| Moderated by: chrisbet, | Page:   1 2 |
|
|||||||
| Nikon 300 f4 vr - Page 2 | |
Rating: 
|
| Author | Post |
|---|
| Posted: Fri Feb 20th, 2015 07:01 |
|
11th Post |
jk
|
 Whooops I have just killed the need for VR - almost!! 
____________________ Still learning after all these years! https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Fri Feb 20th, 2015 16:14 |
|
12th Post |
Eric
|
Unless you intend to have blurred movement, shooting moving subjects at slow shutter speeds is pointless with or without VR. The subject dictates the shutter speed. That said, its a question of what options you have to 'freeze the action'...and where any compromise can be made. For many mobile wildlife subjects, shutterspeeds of 1/500 are often order of the day. If the right exposure and composition cannot be obtained using fstop and ISO, then a tripod or VR won't help. When lighting is outside the reach of fstop and ISO .....go back to the car...and drive to the pub. VR is more about wobbly photographers, who don't have a tripod and who aren't able or prepared to stretch the fstop/ISO envelope. But having said that, using high ISO under incandescent lighting is far worse than daylight. So when it comes to interior low light shots, I would lean towards VR over high ISO.
____________________ Eric |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Fri Feb 20th, 2015 16:21 |
|
13th Post |
jk
|
Yes I agree Eric.  Nikon is not liking this! 
____________________ Still learning after all these years! https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Mon Feb 23rd, 2015 09:24 |
|
14th Post |
amazing50
|
Some of the latest DSLR bodies have VR built in.
____________________ There is nothing worse than a sharp image of a fuzzy concept ;~) Mike Grace |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Mon Feb 23rd, 2015 13:35 |
|
15th Post |
jk
|
amazing50 wrote: Some of the latest DSLR bodies have VR built in. Not Nikon yet. I think that would kill their VR lens offerings but be very popular with users. I think there are design considerations that make it good to have in lens versus in body. I cant remember what it is but I remember reading about it and thinking ' fair enough! '. 
____________________ Still learning after all these years! https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Tue Feb 24th, 2015 08:56 |
|
16th Post |
amazing50
|
Some of the in camera VR systems move the sensor to sync with the vibration. Allows those super zoom fixed lens cameras to get sharp pix at 1200mm eq or more.
____________________ There is nothing worse than a sharp image of a fuzzy concept ;~) Mike Grace |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| This is topic ID = 1154 Current time is 09:21 | Page: 1 2 | |
| Nikon DSLR Forums > Camera and Lens Forums > Lenses > Nikon 300 f4 vr | Top | |
Users viewing this topic |
||
Current theme is Modern editor
| A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk Thank you. |
Hosted by Octarine Services
UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0540 seconds (66% database + 34% PHP). 62 queries executed.
UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0540 seconds (66% database + 34% PHP). 62 queries executed.