| Moderated by: chrisbet, | Page:   1 2 3 4 5   |
|
|||||||
| What is HIGH ISO? - Page 2 | |
| Rate Topic |
| Author | Post |
|---|
| Posted: Wed Dec 26th, 2018 11:29 |
|
11th Post |
jk
|
With the Nikon cameras it also matters hugely which chipset (EXPEED) is in the camera. I always have High ISO noise reduction set to Off. Jeff, are you using Imagenomic Noiseware on the mouse image? I have a copy of it but never used it as I had NoiseNinja then found that in Bibble there were better plugin available but I use Capture One Pro v12 which has all sorts of goodies built in. I took some daylight images today on the Z7 at 6400ISO but also most at ISO800. I will compare results. The Z7, D850, D500 have EXPEED5 chipset. Earlier cameras D4, D750 have Expeed4 and D800, D600, D3 have Expeed3.
____________________ Still learning after all these years! https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Wed Dec 26th, 2018 13:25 |
|
12th Post |
Iain
|
I must be honest, I was avid raw user except for the press/sport when time or lack of it made it the best option. But the D500 has changed that. I now shot jpeg for wildlife having shot the same image in raw and jpeg adjusted them both and found that there was no difference. As for noise I have my D500 set on normal and you have seen the results.
|
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Wed Dec 26th, 2018 14:04 |
|
13th Post |
jk
|
I agree that D500 works well. To be honest I only shoot RAW for best results should I want to make a large enlargement which is infrequent these days. I am wondering if Eric has a sub-standard D500. I dont know how to check.
____________________ Still learning after all these years! https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Wed Dec 26th, 2018 14:05 |
|
14th Post |
blackfox
|
Yes Jonathon I tend to use imageonic n/r on all shots , but lightrooms own de.noise isn't to bad either tbh
|
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Wed Dec 26th, 2018 14:06 |
|
15th Post |
jk
|
Interesting. I will need to investigate Noiseware.
____________________ Still learning after all these years! https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Wed Dec 26th, 2018 15:32 |
|
16th Post |
Robert
|
jk wrote:Interesting. I will need to investigate Noiseware. Take a look at the previous iteration of NIK filters via Lightroom. I understand the current 'paid for' filters have been dumbed down or messed with. The previous version are good.
____________________ Robert. |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Thu Dec 27th, 2018 07:29 |
|
17th Post |
jk
|
Gardens of Heligan, Cornwall. Light show. No noise reduction on these images.  Attachment: Z7-1-0933.jpg (Downloaded 18 times)
____________________ Still learning after all these years! https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Thu Dec 27th, 2018 07:30 |
|
18th Post |
jk
|
Another one. Attachment: Z7-1-0961.jpg (Downloaded 18 times)
____________________ Still learning after all these years! https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Thu Dec 27th, 2018 07:31 |
|
19th Post |
jk
|
All shot on Z7 at ISO6400, 1/60th or there abouts f4. Attachment: Z7-1-0971.jpg (Downloaded 18 times)
____________________ Still learning after all these years! https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Thu Dec 27th, 2018 08:52 |
|
20th Post |
Eric
|
Robert wrote:Just passing... Not sure if that remark was addressed to me or Jeff? I HAVE been shooting raw on recent images and there's no difference in the outputted image quality to computer. There is nothing wrong with saving files as JPEGs. The whole publishing industry demands the supply of images in JPEGs format. Send a NEF file to a magazine and they will reject it. In fact these days they frequently want png files. The whole point about raw files is they enable YOU to make whatever corrections you think need doing ....corrections that you or the camera didn't do at the time of the exposure. My point is ...the captured images are not good enough irrespective of file format. The risk with compressed files is the degree and repeated application of this compression by repeated resaving. In my early years of supplying digital artwork I did repeated and exhaustive test on the effect on quality of the degree of jpeg compression and multiple circles thereof. I fear the jpeg is not the bogeyman many would have us believe. Of course it's not good practise to save part processed WIP images in any compressed format. But there's nothing wrong in saving finished files in jpeg. Arguably thts what the camera assumes you require...a finished jpeg. Just my experience 
____________________ Eric |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| This is topic ID = 1625 Current time is 12:03 | Page: 1 2 3 4 5 | |
| Nikon DSLR Forums > Photography > Photography > What is HIGH ISO? | Top | |
Users viewing this topic |
||
Current theme is Modern editor
| A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk Thank you. |
Hosted by Octarine Services
UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0655 seconds (65% database + 35% PHP). 83 queries executed.
UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0655 seconds (65% database + 35% PHP). 83 queries executed.