| Moderated by: chrisbet, | Page:   1 2 3   |
|
|||||||
| Wide or wide enough? - Page 2 | |
| Rate Topic |
| Author | Post |
|---|
| Posted: Tue Oct 10th, 2017 11:38 |
|
11th Post |
highlander
|
16mm (16-35/f4) Attachment: STORM-N-0307.jpg (Downloaded 30 times)
____________________ Blog https://blythestorm.com Website http://www.blythestormphotography.com |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Tue Oct 10th, 2017 11:39 |
|
12th Post |
highlander
|
Both taken straight from camera as raw file and resized to same dimensions to upload
____________________ Blog https://blythestorm.com Website http://www.blythestormphotography.com |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Tue Oct 10th, 2017 12:06 |
|
13th Post |
Eric
|
highlander wrote:14mm (14-24/f2.8) That's a good result for the 14mm....the 16mm shows it's posibly? wide enough.
____________________ Eric |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Tue Oct 10th, 2017 12:10 |
|
14th Post |
jk
|
Is that Ffordes?
____________________ Still learning after all these years! https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Wed Oct 11th, 2017 13:45 |
|
15th Post |
highlander
|
jk wrote:Is that Ffordes? It is indeed
____________________ Blog https://blythestorm.com Website http://www.blythestormphotography.com |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Tue Oct 24th, 2017 11:09 |
|
16th Post |
amazing50
|
jk wrote:I have a Sigma FX 12-24 f4-5.6 that I got from Eric five or six years ago, maybe longer! Tried mine on the D850 and had similar results at 12mm, when peeping at 100%. Some sharpening seems to work well. Won't hesitate to use it with the D850.
____________________ There is nothing worse than a sharp image of a fuzzy concept ;~) Mike Grace |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Tue Oct 24th, 2017 11:10 |
|
17th Post |
highlander
|
I went with the wider option - 14-24/2.8 in the end. I am liking the results. Attachment: STORM-N-0589.jpg (Downloaded 18 times)
____________________ Blog https://blythestorm.com Website http://www.blythestormphotography.com |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Tue Oct 24th, 2017 12:14 |
|
18th Post |
amazing50
|
Looks great
____________________ There is nothing worse than a sharp image of a fuzzy concept ;~) Mike Grace |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Sun Jul 22nd, 2018 15:42 |
|
19th Post |
hj
|
Robert wrote:I took this with it a couple of nights ago, D3, Nikkor 18-35mm f3.5-4.5, 28mm, 5 seconds at f5.6, ISO800 I love that photo. I'll follow your settings and hope to duplicate the technique.
|
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Sun Jul 22nd, 2018 16:03 |
|
20th Post |
Robert
|
hj wrote:I love that photo. Thanks HJ, it was one of those 'happy accidents' which worked out better than expected. The plan was star trails around a lighthouse but there was too much traffic on a nearby road. I can look up the Lr settings and post a screenshot. OK Made the screenshot... Gives you all the major settings plus a little tweak of the curves to fine tune it. Have fun. Attachment: Screen Shot 2018-07-22 at 22.06.10.jpg (Downloaded 8 times)
____________________ Robert. |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| This is topic ID = 1468 Current time is 08:12 | Page: 1 2 3 | |
| Nikon DSLR Forums > Camera and Lens Forums > Lenses > Wide or wide enough? | Top | |
Users viewing this topic |
||
Current theme is Modern editor
| A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk Thank you. |
Hosted by Octarine Services
UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0552 seconds (73% database + 27% PHP). 88 queries executed.
UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0552 seconds (73% database + 27% PHP). 88 queries executed.