This site requires new users to accept that a small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk after requesting a new account. Thank you.

 Moderated by: chrisbet, Page:  First Page Previous Page  ...  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next Page Last Page  
Film v digital   -   Page   7
 Rate Topic 
AuthorPost



Posted: Sat Sep 5th, 2020 13:18
 
61st Post
Graham Whistler



Joined: Fri Apr 13th, 2012
Location: Fareham, United Kingdom
Posts: 1933
Status: 
Offline
Ths is the front view with the Rolleiflex and FP$

Click here to comment on this image.



____________________
Graham Whistler
 




Posted: Sun Sep 6th, 2020 07:46
 
62nd Post
Iain



Joined: Thu Apr 5th, 2012
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Posts: 1480
Status: 
Offline
I have looked at all the images and I see banding on the D500 images but not on the last one that Graham put up.

 




Posted: Sun Sep 6th, 2020 07:56
 
63rd Post
Graham Whistler



Joined: Fri Apr 13th, 2012
Location: Fareham, United Kingdom
Posts: 1933
Status: 
Offline
It is on this forum and not on any of the images as shot or any of the JPG before they were uploaded. The last D500 image of the bbey uploaded I reprocessed from the NEF just to see if there was any problem with the camera and all is good!



____________________
Graham Whistler
 




Posted: Sun Sep 6th, 2020 15:01
 
64th Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4539
Status: 
Offline
Have you tried reloading the problem images to see if it happens again?
If they are inherent issues with the first images they should reoccur...if they don't exhibit the same issue, it would suggest an upload anomaly.



____________________
Eric
 




Posted: Sun Sep 6th, 2020 17:09
 
65th Post
Graham Whistler



Joined: Fri Apr 13th, 2012
Location: Fareham, United Kingdom
Posts: 1933
Status: 
Offline
Post 197 is reloaded from the first image that showed the banding. I have also checked all the other files and all clean. This is the original JPG but full image.

Click here to comment on this image.



____________________
Graham Whistler
 




Posted: Sun Sep 6th, 2020 17:13
 
66th Post
Graham Whistler



Joined: Fri Apr 13th, 2012
Location: Fareham, United Kingdom
Posts: 1933
Status: 
Offline
This is the original trouble JPG reloaded now.

Click here to comment on this image.



____________________
Graham Whistler
 




Posted: Mon Sep 7th, 2020 03:43
 
67th Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4539
Status: 
Offline
Graham Whistler wrote:
This is the original trouble JPG reloaded now.

Click here to comment on this image.

I can still see banding lines in that image. That suggests something in the original file conversion.



____________________
Eric
 




Posted: Mon Sep 7th, 2020 03:48
 
68th Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4539
Status: 
Offline

Click here to comment on this image.


Boosting the mid tone contrast emphasises the effect and also the halo effect that Robert mentioned. I think something was different on that first nef processing.

I don't know what the effect is. It clearly isn't 'digitally' regular or parallel. It looks like an atmospheric effect that for some reason the first process picked out.

o.O



____________________
Eric
 




Posted: Mon Sep 7th, 2020 04:02
 
69th Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4539
Status: 
Offline
Ok I think it's atmospherics that the first processing emphasised.

This other image is taken from a different angle and if the mid tones are boosted, the lines are there but running at a downward angle. Turn the camera round to the left more (as in the discussed photo) and that would turn the lines more horizontally across the frame.

Just don't know how/why one process highlights it and another doesn't?



Click here to comment on this image.



____________________
Eric
 




Posted: Mon Sep 7th, 2020 05:00
 
70th Post
chrisbet



Joined: Thu Feb 7th, 2019
Location: Leigh On Sea, Essex , United Kingdom
Posts: 1503
Status: 
Offline
It's not under a flight path is it? - Old contrails?



____________________
If it is broken it was probably me ....
 

Reply
1st new
This is topic ID = 1838     Current time is 16:24 Page:  First Page Previous Page  ...  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next Page Last Page    
Nikon DSLR Forums > Photography > Photography > Film v digital Top

Users viewing this topic

Post quick reply

Go to top
Go to end
Messages
Home
Recent topics
Unread posts
Last posts
Splash

Current theme is Modern editor



A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk Thank you.


Hosted by Octarine Services

UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0769 seconds (71% database + 29% PHP). 81 queries executed.