| Moderated by: chrisbet, | Page:   1 2 3 4   |
|
|||||||
| Nikkor 105mm f2.8G AFS VR Macro F mount -not DX - Page 3 | |
| Rate Topic |
| Author | Post |
|---|
| Posted: Wed Aug 13th, 2025 11:28 |
|
21st Post |
Eric
|
chrisbet wrote:Lol, Eric - it has been known ... Agreed when you are photographing in the intense light of mainland Europe compared to the high humidity of the British ISLES. Also when photographing light subjects it’s best to drop exp comp into the minus region to guarantee holding onto highlight detail. But as a general rule Nikons don’t need anything more than +/- 0.3 to protect detail. The Fuji gives me a warning not to mess with IT’S choice. 
____________________ Eric |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Wed Aug 13th, 2025 12:02 |
|
22nd Post |
chrisbet
|
Lol - like the Jag that messages me to say "top up the washer fluid!"
____________________ If it is broken it was probably me .... |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Wed Aug 13th, 2025 17:09 |
|
23rd Post |
Graham Whistler
|
Nice sharp lens but not between Macro to mid-range normal photography. We are in Dublin now, came over on ferry this morning. We will be in Ireland till month end will try and post some photos if suitable.
____________________ Graham Whistler |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Wed Aug 13th, 2025 18:40 |
|
24th Post |
Eric
|
Graham Whistler wrote:Nice sharp lens but not between Macro to mid-range normal photography. We are in Dublin now, came over on ferry this morning. We will be in Ireland till month end will try and post some photos if suitable. That was my experience. I said earlier that I felt cheated by Nikon as it was billed as performing just as well beyond macro. It didnt …….unlike my 60mm macro that worked perfectly beyond macro. Enjoy the Emerald Isle.
____________________ Eric |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Wed Aug 13th, 2025 19:11 |
|
25th Post |
Bob
|
chrisbet wrote:I note you took the bird feeder image at f16 and ISO 2000. I took some shots of the dreaded bird feeder with 0EV, f5.6 and f6.3. I have put these on the Splash list to enable you to see the EXIF data. The first one is f6.3 1/100 and the second is f5.6 1/125. They are both ISO 100 Click here to comment on this image. 1 Click here to comment on this image. Click here to comment on this image.  Click here to comment on this image.
|
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Wed Aug 13th, 2025 20:58 |
|
26th Post |
Bob
|
This is the f5.6 1/125 image Click here to comment on this image.
|
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Thu Aug 14th, 2025 10:14 |
|
27th Post |
Eric
|
Exposure looks there or thereabouts on both those, Bob Can I suggest you take a series of increasingly closer shots of the bird feeder. This time try 200iso @ f5.6 ……focus on the feeder and take shots at (say) 1foot, 3foot, 20feet away. It should give you a better assessment of the sharpness of the lens over distance
____________________ Eric |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Thu Aug 14th, 2025 14:21 |
|
28th Post |
Bob
|
Eric wrote:Exposure looks there or thereabouts on both those, Bob Wilco - why didn't I think of that - don't answer that  Meanwhile here's another bee. -albeit with 0.7Ev comp. and not cropped or otherwise molested. Click here to comment on this image.
|
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Thu Aug 14th, 2025 16:53 |
|
29th Post |
Bob
|
First is from 2ft Handheld: Click here to comment on this image. The second is 5ft away:  Click here to comment on this image. Next is 10ft:  Click here to comment on this image. 20ft  Click here to comment on this image. Same distance on monopod VR on  Click here to comment on this image. That's all folks!
|
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Thu Aug 14th, 2025 18:18 |
|
30th Post |
jk
|
Sharp image in the first of the set but the rest look soft. Do you have a brick wall that you can use as a test image against as that will show if the lens has an element that is off as it should be sharp across the whole frame. You need to make sure you are shooting at 90 degrees to the wall!
____________________ Still learning after all these years! https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| This is topic ID = 2029 Current time is 00:12 | Page: 1 2 3 4 | |
| Nikon DSLR Forums > Camera and Lens Forums > Lenses > Nikkor 105mm f2.8G AFS VR Macro F mount -not DX | Top | |
Users viewing this topic |
||
Current theme is Modern editor
| A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk Thank you. |
Hosted by Octarine Services
UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0619 seconds (67% database + 33% PHP). 85 queries executed.
UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0619 seconds (67% database + 33% PHP). 85 queries executed.