This site requires new users to accept that a small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk after requesting a new account. Thank you. |
Moderated by: chrisbet, | Page: 1 2 3 ![]() ![]() |
|
Are we getting too hung up about noise and colour accuracy?   -   Page   1 | |
Rate Topic |
Author | Post |
---|
Posted: Fri Feb 8th, 2019 02:44 |
|
1st Post |
Robert![]() ![]()
![]() |
I have just browsed through a list of images from an international garden photographer of the year competition. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/in-pictures-47118130 Many of the images contain significant noise and in some, pastel shades dominate. While they are lovely images, I doubt if they are particularly accurate colour wise. My question is, does this really matter when we are making artistic images. If you examine paintings, even the work of the great masters, brush strokes are plainly visible, they form the image. Film and paper processing uses fine dots to create the image, so why can't digital photography contain some element of noise, as a part of the image. I accept for documentary and product photography, colour accuracy and sharpness are important but does that hold true for artistic photography, with which I believe we are mainly concerned?
____________________ Robert. |
||||||||
|
Posted: Fri Feb 8th, 2019 04:05 |
|
2nd Post |
jk![]() ![]()
![]() |
It is always the picture that matters. The content, light and composition make it. Noise can be distracting.
____________________ Still learning after all these years! https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none |
||||||||
|
Posted: Fri Feb 8th, 2019 04:24 |
|
3rd Post |
Eric![]() ![]()
![]() |
Robert wrote:I have just browsed through a list of images from an international garden photographer of the year competition. You are probably quite right, old sage. ![]() I will try less hard in future. ![]()
____________________ Eric |
||||||||
|
Posted: Fri Feb 8th, 2019 04:48 |
|
4th Post |
Eric![]() ![]()
![]() |
Looking at Iain and Jeffs photos (I am sure they won't mind me saying) one thing leaps out at me. It's the proximity they are to many of their subjects in the images. Their exif data (thank you Flickr) typically gives subject distances of c.6m. They are fortunate having access to 'private' reserves/ special locations which will no doubt be quieter, more intimate with the subject and frankly easier to orchestrate ....on many occasions. With the exception of the recent woodland birds photos, I am normally having to rely on bird 'watching' public hides (RSPB/Wildlife Trust etc) which are geared more for people with binoculars and scopes than meagre length lenses. So typically I am more often 10-15m away, fighting with a dozen other people for the best spot and being frustrated with the disturbing noise they make!! There's a lot more serendipity about these sort of photography situations. As a result the final images are less controlled or predictable. That's my misfortune and it doesn't matter in the context of this thread. But what it means is that the amount of cropping I need to do (given we have similar equipment, lighting etc) and computer processing ....are potentially going to be greater and the side effects of that (less sharp, more noise) inescapable. What I am trying to say, in a rambling sort of way, is that I agree I'm probably thinking too much about noise because the real bonus will come from putting effort into finding better locations and improving field craft such that the subjects need less cropping and hence benefit from less amplification of side effects.
____________________ Eric |
||||||||
|
Posted: Sat Feb 9th, 2019 16:56 |
|
5th Post |
blackfox![]() ![]()
![]() |
Hmmm right and wrong Eric , I live on the virtual edge of the Dee estuary which gives me a vast area to cover .. , for my small bird shots I use a hide on a small reserve that's not that well known and luckily the wildlife trust have allowed us to set it up for photography rather than bird watching ,but this has caused tensions and even full out rows at times, ..for birds of prey and waders I have several fave spots all around the coast which I tend to go to weekdays and when the kids are in school .. some involve walking a lot of the times though I simply use the mobile hide , you got one to 4x4 ... ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
||||||||
|
Posted: Sat Feb 9th, 2019 17:01 |
|
6th Post |
blackfox![]() ![]()
![]() |
like this Eric , background is just grass in bokeh ![]() or this same spot by some gypsy stones in a lay by , hide was a mondeo ![]()
|
||||||||
|
Posted: Sun Feb 10th, 2019 02:03 |
|
7th Post |
Robert![]() ![]()
![]() |
Beautiful images Jeff, good bokeh. Difficult to achieve that in PS. Thanks for the explanations on hides. I have an opportunity to photograph a black and white woodpecker who two or three times a day attacks a telegraph pole, it's in a car park, I am thinking I might sit in the car for the day and try to catch it with the D300 and the 300mm lens. Given my luck it will take the day off! I am trying out the new text edit window, obviously intended for members with poor eyesight! ![]() This is the view from near the telegraph pole. To Chris: It appears there may be a broken link somewhere? This pano image is in my gallery. I dragged and dropped it into the edit window.
____________________ Robert. |
||||||||
|
Posted: Sun Feb 10th, 2019 02:11 |
|
8th Post |
jk![]() ![]()
![]() |
Fantastic detail in those images Jeff. Love the colour and composition. That new lens is working well for you. If you lived closer by I would lend you my D500!
____________________ Still learning after all these years! https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none |
||||||||
|
Posted: Sun Feb 10th, 2019 02:21 |
|
9th Post |
jk![]() ![]()
![]() |
Re the use of bait/food this is very contentious. Many photogragraphers and bird people are against the use of food to bring the birds closer but in reality the birds always go to a food source no matter what. Fieldcraft allows you to get to good locations but there is no guarantee of success if there are the wrong birds there! It is also a question of patience. I am afraid that I prefer using my car/4x4 as it gives me opportunity to have my kit under cover and I dont have to carry it for miles. Also my knowledge of the different birds and their habitat is pretty limited except for some species.
____________________ Still learning after all these years! https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none |
||||||||
|
Posted: Sun Feb 10th, 2019 02:21 |
|
10th Post |
Robert![]() ![]()
![]() |
jk wrote:Fantastic detail in those images Jeff. Another test post, quoting JK. Another attempt to post an image... D200 with Nikkor 300mm f/2.8, @ f/2.8 Much to the distain of the 'pro' who was coaching us, who suggested I should be using f/5.6 at least... ![]() To Chris: I used drag and drip from large image on gallery, displays well in 'modern editor' window. Robert
____________________ Robert. |
||||||||
|
This is topic ID = 1648 Current time is 14:31 | Page: 1 2 3 ![]() ![]() | |
Nikon DSLR Forums > Photography > Photography > Are we getting too hung up about noise and colour accuracy? | Top | |
Users viewing this topic |
Current theme is Modern editor
A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk Thank you. |