This site requires new users to accept that a small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk after requesting a new account. Thank you.

 Moderated by: chrisbet, Page:    1  2  Next Page Last Page  
Flying visit to Ness Gardens on the Wirral   -   Page   1
May 2018  Rate Topic 
AuthorPost



Posted: Thu May 17th, 2018 04:18
 
1st Post
Robert



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
On my way back home from Frampton RSPB I visited ness Gardens, the day was perfect, slight wind but for a casual session that didn't matter too much.

I had wanted to see if I could catch the peris formosa Forrestii at it's peak. I wasn't disappointed although I am now kicking myself for not using the tripod which I had with me in the car. Because of the lighting, quite sunny, I bracketed most of my exposures, hand held not ideal.

Anyway, enough excuses, here are my photo's from almost 500 shots. Taken with D3, ISO 400, Nikkor 24-120 f/4.0.





This is perhaps my favourite plant, spectacular yet so delicate. Discovered by George Forrest during his thirty years in the Hindo Chinese, Tibetan region searching for plants to send back to his employer, Arthur Kingpin Bulley, who owned Bees nurseries near Chester. This example is one of three surviving from the original shipment of seeds sent home by Forrest. My framing leaves a little to be desired...



What possessed the garden to put a grey wooden box right in the middle of such a picturesque scene I don't know. I refrained from cloning it out.



A lovely Iris.



Another view.



Cotoneaster Corokia.










A view of the rockery garden.



As with most of the others, this is an HDR image from three exposures, suffering slightly from wind movement between the exposures.



The splendid Laburnum arch. Laburnum X Vossii Leguminosae




Thanks for looking!



____________________
Robert.

 




Posted: Thu May 17th, 2018 14:45
 
2nd Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4529
Status: 
Offline
Robert wrote:
On my way back home from Frampton RSPB I visited ness Gardens, the day was perfect, slight wind but for a casual session that didn't matter too much.

I had wanted to see if I could catch the peris formosa Forrestii at it's peak. I wasn't disappointed although I am now kicking myself for not using the tripod which I had with me in the car. Because of the lighting, quite sunny, I bracketed most of my exposures, hand held not ideal.

Anyway, enough excuses, here are my photo's from almost 500 shots. Taken with D3, ISO 400, Nikkor 24-120 f/4.0.





This is perhaps my favourite plant, spectacular yet so delicate. Discovered by George Forrest during his thirty years in the Hindo Chinese, Tibetan region searching for plants to send back to his employer, Arthur Kingpin Bulley, who owned Bees nurseries near Chester. This example is one of three surviving from the original shipment of seeds sent home by Forrest. My framing leaves a little to be desired...



What possessed the garden to put a grey wooden box right in the middle of such a picturesque scene I don't know. I refrained from cloning it out.



A lovely Iris.



Another view.



Cotoneaster Corokia.










A view of the rockery garden.



As with most of the others, this is an HDR image from three exposures, suffering slightly from wind movement between the exposures.



The splendid Laburnum arch. Laburnum X Vossii Leguminosae




Thanks for looking!


You've really got the hang of that D3.
:bowing:



____________________
Eric
 




Posted: Thu May 17th, 2018 14:52
 
3rd Post
Robert



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
Thank you Eric, I love my D3!

I like the 24-120 too, nice lens.

I still can't really understand why Graham's TC1.4 wouldn't fit the 70-300.



____________________
Robert.

 




Posted: Thu May 17th, 2018 15:10
 
4th Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4529
Status: 
Offline
Robert wrote:
Thank you Eric, I love my D3!

I like the 24-120 too, nice lens.

I still can't really understand why Graham's TC1.4 wouldn't fit the 70-300.


Will have another try with Mikes 70-300...it's same as yours.



____________________
Eric
 




Posted: Thu May 17th, 2018 16:05
 
5th Post
Robert



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
Thanks Eric, perhaps you can figure what the impediment is?



____________________
Robert.

 




Posted: Fri May 18th, 2018 01:02
 
6th Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6965
Status: 
Offline
Nikon have put spoilers on some of their old TCs in the past so luke as not it is the same with the new one. What version of the 70-300 do you have Robert?
S/N and full lens details should identify it.
What version of TC is it x1.4 and what model number?



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Fri May 18th, 2018 01:07
 
7th Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6965
Status: 
Offline
More info here.
https://photo.stackexchange.com/questions/94170/nikon-teleconverter-compatibility
https://www.nikonusa.com/en/learn-and-explore/a/tips-and-techniques/using-teleconverters.html

Notice last line of Nikon USA link!



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Fri May 18th, 2018 02:52
 
8th Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6965
Status: 
Offline
I am sure that Graham wont like this done to his TC.
http://tedbyrne.com/site/2015/11/nikon-tc-14e-ii-mod/

However I personally think that Nikon should be aware that making a new component incompatible with older lenses is not a 'clever' thing to do.



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Fri May 18th, 2018 05:32
 
9th Post
Robert



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
jk wrote:
What version of the 70-300 do you have Robert?
S/N and full lens details should identify it.


SWM VR WD IF ˜67 S/N: 2966088

What version of TC is it x1.4 and what model number?

Don't know but I think it's recent new. Eric's certainly is.

They looked like they should fit but simply wouldn't come together. Messing with other peoples lenses when there was action outside with birds coming and going wasn't really an option, nowhere to place things safely, pictures to take. Last thing I wanted was a scratched element on Grahams TC or something dropped, so we let it go.

However, I had been wondering about a 1.4TC for the 70-300, because with the D300S it could approach something half useful. I think an X2 TC would be a step too far. I suppose I should have kept my 400mm f/3.5 but it was a big heavy beast and not that much longer than the 300mm.

Like I say I think 600mm is minimum for birds in that situation, unless you get very lucky.



____________________
Robert.

 




Posted: Fri May 18th, 2018 05:51
 
10th Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4529
Status: 
Offline
Robert wrote:
jk wrote:
What version of the 70-300 do you have Robert?
S/N and full lens details should identify it.


SWM VR WD IF ˜67 S/N: 2966088

What version of TC is it x1.4 and what model number?

Don't know but I think it's recent new. Eric's certainly is.

They looked like they should fit but simply wouldn't come together. Messing with other peoples lenses when there was action outside with birds coming and going wasn't really an option, nowhere to place things safely, pictures to take. Last thing I wanted was a scratched element on Grahams TC or something dropped, so we let it go.

However, I had been wondering about a 1.4TC for the 70-300, because with the D300S it could approach something half useful. I think an X2 TC would be a step too far. I suppose I should have kept my 400mm f/3.5 but it was a big heavy beast and not that much longer than the 300mm.

Like I say I think 600mm is minimum for birds in that situation, unless you get very lucky.


Mike was using a Kenko 3000 1.4tc with his 70-300

He says that the iq is very good but the minimum aperture of f8 it causes can make the lens slower to lock on focus.

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Kenko-Teleplus-PRO-300-N-AFD-DG-1-4x-teleconverter-Nikon-GENUINE/351938046861?epid=880218258&hash=item51f1246b8d:g:1Y0AAOSwux5YWYsW

Actually ..it was my tc not Graham's we were trying to fit on your lens so its brand new. I will check it on mikes lens when we next meet....but it could be some weeks. It may have been just poor manual dexterity on the day.



____________________
Eric
 

Reply
1st new
This is topic ID = 1535     Current time is 10:39 Page:    1  2  Next Page Last Page    
Nikon DSLR Forums > Photography > Photography > Flying visit to Ness Gardens on the Wirral Top

Users viewing this topic

Post quick reply

Go to top
Go to end
Messages
Home
Recent topics
Unread posts
Last posts
Splash

Current theme is Modern editor



A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk Thank you.


Hosted by Octarine Services

UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0614 seconds (65% database + 35% PHP). 86 queries executed.