This site requires new users to accept that a small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk after requesting a new account. Thank you.

 Moderated by: chrisbet, Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2   
HDR photography   -   Page   2
 Rate Topic 
AuthorPost



Posted: Fri Mar 8th, 2019 12:05
 
11th Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6987
Status: 
Offline
Some more.





____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Fri Mar 8th, 2019 12:06
 
12th Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6987
Status: 
Offline





____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Fri Mar 8th, 2019 12:08
 
13th Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6987
Status: 
Offline





____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Fri Mar 8th, 2019 12:08
 
14th Post
Robert



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
Your first image was slow to load at this end JK.

Those rock formations are quite spectacular, are the rocks stacked naturally or did man have a hand?



____________________
Robert.

 




Posted: Fri Mar 8th, 2019 14:14
 
15th Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6987
Status: 
Offline
First image might be a bit large.
I was going to ask Chris if we could have resize on upload.  We could resize automatically to 1200 longest side, max size 2MB.

The rocks are all natural.  Very spectacular.



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Fri Mar 8th, 2019 14:54
 
16th Post
Robert



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
1200 is too small and in any case uploaded sizes should be in multiples or fractions of 1024 pixels to avoid pixel jostling.

I was limiting myself to 1024 for the last two or three years but most people have broadband nowadays.

I have raised my Flicker upload size to 2048 on the long side, I feel that's big enough to reveal detail and small enough  to manage.



____________________
Robert.

 




Posted: Fri Mar 8th, 2019 14:58
 
17th Post
Iain



Joined: Thu Apr 5th, 2012
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Posts: 1487
Status: 
Offline
While I'm not a fan of it I think it has its uses as long as it's not over done.

 




Posted: Fri Mar 8th, 2019 19:37
 
18th Post
chrisbet



Joined: Thu Feb 7th, 2019
Location: Leigh On Sea, Essex , United Kingdom
Posts: 1518
Status: 
Offline
I find myself agreeing with Robert again!

Occasional slow upload / download is likely due to server load or delays en route - reducing image size by resizing will only reintroduce the loss of quality you were originally seeking to remedy.

I initially found the hdr images slow to download and they are 1200 wide - since then the just snap onto my screen.



____________________
If it is broken it was probably me ....
 




Posted: Sat Mar 9th, 2019 02:50
 
19th Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6987
Status: 
Offline
Maybe we need to have the image size and max. pixel length adjustable by the Admin in a control panel.  
I am more concerned about if it is possible technically at this point rather than the detail of the final upload.  As long as these are known and we document how to change them then adjustments can always be made.

I think that we are now in a place where the camera definition is way beyond the average person's screen or printer resolution 72dpi so what we see on screen is limited.  
I dont want to return to the previous situation where to me posting an image was a disappointment rather than a sharing of pleasure in the image.



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Sat Mar 9th, 2019 03:25
 
20th Post
chrisbet



Joined: Thu Feb 7th, 2019
Location: Leigh On Sea, Essex , United Kingdom
Posts: 1518
Status: 
Offline
Technically it is possible to set dimensions and filesize limitations and make them settable within the admin panel. It is also possible to turn on or off the resizing entirely.

Whenever resizing is employed, the process is to break the image into data, draw a blank "frame" of the required size and then repopulate the frame with the image data - in the process the image loses data in the same way that it does in camera when saving jpeg files. Halve the image size and you lose 75% of the definition.



____________________
If it is broken it was probably me ....
 

Reply
1st new
This is topic ID = 1679     Current time is 02:34 Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2     
Nikon DSLR Forums > Photography > Photography Projects > HDR photography Top

Users viewing this topic

Post quick reply

Go to top
Go to end
Messages
Home
Recent topics
Unread posts
Last posts
Splash

Current theme is Modern editor



A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk Thank you.


Hosted by Octarine Services

UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0589 seconds (65% database + 35% PHP). 80 queries executed.