This site requires new users to accept that a small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk after requesting a new account. Thank you.

 Moderated by: chrisbet, Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2  3  4   
To filter or not!   -   Page   4
 Rating:  Rating
AuthorPost



Posted: Thu Oct 10th, 2013 19:04
 
31st Post
amazing50

 

Joined: Thu Apr 12th, 2012
Location: Kitchener, Ontario Canada
Posts: 571
Status: 
Offline
From now on I will have to "clock" the shutter :lol::lol::lol:



____________________
There is nothing worse than a sharp image of a fuzzy concept ;~) Mike Grace
 




Posted: Wed Oct 16th, 2013 13:35
 
32nd Post
cab

 

Joined: Tue Oct 15th, 2013
Location: Chesterfield, Derbyshire, United Kingdom
Posts: 8
Status: 
Offline
Hi I am a newbie , back to the filter issue I used to use 35mm slrs many moons ago and always used UV .Then Hoya was the preferred brand, what I would like to know is there a cheaper brand that is as good. Just getting back into Photography and cant afford everything I want at once.

thanks in advance

 




Posted: Wed Oct 16th, 2013 13:51
 
33rd Post
blackfox



Joined: Wed Apr 11th, 2012
Location: Flint, North Wales, United Kingdom
Posts: 1251
Status: 
Offline
the only time i would consider using one is either for special effects i.e star ,polariser etc .or if doing seashore shots where salt spray is a problem ,other than that totally useless in digital and will 90% of the time degrade your image .

i once had to bollock a mate of mine that spent £1300 on a lens and £2.50 for a filter off e/bay .if you feel you must use one GENUINE hoya pro 1 are good but carry a hefty price tag o.O

 




Posted: Wed Oct 16th, 2013 14:24
 
34th Post
cab

 

Joined: Tue Oct 15th, 2013
Location: Chesterfield, Derbyshire, United Kingdom
Posts: 8
Status: 
Offline
thanks for the quick reply will look out for a Hoya for the sea side shoots.

 




Posted: Wed Oct 16th, 2013 15:03
 
35th Post
Robert



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
Hi Cab, Welcome to the forum.

As Jeff said, the only FILTER you need is probably a polariser, but I used caps for a reason, If you are considering a UV filter to protect your front element the there is no benefit using a UV filter with digital, just get a plain glass protective 'filter'.

There is already a strong and very effective UV filter built int your camera body, it's directly in front of the sensor, it also filters out IR and prevents moir© from making patterns if you photograph somebody with a striped shirt.

If you are considering colour tinted filters, again they are not needed with digital. In post processing using almost any software you are able to adjust the colour tints easily and revert if you don't like the effect.



____________________
Robert.

 




Posted: Wed Oct 16th, 2013 15:36
 
36th Post
blackfox



Joined: Wed Apr 11th, 2012
Location: Flint, North Wales, United Kingdom
Posts: 1251
Status: 
Offline
you don't need a filter rob you just use dust to protect your lenses :lol::lol::devil::devil:

 




Posted: Wed Oct 16th, 2013 16:00
 
37th Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6987
Status: 
Offline
I always use a filter on all my lenses.
Prefer to take the hit and sharpen a little more.
To each his own but I do agree there is a small degradation of image. My sharpest lenses dont have filters !



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Wed Oct 16th, 2013 16:08
 
38th Post
Robert



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
A few gouges on the front element adds character to the camera! ROFLMAO :devil:



____________________
Robert.

 




Posted: Wed Oct 16th, 2013 16:46
 
39th Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4572
Status: 
Offline
Some years ago, I needed to take some shots of puddle splashing for a range of kids wellies. Got the D3 and a £1200 worth of new 17-35 lens in position then stamped away (boot on hand) to get the lovely splash coronets. So far so good.

Then checkled the camera....few splashes that wiped off. Then the lens..... never wipe off gritty puddle water!!!

Sure the lens scratches don't degrade images....but they don't half degrade the resale value!!



____________________
Eric
 

Reply
1st new
This is topic ID = 696     Current time is 11:31 Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2  3  4     
Nikon DSLR Forums > Camera and Lens Forums > Lenses > To filter or not! Top

Users viewing this topic

Post quick reply

Go to top
Go to end
Messages
Home
Recent topics
Unread posts
Last posts
Splash

Current theme is Modern editor



A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk Thank you.


Hosted by Octarine Services

UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0584 seconds (66% database + 34% PHP). 76 queries executed.