This site requires new users to accept that a small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk after requesting a new account. Thank you.

 Moderated by: chrisbet, Page:  First Page Previous Page  ...  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next Page Last Page  
Aurora Photography   -   Page   9
North West England, at the limits?  Rate Topic 
AuthorPost



Posted: Thu Jan 21st, 2016 03:44
 
81st Post
Robert



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
Very good Mike, all about being in the right place at the right time.

I had an adventurous time last evening...

I have decided that star trails are boring. Yet, they hold a fascination. So I have decided to experiment with a combination of interesting subjects and incorporate star trail backgrounds. I haven't run the startrail software yet (StarStaX) but this is a taster, which will have startrails added later when I have finished the PP.

I hadn't realised but I caught the aurora without realising it was there. When I moved to my second location I got a text alert of high solar energy but I wasn't going back!

Nikon D300s, Nikkor 18-105 VR, @ 18mm, 30 Sec @ f4.5, ISO1600. A couple of stops over exposed, pulled some back in PP.


Coniston Water with the Old Man of Coniston in the background.

My second location was Lowick Church, again still a bit over exposed @ f5.6, you can just see the effects of the aurora behind the church.

Nikon D300s, Nikkor 18-105 VR, @ 18mm, 30 Sec @ f5.6, ISO1600.


Lowick Church at 7:15pm 20 Jan 2016



____________________
Robert.

 




Posted: Thu Jan 21st, 2016 05:23
 
82nd Post
Judith



Joined: Fri Apr 13th, 2012
Location: Scotland, United Kingdom
Posts: 325
Status: 
Offline
Oh, like the snowy hills! No snow at all where I am. It doesn't really lie on the coast.

 




Posted: Thu Jan 21st, 2016 08:44
 
83rd Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6987
Status: 
Offline
Judith,
Aurora over distillery works fine for me. :-)
Plenty of distilleries in your area!



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Thu Jan 21st, 2016 12:07
 
84th Post
amazing50

 

Joined: Thu Apr 12th, 2012
Location: Kitchener, Ontario Canada
Posts: 571
Status: 
Offline
With only about 5 hours of daylight at this time of year they have plenty of time and mainly clear skies to get these shots.
Another one by Jake Paleczny, Wood Bison under the Aurora Borealis at the Yukon Wildlife Preserve.

Attachment: Wood Bison under the Aurora Borealis at the Yukon Wildlife Preserve.jpg (Downloaded 44 times)



____________________
There is nothing worse than a sharp image of a fuzzy concept ;~) Mike Grace
 




Posted: Thu Jan 21st, 2016 12:27
 
85th Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6987
Status: 
Offline
Robert did you intentionally over-expose the top image?
It was probably the extra exposure that allowed you to capture the aurora.



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Thu Jan 21st, 2016 15:03
 
86th Post
Robert



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
jk wrote:
Robert did you intentionally over-expose the top image?
It was probably the extra exposure that allowed you to capture the aurora.


Not really JK, it was pretty well dark when I took that but the effect of the 85% moon, reflections and the fact I was trying to bring the pier into prominence, having taken a few trial exposure was what I plumped for. Once chosen I had to stick with it. I was literally groping in the dark, at each venue I reduced the exposure. The great benefit of using NEF's is it gives me much more latitude while still retaining decent quality.

The first exposure I made of the church it looked like bright sunlight! I'm not used to having usable ISO1600 at my fingertips!

The image quality of the church isn't the best but I am quite relaxed about that, it helps to show it wasn't taken in daylight and gives it a rugged appearance, to me it adds character. The stars are sharp enough, If I really wanted I could reduce the number of church images stacked by masking the church from the sky, I am sure its due to very slight movement of the tripod or the camera during the 30 minutes I made the exposures for.

Whoops! I hadn't added the star track image of the church! I need a responsible adult to keep an eye on me...

Point of interest, you can see time on the sundial, in this case, moondial, it's about right.

This image is layered with 48 images taken at 34 second intervals using the D300s and Nikkor 18-105 VR.



____________________
Robert.

 




Posted: Thu Jan 21st, 2016 17:54
 
87th Post
Robert



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
OK I have done the second one, the Parkamoor Coniston Pier with the Old Man of Coniston in the background.

The aurora is better than I thought, I wish I had known it was displaying, I would have stayed longer I only have about 70 frames which isn't really long enough for time-lapse with a frame rate of 24fps.



____________________
Robert.

 




Posted: Thu Jan 21st, 2016 18:15
 
88th Post
Judith



Joined: Fri Apr 13th, 2012
Location: Scotland, United Kingdom
Posts: 325
Status: 
Offline
I like both of them. :-)

 




Posted: Fri Jan 22nd, 2016 04:20
 
89th Post
Robert



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
Thanks Judith, Just a bit torn as to how dark to make it, given how bright the original exposures are it's difficult to make it look like a dark night, yet still show the scene.

Exposure adjustments need to be made before the images are stacked because StarStax only outputs in JPEG, which limits options and quality for final adjustments. After the stacking there is quite a bit of tidying up to do, for some reason the star trails appear to be in front of the tree branches so they need clone work and some of the star trails have gaps which need filling manually, there are also some artefact bright pixels which need cloning out.

I may use Photoshop for my next attempt... Another clamber up Photoshops learning curve!



____________________
Robert.

 




Posted: Fri Jan 22nd, 2016 05:44
 
90th Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6987
Status: 
Offline
Perversely, I prefer the church with star trails but the fells and lake without trails.



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 

Reply
1st new
This is topic ID = 1244     Current time is 13:50 Page:  First Page Previous Page  ...  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next Page Last Page    
Nikon DSLR Forums > Photography > Photography Projects > Aurora Photography Top

Users viewing this topic

Post quick reply

Go to top
Go to end
Messages
Home
Recent topics
Unread posts
Last posts
Splash

Current theme is Modern editor



A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk Thank you.


Hosted by Octarine Services

UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0720 seconds (72% database + 28% PHP). 82 queries executed.