Nikon DSLR forum

This site requires new users to accept that a small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk after requesting a new account. Thank you.

Moderated by: chrisbet,

The new Nikkor 300 f4 PF - Page 1

Much lighter and smaller with VR

Rate Topic

Author	Post

Posted: Tue Mar 6th, 2018 14:55

1^st Post

Robert

Joined:	Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location:	South Lakeland, UK
Posts:	4066
Status:	Offline

Worth a serious look.

https://photographylife.com/reviews/nikon-300mm-f4e-pf-ed-vr

____________________
Robert.

Posted: Tue Mar 6th, 2018 21:51

2^nd Post

amazing50

Joined:	Thu Apr 12th, 2012
Location:	Kitchener, Ontario Canada
Posts:	571
Status:	Offline

Don't think I'll be standing in line to get one. Hardly ever used my older 300.

____________________
There is nothing worse than a sharp image of a fuzzy concept ;~) Mike Grace

Posted: Tue Mar 6th, 2018 22:41

3^rd Post

Robert

Joined:	Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location:	South Lakeland, UK
Posts:	4066
Status:	Offline

amazing50 wrote:
Don't think I'll be standing in line to get one. Hardly ever used my older 300.

That might change if you had this one...

____________________
Robert.

Posted: Wed Mar 7th, 2018 03:02

4^th Post

Joined:	Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location:	Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts:	6987
Status:	Offline

With the advent of new modern DSLRs with good high ISO capability I keep looking at my Nikon 300mm f2.8 AFS and think do I need it and its weight as I have the 70-300 AFS VR.
However the results from it are astoundingly sharp just like my 400mm f2.8 AFS. I really dont think VR is worth the extra money on telephoto lenses. If in doubt use a tripod!

____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none

Posted: Wed Mar 7th, 2018 07:51

5^th Post

Robert

Joined:	Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location:	South Lakeland, UK
Posts:	4066
Status:	Offline

jk wrote:
With the advent of new modern DSLRs with good high ISO capability I keep looking at my Nikon 300mm f2.8 AFS and think do I need it and its weight as I have the 70-300 AFS VR.
However the results from it are astoundingly sharp just like my 400mm f2.8 AFS. I really dont think VR is worth the extra money on telephoto lenses. If in doubt use a tripod!

Walking, hiking, trekking with a 2.8 long lens and tripod worthy of the name, is a challenge for most. Even I am beginning to resort to sherpas, that's OK until they rebel, then I end up carrying it all, not fun.

A 300mm f4 VR with a 1.4 TC on a DX body = 450, f4 - 630, f5.6? equivalent fields of view.

Both useful focal lengths and pretty fast even for an older not so high ISO capable body.

With my D3300 a new 300, PF VR would be a breeze, almost pocketable.

____________________
Robert.

Posted: Thu Mar 8th, 2018 03:45

6^th Post

Iain

Joined:	Thu Apr 5th, 2012
Location:	Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Posts:	1487
Status:	Offline

I haven't got one but used a friends and a great little lens that is so light.

1st new

This is topic ID = 1517 Current time is 08:44
Nikon DSLR Forums > Camera and Lens Forums > Lenses > The new Nikkor 300 f4 PF	Top
Users viewing this topic