This site requires new users to accept that a small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk after requesting a new account. Thank you.

 Moderated by: chrisbet, Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2   
All about VR.   -   Page   2
 Rating:  Rating
AuthorPost



Posted: Fri Oct 25th, 2013 04:48
 
11th Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4572
Status: 
Offline
amazing50 wrote:
amazing50 wrote: I've been using VR at high shutter speeds, maybe thats the problem with my 24-120 being a bit off at infinity.

I went back to Elora and reshot the church from about the same position only this time I used a tripod, removed the UV filter used live view, manual focus with the magnifier and turned off the VR.

The result was better than expected. The f/3.5 24-120 is not a problem on the D600. 


Good job.

I am wondering if VR really stands for 'variable results'?



____________________
Eric
 




Posted: Fri Oct 25th, 2013 08:29
 
12th Post
amazing50

 

Joined: Thu Apr 12th, 2012
Location: Kitchener, Ontario Canada
Posts: 571
Status: 
Offline
jk wrote:
So of all the things you changed from the original did you manage to work out if it was one or many items that were causing the lack of sharpness.

Was it:....

VR
UV filter
Manual focus
AF
Dodgy eyes.


The original shot was AF and I used the magnifier and MF on the follow up shots and a tripod. The first follow up shot was with the VR and it was lacking sharpness even at 1/750 sec. For now I'll not be using VR except in low light situations where it has proven to be useful. This will also extend my battery life somewhat.

I will be doing some tests on the UV filter etc. time and weather permitting, We had our first snowfall yesterday;~)

 



____________________
There is nothing worse than a sharp image of a fuzzy concept ;~) Mike Grace
 




Posted: Fri Oct 25th, 2013 12:39
 
13th Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6987
Status: 
Offline
If you have a high quality UV filter and it is clean then I dont expect it to effect the IQ by very much. The VR is probably the most likely problem but every little counts if you want a sharp image.



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Sun Nov 3rd, 2013 01:29
 
14th Post
cab

 

Joined: Tue Oct 15th, 2013
Location: Chesterfield, Derbyshire, United Kingdom
Posts: 8
Status: 
Offline
http://email.nikon.co.uk/Pages/Tips/1310/01/Tip-three.aspx

 

Reply
1st new
This is topic ID = 722     Current time is 03:25 Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2     
Nikon DSLR Forums > Camera and Lens Forums > Lenses > All about VR. Top

Users viewing this topic

Post quick reply

Go to top
Go to end
Messages
Home
Recent topics
Unread posts
Last posts
Splash

Current theme is Modern editor



A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk Thank you.


Hosted by Octarine Services

UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0445 seconds (67% database + 33% PHP). 53 queries executed.