fixing ISO at a suitable value to minimise noise and juggling aperture and exposure time depending on DOF / blur - thank goodness for digital I can take several images to choose the best from.

Maybe this is where an EVF scores because you can see the result of settings continuously - at least you can with my Canon XL1S, is that true for the mirrorless cameras?



____________________
If it is broken it was probably me ....
 




Posted: Sat May 1st, 2021 11:28
 
23rd Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6987
Status: 
Offline
chrisbet wrote:
Or - as I now think I understand it - the camera thinks everything it sees should be mid grey and adjusts accordingly which is fine if you want a mid grey image!

That is good.  Correctly understood.  But when you know which zones (Ansel Adams Zone System) each colour falls then it works great for everything.












I have given up with the meter and can't run around a moving horse with an incident light meter so I take best guess and adjust manually until I get the result I want - fixing ISO at a suitable value to minimise noise and juggling aperture and exposure time depending on DOF / blur - thank goodness for digital I can take several images to choose the best from.


Yes but you just need to read once as long as the light doesn't change e.g. goes behind a cloud.













Maybe this is where an EVF scores because you can see the result of settings continuously - at least you can with my Canon XL1S, is that true for the mirrorless cameras?

Yes this is the huge advantage of a mirrorless camera with EVF that shows Exposure Preview (e.g. Nikon, Fuji, Sony, etc) and not just an electronic viewfinder as in many bridge cameras or the TFT back screen.   I needs to show in WYSIWYG mode!



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Sat May 1st, 2021 11:29
 
24th Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6987
Status: 
Offline
@Chrisbet   Haha...  This is why we need in line quotes in post!



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Sat May 1st, 2021 11:43
 
25th Post
chrisbet



Joined: Thu Feb 7th, 2019
Location: Leigh On Sea, Essex , United Kingdom
Posts: 1518
Status: 
Offline
Ya - boo - sorted it :lol:



____________________
If it is broken it was probably me ....
 




Posted: Sat May 1st, 2021 11:47
 
26th Post
chrisbet



Joined: Thu Feb 7th, 2019
Location: Leigh On Sea, Essex , United Kingdom
Posts: 1518
Status: 
Offline
Yes but you just need to read once as long as the light doesn't change e.g. goes behind a cloud.
This is a constant problem in the manege for most of the day as one half is always in sun and the other in shade.



____________________
If it is broken it was probably me ....
 




Posted: Sun May 2nd, 2021 14:15
 
27th Post
Iain



Joined: Thu Apr 5th, 2012
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Posts: 1487
Status: 
Offline
Having done sports photography for so long I have got into the habit of using the grass to set my exposure if the light is consistent.

 




Posted: Sun May 2nd, 2021 16:15
 
28th Post
Robert



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
Well my approach is boringly simple, while I am waiting for the 'main event' I bang off a few exposures at different exposure values, of the area I intend to photograph and assess the histogram to check it isn't climbing the wall at either side of the scale. Nicely in the middle.

If I get it wrong I use levels in PS to put it right, although a correct exposure in the first place is better of course because correcting it in Ps means stretching the light values and loosing some range of shades.



____________________
Robert.

 




Posted: Mon May 3rd, 2021 23:11
 
29th Post
novicius



Joined: Sun Aug 12th, 2012
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 445
Status: 
Offline
Robert wrote:
Well my approach is boringly simple, while I am waiting for the 'main event' I bang off a few exposures at different exposure values, of the area I intend to photograph and assess the histogram to check it isn't climbing the wall at either side of the scale. Nicely in the middle.

If I get it wrong I use levels in PS to put it right, although a correct exposure in the first place is better of course because correcting it in Ps means stretching the light values and loosing some range of shades.

That`s the way I do it,..and yet , I still have the lunasix F with me...old habits persevere I guess..



____________________
Back in Danmark

I do not use my equipment to make photo`s .. I take photo`s to use my equipment

The better I become at photography,the better my camera gets.
 




Posted: Tue May 4th, 2021 06:13
 
30th Post
GeoffR

 

Joined: Wed Apr 11th, 2012
Location: Denham, United Kingdom
Posts: 301
Status: 
Offline
"I have given up with the meter and can't run around a moving horse with an incident light meter"
You don't actually need to get near the horse, as long as it isn't in shadow the same light intensity will be falling 6' away or further. Just hold the meter pointing over your shoulder when you are facing the subject, don't cast your own shadow over the meter.

 

Reply
1st new
This is topic ID = 1894     Current time is 05:25 Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2  3  4  Next Page Last Page    
Nikon DSLR Forums > Light, Lighting Techniques, Strobes and LEDs Forums > Lighting > Incident light meters Top

Users viewing this topic

Post quick reply

Go to top
Go to end
Messages
Home
Recent topics
Unread posts
Last posts
Splash

Current theme is Modern editor



A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk Thank you.


Hosted by Octarine Services

UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0617 seconds (67% database + 33% PHP). 83 queries executed.