| Moderated by: chrisbet, | Page: 1 2   |
|
|||||||
| New Nikon 70-200 f4 - Page 1 | |
Rating: 
|
| Author | Post |
|---|
| Posted: Tue Feb 12th, 2013 03:55 |
|
1st Post |
jk
|
Has anyone purchased or tested this new lens from Nikon 70-200 f4 AFS VR G. I dont aim to get it as I have the f2.8 version but it seems like a good alternative with modern cameras now able to provide ISO 6400 fairly easily with little noise.
____________________ Still learning after all these years! https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Tue Feb 12th, 2013 04:36 |
|
2nd Post |
Bob Bowen
|
Nikon Mag did a review comparing to the 2.8 version. Stood up well but Pros go for the 2.8. I'm thinking of one to lighten the load as I begin to creak more and with good higher ISO performance nowadays.
____________________ Bob Bowen |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Tue Feb 12th, 2013 05:11 |
|
3rd Post |
Eric
|
Bob Bowen wrote:Nikon Mag did a review comparing to the 2.8 version. Stood up well but Pros go for the 2.8. I'm thinking of one to lighten the load as I begin to creak more and with good higher ISO performance nowadays. Is it that much lighter?
____________________ Eric |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Tue Feb 12th, 2013 06:13 |
|
4th Post |
Squarerigger
|
F2.8 = 1540 grams; f4 = 850 grams
____________________ -------------------------------------------- Gary |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Tue Feb 12th, 2013 06:18 |
|
5th Post |
jk
|
f2.8 version weighs 1540 grams versus f4 version which weighs 850 grams.
____________________ Still learning after all these years! https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Tue Feb 12th, 2013 06:18 |
|
6th Post |
jk
|
 Gary beat me to it!!
____________________ Still learning after all these years! https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Tue Feb 12th, 2013 06:22 |
|
7th Post |
Robert
|
Eric wrote:Bob Bowen wrote: Hi ISO should be much the same weight as Lo ISO? 
____________________ Robert. |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Tue Feb 12th, 2013 06:27 |
|
8th Post |
jk
|
Robert wrote: Eric wrote:Depends on the ISO standard used. Is Hi Beef more dense than Lo Beef ? I understand there is a thing called Hi Horse that is now used in UK food, my Dad did warn me about this hi horse stuff when I was a kid! 
____________________ Still learning after all these years! https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Tue Feb 12th, 2013 07:23 |
|
9th Post |
Robert
|
jk wrote:my Dad did warn me about this hi horse stuff when I was a kid!
____________________ Robert. |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Tue Feb 12th, 2013 10:26 |
|
10th Post |
blackfox
|
YOU GOT IT WRONG NAH NAH NAH NAH  its been found not to be horse at all ,ITS DONKEYS AND MULES 
|
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| This is topic ID = 538 Current time is 05:43 | Page: 1 2 | |
| Nikon DSLR Forums > Camera and Lens Forums > Lenses > New Nikon 70-200 f4 | Top | |
Users viewing this topic |
||
Current theme is Modern editor
| A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk Thank you. |
Hosted by Octarine Services
UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0615 seconds (66% database + 34% PHP). 87 queries executed.
UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0615 seconds (66% database + 34% PHP). 87 queries executed.