This site requires new users to accept that a small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk after requesting a new account. Thank you.

 Moderated by: chrisbet, Page:    1  2  Next Page Last Page  
D5200 released   -   Page   1
 Rate Topic 
AuthorPost



Posted: Tue Nov 6th, 2012 02:28
 
1st Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6993
Status: 
Offline
Well no Nikon D400 this year. Instead we have a D5200 which is a 24MP camera.
http://nikonrumors.com/2012/11/05/nikon-d5200-and-wr-r10wr-t10-wireless-remote-controller-anoouncements.aspx/



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Tue Nov 6th, 2012 11:32
 
2nd Post
Iain



Joined: Thu Apr 5th, 2012
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Posts: 1490
Status: 
Offline
Me thinks that the D400 my never arrive as I can see a replacement for the D7000 being the top DX body.

 




Posted: Tue Nov 6th, 2012 11:37
 
3rd Post
Squarerigger



Joined: Wed Apr 4th, 2012
Location: Goose Creek, South Carolina USA
Posts: 418
Status: 
Offline
I thought I heard a loud cry of anguish from way up north - could be ArticRick :needsahug:



____________________
--------------------------------------------
Gary
 




Posted: Tue Nov 6th, 2012 13:41
 
4th Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6993
Status: 
Offline
I do feel for those who really are waiting for a D7000 or D300 replacement.
Logically the next release period is just into January 2013 for the CES show or maybe later for the PMA show in April.



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Tue Nov 6th, 2012 14:28
 
5th Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4583
Status: 
Offline
jk wrote:
I do feel for those who really are waiting for a D7000 or D300 replacement.


And yet, the D7000 and D300 take excellent photos. So while some wait for replacements, many are using the current offerings successfully.



____________________
Eric
 




Posted: Tue Nov 6th, 2012 14:57
 
6th Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6993
Status: 
Offline
I find my D300 much less 'good' a camera than my D700.
I think it is one of those things where I just dont know what it is but it doesnt seem to ever yield as good a result as my D3, D3s, D700.

Just me I guess.
It is not a DX thing as I get very good results from my X100, Xpro1, D1X and D70.



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Tue Nov 6th, 2012 14:58
 
7th Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6993
Status: 
Offline
I find my D300 much less 'good' a camera than my D700.
I think it is one of those things where I just dont know what it is but it doesnt seem to ever yield as good a result as my D3, D3s, D700.

Just me I guess.
It is not a DX thing as I get very good results from my X100, XPro1, D1X and D70.



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Tue Nov 6th, 2012 15:21
 
8th Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4583
Status: 
Offline
jk wrote:
I find my D300 much less 'good' a camera than my D700.
I think it is one of those things where I just dont know what it is but it doesnt seem to ever yield as good a result as my D3, D3s, D700.

Just me I guess.
It is not a DX thing as I get very good results from my X100, XPro1, D1X and D70.


I think it WAS a DX thing.
The D300 was a step up from the D2X, but the D3/D700 was a double step up ...due to the FX sensor. The D300 always was inferior to the other two, but it's magnification effect diminished the impact.

I don't disagree with your observation. I sold my D300 because of this.
The problem is that the D7000 ( the next best DX camera ) isn't as fast at focusing as the D300.



____________________
Eric
 




Posted: Tue Nov 6th, 2012 16:55
 
9th Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6993
Status: 
Offline
Interesting that you had a similar experience with the D300.

It wasnt an IQ thing exactly nor handling but I never seemed to be able to get the hi ISO performance I wanted (only 1 stop difference but 1600 compared to 3200ISO) from the D300 compared to the D700 so I was always compromising.

In sunny conditions no problem!



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Wed Nov 7th, 2012 03:36
 
10th Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4583
Status: 
Offline
jk wrote: Interesting that you had a similar experience with the D300.

It wasnt an IQ thing exactly nor handling but I never seemed to be able to get the hi ISO performance I wanted (only 1 stop difference but 1600 compared to 3200ISO) from the D300 compared to the D700 so I was always compromising.

In sunny conditions no problem!

I suspect the problem was it was always going to be compared to the D3 and D700 (especially with the latter's body similarity). Had it been launched on its own, like the D7000, we would have been less hypercritical.

For me it was perfectly noise free in daylight up to 2000...which when viewed from a 'film days' perspective is quite remarkable.  And one perhaps should say ...'that's more than good enough'. But for indoor and specialist shooting it might not be.

At the time I did say that it probably would be the last pro DX body for sometime (if ever!), and current trends seem to confim that.


But then, what makes a 'pro' body these days?


For me its the speed of response, particularly focusing. I am not to bothered about robust titanium (or whatever) bodies as I dont mistreat mine like press pool bodies use to be.

If they were to just speed up the D7000 responsivness I bet the D7X00 would fulfill most pro DX needs.








____________________
Eric
 

Reply
1st new
This is topic ID = 387     Current time is 07:11 Page:    1  2  Next Page Last Page    
Nikon DSLR Forums > Camera and Lens Forums > Cameras > D5200 released Top

Users viewing this topic

Post quick reply

Go to top
Go to end
Messages
Home
Recent topics
Unread posts
Last posts
Splash

Current theme is Modern editor



A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk Thank you.


Hosted by Octarine Services

UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0613 seconds (65% database + 35% PHP). 83 queries executed.