This site requires new users to accept that a small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk after requesting a new account. Thank you.

 Moderated by: chrisbet, Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next Page Last Page  
Nikon 200-500mm F5.6   -   Page   5
 Rate Topic 
AuthorPost



Posted: Tue May 10th, 2016 12:21
 
41st Post
Iain



Joined: Thu Apr 5th, 2012
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Posts: 1487
Status: 
Offline
Looks ok Jonathan. It will be interesting to see what it's like on the D500.

 




Posted: Tue May 10th, 2016 12:26
 
42nd Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6987
Status: 
Offline
Some more.

Attachment: D3CS-1-1238.jpg (Downloaded 28 times)



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Tue May 10th, 2016 12:27
 
43rd Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6987
Status: 
Offline
Swallow photobombing!.

Attachment: D3CS-1-1225.jpg (Downloaded 29 times)



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Tue May 10th, 2016 16:02
 
44th Post
Robert



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
I rather like the second one JK, interesting tones and subtle colours.



____________________
Robert.

 




Posted: Wed May 11th, 2016 12:20
 
45th Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4572
Status: 
Offline
Robert wrote:
I rather like the second one JK, interesting tones and subtle colours.

I preferred the third one...thought it was just crate.
:-)



____________________
Eric
 




Posted: Wed May 11th, 2016 12:28
 
46th Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4572
Status: 
Offline
Iain wrote:
Looks ok Jonathan. It will be interesting to see what it's like on the D500.

That's going to be the acid test. I am planning to get one of these lenses and a D500 later this year. Not sure if I will get the lens now and use it on the D750 first.

Without sounding greedy....how does the IQ respond to 1.4x multiplier?

I always felt zoom lens quality suffered with multipliers much more than primes.



____________________
Eric
 




Posted: Wed May 11th, 2016 13:09
 
47th Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6987
Status: 
Offline
I dont have a x1.4 or x1.7 teleconverters, only the x2 and x3 Kenko DG 300 Pro units.
I really only used these TC on the 300mm f2.8 AFS and 400mm f2.8 AFS.
Now I have the 200-500mm f5.6 AFS VR I dont really need them with the zooms where they degrade quality.

I have the following lenses all covering FX sensor - Sigma 12-24mm f4.5-5.6 HSM (AFS), Nikon 24-70mm f2.8 AFS, 70-200 f2.8 AFS VR and 200-500mm AFS VR so I am covered for the 12-500mm range with zooms.
Or I can use AFD primes that step from 14mm f2.8, 20mm f2.8, 50mm f1.4, 105mm f2.8 AFS VR, and 300mm f2.8 AFS or the 400mm f2.8 AFS so I still always end up with a f5.6 lens if I use the x2 TC.
At 600mm and 800mm focal lengths it is difficult to track wildlife if it is fast moving even when tripod mounted with a Wimberley gimbal. Also I tend to prefer to manual focus at these focal lengths.

When you then stick these lenses on an APSC sensored camera there is a further x1.5 apparent focal length increase. So essentially I am covered from 12-1200mm depending on camera body and lens combination.
This covers all my needs!

When you then add in a 21-24MP sensor either FX or DX you should have enough pixels to crop very adequately without appreciable image quality loss.



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Wed May 11th, 2016 14:28
 
48th Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4572
Status: 
Offline
jk wrote:
I dont have a x1.4 or x1.7 teleconverters, only the x2 and x3 Kenko DG 300 Pro units.
I really only used these TC on the 300mm f2.8 AFS and 400mm f2.8 AFS.
Now I have the 200-500mm f5.6 AFS VR I dont really need them with the zooms where they degrade quality.

I have the following lenses all covering FX sensor - Sigma 12-24mm f4.5-5.6 HSM (AFS), Nikon 24-70mm f2.8 AFS, 70-200 f2.8 AFS VR and 200-500mm AFS VR so I am covered for the 12-500mm range with zooms.
Or I can use AFD primes that step from 14mm f2.8, 20mm f2.8, 50mm f1.4, 105mm f2.8 AFS VR, and 300mm f2.8 AFS or the 400mm f2.8 AFS so I still always end up with a f5.6 lens if I use the x2 TC.
At 600mm and 800mm focal lengths it is difficult to track wildlife if it is fast moving even when tripod mounted with a Wimberley gimbal. Also I tend to prefer to manual focus at these focal lengths.

When you then stick these lenses on an APSC sensored camera there is a further x1.5 apparent focal length increase. So essentially I am covered from 12-1200mm depending on camera body and lens combination.
This covers all my needs!

When you then add in a 21-24MP sensor either FX or DX you should have enough pixels to crop very adequately without appreciable image quality loss.


That's true for fast moving subjects ...but 800mm lenses are often used in many wildlife situations.

This was 500mm with kenko 1.4 on D300 ....1050mm.....

Attachment: image.jpeg (Downloaded 23 times)



____________________
Eric
 




Posted: Wed May 11th, 2016 14:35
 
49th Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4572
Status: 
Offline
...whereas on this one I decided to remove the kenko..so 750mm...

Attachment: image.jpeg (Downloaded 23 times)



____________________
Eric
 




Posted: Wed May 11th, 2016 14:40
 
50th Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4572
Status: 
Offline
Sorry correction ..not kenko. It was the sigma 500mm and the Kenko didn't work with Sigma. It was the Sigma 1.5 tele.



____________________
Eric
 

Reply
1st new
This is topic ID = 1287     Current time is 09:25 Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next Page Last Page    
Nikon DSLR Forums > Camera and Lens Forums > Lenses > Nikon 200-500mm F5.6 Top

Users viewing this topic

Post quick reply

Go to top
Go to end
Messages
Home
Recent topics
Unread posts
Last posts
Splash

Current theme is Modern editor



A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk Thank you.


Hosted by Octarine Services

UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0689 seconds (69% database + 31% PHP). 84 queries executed.