This site requires new users to accept that a small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk after requesting a new account. Thank you. |
Moderated by: chrisbet, | Page: 1 2 3 ![]() ![]() |
|
Nikon introduces 24-70mm F2.8 VR, 24mm F1.8 and 200-500 F5.6 FX lenses   -   Page   1 | |
Rating: ![]() |
Author | Post |
---|
Posted: Tue Aug 4th, 2015 15:14 |
|
1st Post |
jk![]() ![]()
![]() |
Nikon introduces 24-70mm F2.8 VR, 24mm F1.8 and 200-500 F5.6 FX lenses. http://www.dpreview.com/articles/6268500488/nikon-introduces-24-70mm-f2-8-vr-24mm-f1-8-and-200-500-f5-6-fx-lenses Pricing and availability for the three lenses is as follows: AF-S Nikkor 24-70mm F2.8E ED VR - $2399 in late August AF-S Nikkor 24mm F1.8G ED - $749.95 in mid-September AF-S Nikkor 200-500mm F5.6E ED VR - $1399.95 in mid-September The new 200-500 f5.6 looks nice but then again so is the price, I think I might be tempted to trade my 400mm f2.8 AFS for one of them and an XT1 body.
____________________ Still learning after all these years! https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none |
||||||||
|
Posted: Wed Aug 5th, 2015 03:55 |
|
2nd Post |
Graham Whistler![]() ![]()
![]() |
Interesting 200-500 wonder how it compares with my 80-400mm? Let me know if you are parting with your 400mm I could be interested if price is good!
____________________ Graham Whistler |
||||||||
|
Posted: Wed Aug 5th, 2015 06:06 |
|
3rd Post |
jk![]() ![]()
![]() |
I will probably release the 400mm in October when I come across to UK. It is 400mm f2.8 ED AFS but no VR. I am unconvinced that VR is useful on long telephotos as I will frequently use it on a tripod so the VR must be switched off for tripod use. Also then Fuji come out with their 100-400mm I will possibly get that for my XT1.
____________________ Still learning after all these years! https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none |
||||||||
|
Posted: Thu Aug 6th, 2015 13:19 |
|
4th Post |
Iain![]() ![]()
![]() |
The 200-500 looks very interesting, it may be the one thing that might bring me back to Nikon.
|
||||||||
|
Posted: Thu Aug 27th, 2015 11:26 |
|
5th Post |
jk![]() ![]()
![]() |
Iain wrote:The 200-500 looks very interesting, it may be the one thing that might bring me back to Nikon. Well with the D7200 and the 200-500mm you effectively get a 300-750mm equivalent on a FX camera.
____________________ Still learning after all these years! https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none |
||||||||
|
Posted: Sat Aug 29th, 2015 12:17 |
|
6th Post |
Iain![]() ![]()
![]() |
That was in the back of my mind when I bought the D7200 Jonathan.
|
||||||||
|
Posted: Sat Aug 29th, 2015 14:28 |
|
7th Post |
jk![]() ![]()
![]() |
I want the first one in UK! I want to get one of these if I dont dump my Nikon gear before it arrives!
____________________ Still learning after all these years! https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none |
||||||||
|
Posted: Sat Aug 29th, 2015 15:58 |
|
8th Post |
Eric![]() ![]()
![]() |
Graham Whistler wrote:Interesting 200-500 wonder how it compares with my 80-400mm? Let me know if you are parting with your 400mm I could be interested if price is good! It's hard not to assume that it will suffer the same shortcomings when compared to a prime.
____________________ Eric |
||||||||
|
Posted: Sun Aug 30th, 2015 08:04 |
|
9th Post |
amazing50![]()
![]() |
Primes also have shortcomings, even though they are sharper etc. Zooms fill the frame more often and avoid losses from cropping. Just try a moon shot with an 85mm Zeiss and crop the moon to 200mm immage.
____________________ There is nothing worse than a sharp image of a fuzzy concept ;~) Mike Grace |
||||||||
|
Posted: Sun Aug 30th, 2015 10:52 |
|
10th Post |
Eric![]() ![]()
![]() |
amazing50 wrote:Primes also have shortcomings, even though they are sharper etc. I was thinking more of the maximum aperture and speed of use, rather than the reach. I got the impression that Graham's 80-400 was 'falling short' due to max aperture limitations and speed of focus as well as reach....hence buying the 500mm prime.
____________________ Eric |
||||||||
|
This is topic ID = 1218 Current time is 09:32 | Page: 1 2 3 ![]() ![]() | |
Nikon DSLR Forums > Camera and Lens Forums > Lenses > Nikon introduces 24-70mm F2.8 VR, 24mm F1.8 and 200-500 F5.6 FX lenses | Top | |
Users viewing this topic |
Current theme is Modern editor
A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk Thank you. |