This site requires new users to accept that a small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk after requesting a new account. Thank you.

 Moderated by: chrisbet, Page:  First Page Previous Page  ...  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  ...  Next Page Last Page  
Bird Photography   -   Page   42
Nikon DSLRs and Lenses for bird photography  Rate Topic 
AuthorPost



Posted: Tue Dec 11th, 2018 17:45
 
411th Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4575
Status: 
Offline
I was struggling with lighting in a woodland on Monday. This shot was the least noisy at iso 2500.

Attachment: 685775BC-18BA-45A5-B0FE-628963E6B274.jpeg (Downloaded 8 times)



____________________
Eric
 




Posted: Tue Dec 11th, 2018 17:50
 
412th Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4575
Status: 
Offline
And at 11000iso....well even the long tailed tit is bemused at the gritty surroundings.

Attachment: 4B1581C7-62AB-425D-BFEB-2029FBA08585.jpeg (Downloaded 8 times)



____________________
Eric
 




Posted: Tue Dec 11th, 2018 17:57
 
413th Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4575
Status: 
Offline
I have made no attempt to sharpen or denoise these files...they are just cropped ( heavily for long tailed tit) to better show the background noise and enable posting.

I would be interested to know what ISO's other people are routinely needing to capture woodland birds?



____________________
Eric
 




Posted: Tue Dec 11th, 2018 18:06
 
414th Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4575
Status: 
Offline
Here's another just under 3000iso

Attachment: 01C29241-EACD-4949-818B-C1D2EEB3244C.jpeg (Downloaded 8 times)



____________________
Eric
 




Posted: Tue Dec 11th, 2018 18:11
 
415th Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4575
Status: 
Offline
It is less obvious when the subject is bigger in the frame and the background more forgiving. This was at 7500iso

Oops...this was a full frame image and too big to post. So I sampled it down and I think the jpegging has softened some of the noise.

Maybe that's the answer? :lol::lol:

Attachment: E1DB87F2-A5F6-4903-815A-46A4688FDBA6.jpeg (Downloaded 8 times)



____________________
Eric
 




Posted: Wed Dec 12th, 2018 04:57
 
416th Post
Graham Whistler



Joined: Fri Apr 13th, 2012
Location: Fareham, United Kingdom
Posts: 1937
Status: 
Offline
The naughty wizard waved a wand over your pix Eric! Even these super ISO settings need a bit of after post work to improve but I find the D500 beyond ISO2500 quickly gets beyond help.
What a lot of photographers forget if you under expose in the first place noise builds up very quickly in post production and even Photoshop CC is not able to correct it.

Attachment: Eric.jpg (Downloaded 6 times)



____________________
Graham Whistler
 




Posted: Wed Dec 12th, 2018 06:37
 
417th Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6987
Status: 
Offline
Graham, it might be useful if you could detail the steps you took to improve the image.
XMP file would be useful.



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Wed Dec 12th, 2018 07:44
 
418th Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4575
Status: 
Offline
Now you see I don't want to HAVE TO remove artefacts after the event. Frankly all de-noising software does is make the photo softer. Without masking, that includes the subject!

I still want to get it right in the camera. I know I know that's old school!

I don't want to HAVE TO crop.....so I need to get closer or buy expensive long lenses.

I don't want to HAVE TO de-noise....I want a noise free camera up to 5000iso. If the lighting needs higher iso....I can either accept I will get noisey images or go to the pub.

I don't want to HAVE TO mask my subjects to protect them from the excesses of de-noising filters.

Take a look at Jeffs Slavonic grebe shot.
Being frank, if that level of noise free, sharp quality can be obtained on a 4/3 camera why can't Nikon do better on cameras costing 3,4,5x the price of the Panasonic?



____________________
Eric
 




Posted: Wed Dec 12th, 2018 07:52
 
419th Post
Graham Whistler



Joined: Fri Apr 13th, 2012
Location: Fareham, United Kingdom
Posts: 1937
Status: 
Offline
JK I will do my best but it is a bit complex:
It is best done on the RAW file but you can also process Tiffs or JPG but works much better on RAW load image in normal way into Photoshop CC:
1: Filter: Camera Raw Filter selct 3 option of x2 triangles
2: Image size to 200% so you can see noise.
3: Lumiinace slider to 40% watching noise go
Luminance detail up to 80% Sharpening up to 60 Sharpening plus Luminance should = 100 as rough guide.
4: fit image to fit to view.
5: Hold down ALT Key screen goes white keep holding ALT and slide Masking up to 70% you will now just see highlight detail only.
Open image and finish any normal processing you would do like levels etc. (This pix has been processed this way too)
It is much better to do this live on computer as I do for a workshop.

Attachment: Wagtail2446.jpg (Downloaded 5 times)



____________________
Graham Whistler
 




Posted: Wed Dec 12th, 2018 08:02
 
420th Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4575
Status: 
Offline
Graham Whistler wrote:

What a lot of photographers forget if you under expose in the first place noise builds up very quickly in post production and even Photoshop CC is not able to correct it.


That can indeed be true, but in this image (accidentally set ex comp to +0.3) the noise is clearly an inherent problem

Attachment: 9B97FC98-9939-424C-BB3E-B0BD8BC853F3.jpeg (Downloaded 5 times)



____________________
Eric
 

Reply
1st new
This is topic ID = 1530     Current time is 04:38 Page:  First Page Previous Page  ...  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  ...  Next Page Last Page    
Nikon DSLR Forums > Photography > Photography Projects > Bird Photography Top

Users viewing this topic

Post quick reply

Go to top
Go to end
Messages
Home
Recent topics
Unread posts
Last posts
Splash

Current theme is Modern editor



A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk Thank you.


Hosted by Octarine Services

UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.1582 seconds (83% database + 17% PHP). 82 queries executed.