| Moderated by: chrisbet, | Page:   1 2 |
|
|||||||
| D300s ???? - Page 2 | |
| Rate Topic |
| Author | Post |
|---|
| Posted: Mon Oct 15th, 2012 03:34 |
|
11th Post |
blackfox
|
its the 300mm f4 jonathan basically the only lens i use .the distance to the bullfinch is 16 feet and to the magpie 26 ft
|
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Mon Oct 15th, 2012 06:34 |
|
12th Post |
Squarerigger
|
Really great photos. That D300s and 300mm work seem to work well together. And of course the fellow behind the camera has to be commended also. So, has the D300s taken over as your go to camera over the D7000?
____________________ -------------------------------------------- Gary |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Mon Oct 15th, 2012 09:24 |
|
13th Post |
blackfox
|
its certainly looking that way gary ,the a/f and burst rate alone more than compensate for a few lost megapixels .got a grabbed burst of a buzzard last thing today that shows the potential of it .i suppose if and when they produce a d400 and hopefully incorporate the best of both cameras we will have a wildlife ideal rig.
|
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Mon Oct 15th, 2012 13:37 |
|
14th Post |
Squarerigger
|
I keep looking at the two photos and wonder why we need more than 12 MP's? I certainly have no idea why we need 30+MP's.
____________________ -------------------------------------------- Gary |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Mon Oct 15th, 2012 14:56 |
|
15th Post |
Robert
|
We don't. I have been beating this drum for ages but people keep buying higher and higher Mp cameras so Nikon thinks that's good for business and keep making them. That has to be good for business. In practical terms ultra high def is only needed if images are to be taken to bill board sized prints and retain good detail. I will admit my 2.7Mp D1 was a bit low res, but only if you wanted small crops. Otherwise the 2.7Mp camera is still capable of good images, I have some large prints from the D1 which are fine. For the first year or so after I got my D200 I set the resolution to about 5Mp because it was too big a jump for me all thew way from 2.7 to whatever the D200 does at full res, I can't even remember, all I know is the output is good enough for what I want.
____________________ Robert. |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Mon Oct 15th, 2012 15:38 |
|
16th Post |
jk
|
I agree which is why I will be keeping my D3 and D3S. The D700 is for sale if there is a buyer in EU but logically the D600 will reduce interest. My D300 is of use where I want the x1.5 multiplier effect. The D800 is also useful where I need high quality blowups for publicity posters.
____________________ Still learning after all these years! https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| This is topic ID = 355 Current time is 11:53 | Page: 1 2 | |
| Nikon DSLR Forums > Camera and Lens Forums > Cameras > D300s ???? | Top | |
Users viewing this topic |
||
Current theme is Modern editor
| A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk Thank you. |
Hosted by Octarine Services
UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0471 seconds (67% database + 33% PHP). 60 queries executed.
UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0471 seconds (67% database + 33% PHP). 60 queries executed.