This site requires new users to accept that a small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk after requesting a new account. Thank you. |
Moderated by: chrisbet, | Page: ![]() ![]() |
|
Nikon 18-35 f3.5-4.5 AFS zoom   -   Page   2 | |
Rating: ![]() |
Author | Post |
---|
Posted: Wed Jan 30th, 2013 03:29 |
|
11th Post |
Robert![]() ![]()
![]() |
Maybe... When I got my D1 I considered the DX sensor to be a temporary expedient until Nikon figured how to make a proper size sensor. Well they did that with the excellent D3 or D700. I would rather get a good 'old' D3 than a new very high pixel density D400 12 to 15 Meg pixels are plenty in my opinion. The extra large image files and horrid gritty noise I see in these small pixel images puts me right off. I would rather have larger soft pixels more like film grain. Almost all my lenses are FX capable so I am ready to switch any time if the right body comes along. But affording it might be a different matter... ![]()
____________________ Robert. |
||||||||
|
Posted: Wed Jan 30th, 2013 05:16 |
|
12th Post |
Eric![]() ![]()
![]() |
Robert wrote: Maybe... Wonder how the D600 compares to the D3?
____________________ Eric |
||||||||
|
Posted: Wed Jan 30th, 2013 09:11 |
|
13th Post |
jk![]() ![]()
![]() |
I'd say it is probably a little better in the IQ range and the noise will be a little better as well. The D600 should be a small step up from the D3 so maybe the same as a D3S. It does have newer VLSI technology but maybe the higher MP count will dull the effect of the better electronics.
____________________ Still learning after all these years! https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none |
||||||||
|
Posted: Wed Jan 30th, 2013 10:21 |
|
14th Post |
Gilbert Sandberg![]()
![]() |
Eric, re: Wonder how the D600 compares to the D3 Grab hold of these two camera's side by side (or any single-digit D camera), and the D600 feels like a wet piece of cardboard. Regards, Gilbert One point for the D600: Nikon has included an Ai-ring for use of older lenses, but otherwise it is aimed and consumers.
|
||||||||
|
Posted: Wed Jan 30th, 2013 13:49 |
|
15th Post |
Eric![]() ![]()
![]() |
Gilbert Sandberg wrote:Eric, Not sure what that makes the D7000, if the D600 is wet cardboard? ![]()
____________________ Eric |
||||||||
|
Posted: Fri Feb 1st, 2013 06:32 |
|
16th Post |
Gilbert Sandberg![]()
![]() |
Eric, I cannot remember ever holding a D7000 camera, sorry. Regards, Gilbert
|
||||||||
|
Posted: Fri Feb 1st, 2013 16:24 |
|
17th Post |
richw![]() ![]()
![]() |
It's partly because we have got used to the larger heavier form factor but the D600 is a similar size to the old F2 in the film days (before my photographic time but I held one in a used camera store recently).
|
||||||||
|
Posted: Fri Feb 1st, 2013 18:09 |
|
18th Post |
Eric![]() ![]()
![]() |
richw wrote:It's partly because we have got used to the larger heavier form factor but the D600 is a similar size to the old F2 in the film days (before my photographic time but I held one in a used camera store recently). Good point. I was a Canon shooter pre digital. Before the EOS revolution the bodies were similarly small...unless you added a motor drive .
____________________ Eric |
||||||||
|
This is topic ID = 508 Current time is 11:42 | Page: ![]() ![]() | |
Nikon DSLR Forums > Camera and Lens Forums > Lenses > Nikon 18-35 f3.5-4.5 AFS zoom | Top | |
Users viewing this topic |
Current theme is Modern editor
A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk Thank you. |