This site requires new users to accept that a small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk after requesting a new account. Thank you.

 Moderated by: chrisbet, Page:    1  2  Next Page Last Page  
Air show   -   Page   1
 Rate Topic 
AuthorPost



Posted: Sat Aug 20th, 2022 16:58
 
1st Post
chrisbet



Joined: Thu Feb 7th, 2019
Location: Leigh On Sea, Essex , United Kingdom
Posts: 1518
Status: 
Online
Southend no longer hosts an airshow - it was the biggest in Europe . However we still act as a base for the airplanes flying at Eastbourne this weekend and if it weren't for the trees I would be able to see down to the airport. So I thought I would make use of the scaffolding tower to get a better view of the planes going in and out. Lol - they are very fast going over my house but I caught a few reasonable shots of one of the nine planes!



Click here to comment on this image.



Click here to comment on this image.



Click here to comment on this image.



Click here to comment on this image.



____________________
If it is broken it was probably me ....
 




Posted: Sat Aug 20th, 2022 22:57
 
2nd Post
Graham Whistler



Joined: Fri Apr 13th, 2012
Location: Fareham, United Kingdom
Posts: 1937
Status: 
Offline
Well done you got some good captures Chris.



____________________
Graham Whistler
 




Posted: Sun Aug 21st, 2022 10:06
 
3rd Post
chrisbet



Joined: Thu Feb 7th, 2019
Location: Leigh On Sea, Essex , United Kingdom
Posts: 1518
Status: 
Online
Thanks - unfortunately they were flying in a group straight at me and then turning over me so it was a bit frantic trying to focus in on one! On the way out earlier they were flying slower and were further away, but then my 70-200 didn't have the reach to pull them in ....



Click here to comment on this image.

Which, with a heavy crop looks like -



Click here to comment on this image.



____________________
If it is broken it was probably me ....
 




Posted: Sun Aug 21st, 2022 13:59
 
4th Post
chrisbet



Joined: Thu Feb 7th, 2019
Location: Leigh On Sea, Essex , United Kingdom
Posts: 1518
Status: 
Online
Tried with the 500mm f8 reflex today but the light not as good o.O but quite sharp, you can clearly see the pitot tube on the side of the nose and the three smoke injector nozzles on the tail.




Click here to comment on this image.



____________________
If it is broken it was probably me ....
 




Posted: Tue Aug 23rd, 2022 10:00
 
5th Post
chrisbet



Joined: Thu Feb 7th, 2019
Location: Leigh On Sea, Essex , United Kingdom
Posts: 1518
Status: 
Online
and a spit -



Click here to comment on this image.



____________________
If it is broken it was probably me ....
 




Posted: Tue Aug 23rd, 2022 21:39
 
6th Post
novicius



Joined: Sun Aug 12th, 2012
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 445
Status: 
Offline
Great Captures :applause:



____________________
Back in Danmark

I do not use my equipment to make photo`s .. I take photo`s to use my equipment

The better I become at photography,the better my camera gets.
 




Posted: Wed Aug 24th, 2022 23:12
 
7th Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4571
Status: 
Offline
We had a couple of Chinooks flying back and forth over the garden today. 
Wasn’t ready for them, so grab shots at too fast a shutter speed setting to get rotor blur.:whip:




And not ideal angle….directly overhead :banghead:





Click here to comment on this image.



____________________
Eric
 




Posted: Thu Aug 25th, 2022 07:46
 
8th Post
chrisbet



Joined: Thu Feb 7th, 2019
Location: Leigh On Sea, Essex , United Kingdom
Posts: 1518
Status: 
Online
It does look a bit odd with stationary blades! - to get a full disc would need an exposure of 0.267 sec as Chinook's rotors spin at 225 rpm - at 1/60 you would only get 22 degrees of blur but I guess that would look better.

Can you add some blur in post?



____________________
If it is broken it was probably me ....
 




Posted: Thu Aug 25th, 2022 14:45
 
9th Post
Iain



Joined: Thu Apr 5th, 2012
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Posts: 1487
Status: 
Offline
The first one has some trails off the rotors.

 




Posted: Thu Aug 25th, 2022 18:51
 
10th Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4571
Status: 
Offline
chrisbet wrote:
It does look a bit odd with stationary blades! - to get a full disc would need an exposure of 0.267 sec as Chinook's rotors spin at 225 rpm - at 1/60 you would only get 22 degrees of blur but I guess that would look better.

Can you add some blur in post?

Yes…but that’s cheating.:lol:


The photo isn’t good enough to warrant any work on it. It’s a reminder that knowing what settings are required is of no consequence when you have no time to react. We had the Red Arrows fly directly over our garden a month back at ‘zero height’ while I was up a tree pruning!
They were en route to RAF Marham (10miles south) for a family day flypast. They have been doing it for several years and I STILL forget to check the date each year. Maybe in 2023:thumbs:



____________________
Eric
 

Reply
1st new
This is topic ID = 1954     Current time is 22:20 Page:    1  2  Next Page Last Page    
Nikon DSLR Forums > Photography > Photography Projects > Air show Top

Users viewing this topic

Post quick reply

Go to top
Go to end
Messages
Home
Recent topics
Unread posts
Last posts
Splash

Current theme is Modern editor



A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk Thank you.


Hosted by Octarine Services

UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0585 seconds (64% database + 36% PHP). 82 queries executed.