| Moderated by: chrisbet, | Page: 1 2   |
|
|||||||
| The New Nikon: AF-S Nikkor 20mm f1.8G ED - Page 1 | |
| Any members have user info? | Rate Topic |
| Author | Post |
|---|
| Posted: Mon Dec 15th, 2014 13:29 |
|
1st Post |
Graham Whistler
|
Have any of you used it or seen any reviews? I am quite interested in this for my D810. At present my wide angle is the 14-24 works well but is large and heavy when travelling and with FX camera I rarely need more than 20mm. The new lens would take up much less room and at only 355g is light. What are the results like? Or should I hold onto my old friend?
____________________ Graham Whistler |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Mon Dec 15th, 2014 14:53 |
|
2nd Post |
Gilbert Sandberg
|
Graham, I do not own either, but I have handled/used both on occasions. On the recent 20mm 1.8. I cannot see the use of a f 1.8 aperture, 2.8 would be enough for many people. On the other hand, compared to the (famous) 14-24 the 20 1.8 is compact, light and more affordable. Compared to most zoom lenses, distortion should be a lot less. Regards, Gilbert
|
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Mon Dec 15th, 2014 17:24 |
|
3rd Post |
jk
|
I have a 20mm f2.8 AFD and it is a superb lens for both visible and IR shooting, I also have the 17-35 f2.8 AFS so I think I am well covered. I am sure the new lens has better handling of flare due to the newer coatings but I am very happy with my current lenses.
____________________ Still learning after all these years! https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Tue Dec 16th, 2014 10:27 |
|
4th Post |
Graham Whistler
|
The f1.8 is not an issue for me as most of time when using this sort of lens I will be well stopped down. I need to know how good the lens in in terms of sharpness and distortion.
____________________ Graham Whistler |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Tue Dec 16th, 2014 12:59 |
|
5th Post |
Gilbert Sandberg
|
Graham, re: sharpness and distortion. I ahve not seen or done any tests. Onthe basis that this is a new design, with the latest coatings, and not being a budget zoom-lens, it should satisfy the criteria you mention. E.g. remember the distortion reported in the 16-35 f 4 lens of recent years. Regards, Gilbert
|
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Tue Dec 16th, 2014 15:01 |
|
6th Post |
Robert
|
If in doubt, hire one for a day or so on the understanding if you buy they refund some or all the hire charges. I think Calumet do that, I know Fishwicks of Haydock used to, but sadly they are long gone. I would have though that stopped down the lens should be excellent. I would be amazed if it wasn't. It isn't exactly a difficult focal length to get right, especially for a non zoom.
____________________ Robert. |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Tue Dec 16th, 2014 17:47 |
|
7th Post |
Graham Whistler
|
I have found several reviews now on the internet and reports look good for the new lens. I was impressed with how good one review said the flare from strong side or back light is greatly reduced. The 14-24 is very prone to this type of flare and I think the greatly domed front of lens does not help. See attach pix taken a few weeks ago with D810 in strong side light that just caught the side of the lens at 14mm. I was able to spot the flare and retake the shot with my hand keeping sun off the lens. I will try to have a test go with the new lens as the reduced size tempts me a lot! Attachment: Garden0080.jpg (Downloaded 60 times)
____________________ Graham Whistler |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Tue Dec 16th, 2014 19:02 |
|
8th Post |
Eric
|
Graham Whistler wrote:I have found several reviews now on the internet and reports look good for the new lens. I was impressed with how good one review said the flare from strong side or back light is greatly reduced. I have had many such situations with the14-24...indoors with room setting lights as well as sunlight through windows or outdoors. This flare problem, its weight and the front glass vulnerability (I've scratched mine!) frequently cause me to dispense with it.
____________________ Eric |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Thu Dec 18th, 2014 04:38 |
|
9th Post |
Graham Whistler
|
Now with full frame cameras for me 20mm is all I need. I hardly get to use use the 14-24 as it makes my camera bag too heavy. The new 20mm lens fits the bill for me.
____________________ Graham Whistler |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Thu Dec 18th, 2014 06:12 |
|
10th Post |
Robert
|
Graham, had you seriously considered the Nikkor 2.8 20mm, it's an outstanding lens with minimal distortion.
____________________ Robert. |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| This is topic ID = 1141 Current time is 11:36 | Page: 1 2 | |
| Nikon DSLR Forums > Camera and Lens Forums > Lenses > The New Nikon: AF-S Nikkor 20mm f1.8G ED | Top | |
Users viewing this topic |
||
Current theme is Modern editor
| A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk Thank you. |
Hosted by Octarine Services
UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0450 seconds (69% database + 31% PHP). 82 queries executed.
UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0450 seconds (69% database + 31% PHP). 82 queries executed.