| Moderated by: chrisbet, | Page:   1 2 3 4 5 6   |
|
|||||||
| Fuji XE1 IR - Page 4 | |
Rating: 
|
| Author | Post |
|---|
| Posted: Mon May 19th, 2014 14:14 |
|
31st Post |
Eric
|
thanks jk will see what I can upload..... answer nothing!!! for some reason either this laptop or the wifi service wont let me upload 500k jpegs?????  this wifi must be painfully slow. I am trying to upload 9x 500k files to my dropbox and it says 10mins!!!! will posst link to dropbox in ....10mins lol perhaps you will then post the files?
____________________ Eric |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Mon May 19th, 2014 14:48 |
|
32nd Post |
Eric
|
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/5rj32t3igtmt4e2/AACUIeUSbn_cu9ffgF1D6UTta focal length can we deduced by field of view .....the smaller the fstop the more horrid f4..f8...f16 don't have NIGHTMARES Jonathan 
____________________ Eric |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Mon May 19th, 2014 17:16 |
|
33rd Post |
jk
|
OK got the files down on my machine. I will take a look at them tomorrow afternoon. Initial look the hotspot is nasty as it is dual when you get to f8 and beyond.
____________________ Still learning after all these years! https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Tue May 20th, 2014 02:59 |
|
34th Post |
Eric
|
jk wrote:OK got the files down on my machine. I will take a look at them tomorrow afternoon. Yes. I found that quite intriquing. Why 2? It must tell us something about HOW it's caused. Is it the curvature of the rear glass?
____________________ Eric |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Sun Jun 15th, 2014 14:19 |
|
35th Post |
Eric
|
I've posted some IR images taken recently with the Fuji XE1, in my gallery. To over come the hotspot on some I had to shoot a panorama series, thus moving the central hotspot in each image off centre, and then overlaying the images so that the hotspots were covered by the next image.
____________________ Eric |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Mon Jun 16th, 2014 09:11 |
|
36th Post |
amazing50
|
Eric, when you use the viewfinder on your converted camera, are the immages dark red as they are on a DSLR with a 720nm filter on the front of the lens?
____________________ There is nothing worse than a sharp image of a fuzzy concept ;~) Mike Grace |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Mon Jun 16th, 2014 10:25 |
|
37th Post |
Eric
|
amazing50 wrote:Eric, when you use the viewfinder on your converted camera, are the immages dark red as they are on a DSLR with a 720nm filter on the front of the lens? They are sepia tinted 'normally' illuminated in the viewfinder. Without a white balance correction (ie making a custom white balance from green foliage) the image is red...but not dark red. I always shoot some grass in full sun and save the wb as default. The colour temperature varies a bit around the year, but as long as I don't do it in low autumn light or late in the day, the wb is usually good enough.
____________________ Eric |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Mon Jun 16th, 2014 15:22 |
|
38th Post |
jk
|
Eric, So some of the IR images from your holiday are not at all badly effected by the hotspot.  What are your thoughts on the use of the IR converted XE1 ? Is it as good or better than the D200? I think that you need to test with a Fuji 14mm .
____________________ Still learning after all these years! https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Tue Jun 17th, 2014 03:23 |
|
39th Post |
Eric
|
jk wrote:Eric, So some of the IR images from your holiday are not at all badly effected by the hotspot. The XE is a very good performer and a definite lightweight alternative to the D200. It really all boils down to the lens. If the 14mm has no hotspot (on a converted camera) then it at least gives me a wide landscape option. BUT...with the 18-55 performing so poorly it leaves a big gap in the focal length range. With the D200 I use the 17-35 ( 25-53mm equiv) almost exclusively. I've never felt the lack of a wider or longer lens! I am loathed to ADD more lenses to the Fuji range, as the whole point of this change is reducing weight and complexity when travelling. I need to go back through my IR images and establish the percentage shot at each focal length. It may give me a steer towards where to go. But there is no doubt I need to take the XE over to WEX and try all Fuji X lenses for hot spots before committing more cash. Wouldn't it be great if the humble 16-50 (24-75) didn't have a hotspot? Maybe next week when I have my new vehicle.
____________________ Eric |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Tue Jun 17th, 2014 04:18 |
|
40th Post |
jk
|
Looks like you need to test the 14mm and 35mm primes. I have 14, 18, 35, 56, 60, 18-55, 55-200 lenses. I will come to UK in September and you can have a test then if you dont get to Wex before!
____________________ Still learning after all these years! https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| This is topic ID = 946 Current time is 06:14 | Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 | |
| Nikon DSLR Forums > Camera and Lens Forums > Cameras > Fuji XE1 IR | Top | |
Users viewing this topic |
||
Current theme is Modern editor
| A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk Thank you. |
Hosted by Octarine Services
UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0661 seconds (68% database + 32% PHP). 83 queries executed.
UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0661 seconds (68% database + 32% PHP). 83 queries executed.