This site requires new users to accept that a small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk after requesting a new account. Thank you. |
Moderated by: chrisbet, | Page: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Next Weekend!   -   Page   2 | |
Rate Topic |
Author | Post |
---|
Posted: Tue Jan 22nd, 2013 14:32 |
|
11th Post |
richw![]() ![]()
![]() |
I think my favourite shot was the night before as all in camera with flash and sunset. The D3s does an amazing job with this.![]()
|
||||||||
|
Posted: Tue Jan 22nd, 2013 14:53 |
|
12th Post |
Eric![]() ![]()
![]() |
richw wrote:Thanks Eric, I might give that a go. I have a sequence of shots that show Jac (my wife) missing her jump and catch on 'Everest' which is a large half pipe they have to sprint up leap and catch the ledge or the hand of someone strong enough to pull them up. Are the last 3 crops of the same framing as the first 3? One option would be to overlay them (layers) keep the top and bottom full opacity but drop the opacity of the intermediate ones to give a ghost trail down the slope. Of course you need to erase any interference lines and details where the layer register isn't identical. Something like this.... https://www.dropbox.com/s/13wzhpowofvdg1v/_DSC3645.jpg Alternatively, from a display perspective, you could just print 3 letterbox pictures (losing grip, sliding, end) and hang them as a landscape vertical triptych. A landscape version similar to this painting... https://www.dropbox.com/s/fdllfixubh4wsfl/_DSC0535.jpg Will have another think...maybe someone else has a idea?
____________________ Eric |
||||||||
|
Posted: Wed Jan 23rd, 2013 04:39 |
|
13th Post |
Eric![]() ![]()
![]() |
On the main picture of your wife losing her grip, there is a sign advertising HOLDEN. My humorous thinking would be inclined to edit it. With a big X across the E and an O over the top!![]()
____________________ Eric |
||||||||
|
Posted: Wed Jan 23rd, 2013 07:47 |
|
14th Post |
richw![]() ![]()
![]() |
Unfortunately I was moving around and zooming in and out so I don't have a shot of the whole view the close ups were zoomed in optically rather than cropped, however I have made rough attempt to build a composite (very rough) to use the effect Eric suggested. Might have another go tomorrow and put the last image (her at the bottom) on top of the one above it. I added a bit of motion blur but wish I hadn't now as it makes the interim image look cut out and pasted in which they weren't, they were just blended around with a mask. P.S. There is a lot of content aware fill going on in this image! Attachment: untitled-6589-Edit-3-Edit.jpg (Downloaded 31 times)
|
||||||||
|
Posted: Wed Jan 23rd, 2013 08:33 |
|
15th Post |
jk![]() ![]()
![]() |
Nice one Rich. I bet Jackie just loves it! ![]() You need one of the next run up where she was hopefully successful as well. ![]()
____________________ Still learning after all these years! https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none |
||||||||
|
Posted: Wed Jan 23rd, 2013 10:11 |
|
16th Post |
Eric![]() ![]()
![]() |
richw wrote:Unfortunately I was moving around and zooming in and out so I don't have a shot of the whole view the close ups were zoomed in optically rather than cropped, however I have made rough attempt to build a composite (very rough) to use the effect Eric suggested. Might have another go tomorrow and put the last image (her at the bottom) on top of the one above it. I added a bit of motion blur but wish I hadn't now as it makes the interim image look cut out and pasted in which they weren't, they were just blended around with a mask. I would use good,old fashioned erasing around each of the transparent body layers. Just leave the first layer as the background. Not sure you need the two images at the start they're very close to one another. You will be surprised how much you can back off the opacity and still get the effect. You could put some motion blur on the transparent layers as they are going to be blurry anyway. Also can you rotate the image anticlockwise a tad to exaggerate the slope? Don't know how it would look. But it's stating to be a fun image. Well done. Ps can you graft her legs from the penultimate image on to the last image...but get them poking out of the frame? OK off for my meds now. ![]()
____________________ Eric |
||||||||
|
Posted: Wed Jan 23rd, 2013 18:03 |
|
17th Post |
richw![]() ![]()
![]() |
Eric wrote:richw wrote: Unfortunately there is not enough of a background overlap to erase and turn the opacity down otherwise there start to be patches of the half pipe that start to become see through. Maybe I should try to build the half pipe without Jac on it first and then add her to that image. If only I had shot the damn thing as a whole whilst no one was running up - it would be much easier but I didn't have this image in my head then! I agree the second image is very close, I was trying to show the "Missed catch" but I think you are right it detracts from the overall image. The idea on the legs is brilliant, will definitely give that a go on attempt two!
|
||||||||
|
Posted: Wed Jan 23rd, 2013 18:08 |
|
18th Post |
richw![]() ![]()
![]() |
jk wrote:Nice one Rich. "Loves" probably would be the wrong word but she is very tolerant of me! She made the second go no problem!
|
||||||||
|
Posted: Thu Jan 24th, 2013 03:26 |
|
19th Post |
jk![]() ![]()
![]() |
richw wrote:jk wrote: I think you need the compare/contrast -if at first you dont suceede then try again! ![]()
____________________ Still learning after all these years! https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none |
||||||||
|
Posted: Thu Jan 24th, 2013 14:20 |
|
20th Post |
Eric![]() ![]()
![]() |
richw wrote:Eric wrote: I know what you mean about "I wish I had shot some empty shots" I have just been asked by a garden furniture company to superimpose sets taken in the studio, into garden settings. I had done loads of shots in garden settings last year but never thought to take some 'blanks' for later use. Now struggling to get background images that the customer likes ...that also fit the shooting angle and lighting of the studio shots. GRRR! Just another thought on the " legs out of the frame " idea. You could have a wooden frame round the image which is broken where the legs come out. ![]()
____________________ Eric |
||||||||
|
This is topic ID = 475 Current time is 10:33 | Page: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Nikon DSLR Forums > Photography > Photography Projects > Next Weekend! | Top | |
Users viewing this topic |
Current theme is Modern editor
A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk Thank you. |