| Moderated by: chrisbet, | Page:   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9   |
|
|||||||
| D600 news - Page 6 | |
| Rate Topic |
| Author | Post |
|---|
| Posted: Thu Sep 13th, 2012 04:55 |
|
51st Post |
Ed Hutchinson
|
B&H photo just advertised a d600 to arrive and ship on sept 19th. body only $2099.95 and with a 24-85 vr lens at 2699.95 way too steep for me But one can dream:negativenod:  Ed
____________________ R.O.C.E.D. retired old cranky extremely dangerous! |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Thu Sep 13th, 2012 05:19 |
|
52nd Post |
blackfox
|
hmmm just been through the catalogue /brochure cheers j/k and to all appearances it looks like a slightly upgraded d7000 ,higher mp ,full frame but same size ? ,39 point af no change there .in fact the viewfinder for a full frame has dropped from the lovely round one to a standard rectangle .there will be a few points that make it slightly different but i feel a bit let down by this certainly not a wildlife camera at 5.5 frames per sec . i am leaning more and more towards getting a sony there body range is really moving on (while using the same sensors as nikon) and most have built in i.s to .plus mega fast a.f and frame rates the only thing holding me back is there lens selection .i will make my choices in the coming months
|
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Thu Sep 13th, 2012 08:33 |
|
53rd Post |
Dave Groen
|
Now available for pre-order. Expected availability: September 19 (per B&H) $2100 body-only. http://bhpho.to/Oitm4l $2700 with 24-85 f/3.5-4.5 VR Lens http://bhpho.to/OitSzo Edit- Oops, just noticed that Ed just posted the same basic info, but my post has links so I contributed in some small way to the discussion.
____________________ I started out with nothing and still have most of it left |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Thu Sep 13th, 2012 09:35 |
|
54th Post |
jk
|
blackfox wrote: hmmm just been through the catalogue /brochure cheers j/k and to all appearances it looks like a slightly upgraded d7000 ,higher mp ,full frame but same size ? ,39 point af no change there .in fact the viewfinder for a full frame has dropped from the lovely round one to a standard rectangle .there will be a few points that make it slightly different but i feel a bit let down by this certainly not a wildlife camera at 5.5 frames per sec . But AF to f8 (not f5.6 like on D7000) and faster/very good AF at that. Sony dont have the lens ranges that Nikon have. No way would I do that move. If I moved from Nikon then it would be to Canon.
____________________ Still learning after all these years! https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Thu Sep 13th, 2012 13:03 |
|
55th Post |
blackfox
|
thought it over checked out prices and i'll stick with nikon ,its just that sony seem to be the only company at present offering fast burst rates ,i don't do to bad with what i got though ,so till the magic fairy dumps some money in my wallet its keep dreaming 
|
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Thu Sep 13th, 2012 16:28 |
|
56th Post |
Doug
|
Robert wrote:
Most of us really don't need the performance of CF (SD performance is fantastic these days), twin CF slots would never happen in a camera of this size, SD cards are Much cheaper and most modern devices require additional hardware to work with CF I'm very happy about the twin SD slots (in fact I consider this a plus compared to the 1 each CF/SD of the D800 etc.) Nevertheless, due to features like the limited bracketing range I will probably skip it (I might even grab a D300S if I can get a good deal)
____________________ Recent & Popular posts ProCapture | Genius on Demand Blog |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Thu Sep 13th, 2012 16:53 |
|
57th Post |
Graham Whistler
|
I still think they should have gone for a D400 DX Camera,why this? There is still a lot of advantages of using the more compact DX lenses with larger focal length range.
____________________ Graham Whistler |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Thu Sep 13th, 2012 17:21 |
|
58th Post |
Robert
|
Graham Whistler wrote:I still think they should have gone for a D400 DX Camera,why this? There is still a lot of advantages of using the more compact DX lenses with larger focal length range. It's an entry level FX body, that's why Graham. Perhaps the D3/D700 combo were to close for comfort. Is this INSTEAD of a D400? Surely there will be a D400 too?
____________________ Robert. |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Thu Sep 13th, 2012 18:03 |
|
59th Post |
Ray Ninness
|
I'll continue to rely on my D700's. they seem to do anything I need done, these days???
____________________ Ray Ninness F8Photos.com Bedford, New Hampshire USA |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Thu Sep 13th, 2012 21:44 |
|
60th Post |
richw
|
blackfox wrote:thought it over checked out prices and i'll stick with nikon ,its just that sony seem to be the only company at present offering fast burst rates ,i don't do to bad with what i got though ,so till the magic fairy dumps some money in my wallet its keep dreaming Do you need a high burst rate for wildlife? I thought that was the preserve of sports/journalist? A mate of mine has a Sony, the focus is horrible compared to any of my Nikons.
|
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| This is topic ID = 304 Current time is 07:43 | Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | |
| Nikon DSLR Forums > Camera and Lens Forums > Cameras > D600 news | Top | |
Users viewing this topic |
||
Current theme is Modern editor
| A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk Thank you. |
Hosted by Octarine Services
UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0755 seconds (70% database + 30% PHP). 84 queries executed.
UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0755 seconds (70% database + 30% PHP). 84 queries executed.