This site requires new users to accept that a small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk after requesting a new account. Thank you. |
Moderated by: chrisbet, | Page: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Film v digital   -   Page   4 | |
Rate Topic |
Author | Post |
---|
Posted: Fri Aug 21st, 2020 15:55 |
|
31st Post |
jk![]() ![]()
![]() |
Graham Whistler wrote:London in 1960 Rollieflex 3.5F Zeiss Planar Lens and Vericome Pan 100 ISA or should say ASA! London, before it was choked with traffic! Great shot Graham.
____________________ Still learning after all these years! https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none |
||||||||
|
Posted: Sat Aug 22nd, 2020 14:59 |
|
32nd Post |
Eric![]() ![]()
![]() |
Graham Whistler wrote:Just to compare quality in 1960 this is a portrait of my uncle Mr FWM Pratt MS FRCS taken by me for The Royal College Surgeons in the Kodak studio again with a 8x10 inch Kodak studio camera with a 14 inch lens and P1600 Glass Plate!!! Terrific portrait, Graham. ousing quality. ![]()
____________________ Eric |
||||||||
|
Posted: Sat Aug 22nd, 2020 15:06 |
|
33rd Post |
Iain![]() ![]()
![]() |
Eric wrote:Terrific portrait, Graham. ousing quality. It is that. Clear and sharp.
|
||||||||
|
Posted: Sun Aug 23rd, 2020 03:49 |
|
34th Post |
Bob Bowen![]() ![]()
![]() |
How times change a doctor pictured smoking and it needed a 10x8 plate to achieve. Excellent image.
____________________ Bob Bowen |
||||||||
|
Posted: Sun Aug 23rd, 2020 05:48 |
|
35th Post |
Graham Whistler![]() ![]()
![]() |
Ian thanks for that you prompted me to look up some early film shots and quality proved to stand up quite well and I scanned the negs on my Epson 4990 Scanner. The photo of my uncle taken on 8x10 plate long lost so that is a scan from a 4x5 copy neg made at the time. I have just shot a roll of FP4 so will post the result when the negs and set of hi res scans come back from the lab. Sorry all this is not Nikon material but hope it is of interest.
____________________ Graham Whistler |
||||||||
|
Posted: Sun Aug 23rd, 2020 11:20 |
|
36th Post |
jk![]() ![]()
![]() |
Graham, when you printed the 8x10 did you do a contact print from the neg or use an enlarger? One of the things I like with my old MPP 5x4 was the fact that a contact print was very easy to make.
____________________ Still learning after all these years! https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none |
||||||||
|
Posted: Sun Aug 23rd, 2020 12:57 |
|
37th Post |
Graham Whistler![]() ![]()
![]() |
No Kodak had a 8x10 enlarger but I made a copy 4x5 neg and am glad I did as there was little loss of quality and I still have the neg and have been able to get a high res scan off it as the picture is important to the family (Sadly he died just three years later smoking did not help). He was very senior in the Royal College of Surgeons and I was asked to take a portrait for their board room when he retired.
____________________ Graham Whistler |
||||||||
|
Posted: Thu Sep 3rd, 2020 09:45 |
|
38th Post |
Graham Whistler![]() ![]()
![]() |
Ian further to the Rolleiflex image with Ilford HP5 400 ISO here is the test again with FP4 125 ISO, This is D500 with 18-140 at 50mm 125ISO 1/250 sec f11![]() Click here to comment on this image.
____________________ Graham Whistler |
||||||||
|
Posted: Thu Sep 3rd, 2020 09:47 |
|
39th Post |
Graham Whistler![]() ![]()
![]() |
![]() This is B&W off above colour image, interesting how much darker the sky is compared to the Rollei pix below. Perhaps should have used orange filter with the Rollie?
____________________ Graham Whistler |
||||||||
|
Posted: Thu Sep 3rd, 2020 09:52 |
|
40th Post |
Graham Whistler![]() ![]()
![]() |
60 yrs later not that much in it. Ian you were right to ask for a look at my old Rolleiflex is with FP4 not bad, but the D500 is clearly better. I did my best to match the two B&W images. ![]() Click here to comment on this image.
____________________ Graham Whistler |
||||||||
|
This is topic ID = 1838 Current time is 00:00 | Page: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Nikon DSLR Forums > Photography > Photography > Film v digital | Top | |
Users viewing this topic |
Current theme is Modern editor
A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk Thank you. |