This site requires new users to accept that a small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk after requesting a new account. Thank you.

 Moderated by: chrisbet, Page:    1  2  3  Next Page Last Page  
FX under 2 grand new ???   -   Page   1
 Rate Topic 
AuthorPost



Posted: Wed Jun 13th, 2012 17:58
 
1st Post
ArcticRick



Joined: Wed Apr 4th, 2012
Location: Wasilla , Alaska USA
Posts: 121
Status: 
Offline
Anyone think we are going to see the price of an FX body under 2 grand ? That I my limit mentally since I'm no pro .



____________________
Writer/Gear Reviewer @http://www.theloadoutroom.com
 




Posted: Thu Jun 14th, 2012 02:07
 
2nd Post
Robert



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
Maybe...

http://mansurovs.com/is-nikon-d600-on-the-horizon.



____________________
Robert.

 




Posted: Thu Jun 14th, 2012 02:43
 
3rd Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6993
Status: 
Offline
I think that $2000 might be the price point for the new D600.
http://nikonrumors.com/2012/06/14/first-leaked-nikon-d600-images.aspx/



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Thu Jun 14th, 2012 06:55
 
4th Post
Squarerigger



Joined: Wed Apr 4th, 2012
Location: Goose Creek, South Carolina USA
Posts: 418
Status: 
Offline
If the D600 is real, and priced under $2K, I am beginning to wonder if a D400 will ever be seen. o.O

An FX body under $2K would be awfully tempting.



____________________
--------------------------------------------
Gary
 




Posted: Thu Jun 14th, 2012 07:11
 
5th Post
Robert



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
You are not alone there Gary.

It can be argued either way.

I always considered serious Digital cameras would eventually go back to the 35mm film format. But, it's been so long coming that DX has carved a niche, to the point where Digital DX is equal IQ to film and FX has surpassed films resolving power.

The obvious advantages of DX are cost and the lens multiplication factor, with a slight improvement in depth of focus.



____________________
Robert.

 




Posted: Thu Jun 14th, 2012 07:42
 
6th Post
Squarerigger



Joined: Wed Apr 4th, 2012
Location: Goose Creek, South Carolina USA
Posts: 418
Status: 
Offline
I would like to be able to go FX one day if the price point drops to my consumer ability. Even though I have a DX body, most of my few lenses are full frame so it would not be as much of a sting to switch. I have dreamed of having a FX and a Nikon 24-70 f2.8 attached. I have the lens just need the body. I figure over the next couple of years as all this DX/FX gets sorted out, I will have the funds set aside to move. I get the feeling DX will be entry level in the not too distant future.



____________________
--------------------------------------------
Gary
 




Posted: Thu Jun 14th, 2012 08:16
 
7th Post
Robert



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
Well, there are distinct advantages with DX but I have always tended to buy FX capable lenses, because I looked on DX as a temporary workaround while Nikon and their sensor suppliers figured how to make a good, cost effective FX body.

I don't like the small format particularly but it does save big bucks at the long end for lenses. A 450mm f 2.8 isn't even made, if it were, I hate to think what it would cost.

I would keep a foot in both camps, FX for quality and wide to normal, short tele, say up to 180-200mm and DX for leisure photography and longer stuff.



____________________
Robert.

 




Posted: Thu Jun 14th, 2012 08:30
 
8th Post
Squarerigger



Joined: Wed Apr 4th, 2012
Location: Goose Creek, South Carolina USA
Posts: 418
Status: 
Offline
Point well taken Robert. I don't think I would part with my D7000 because my Nikon 70-300 gives me great pics and lets me reach out for a very minimal cost.

Looks like we are in the same boat.

I have gotten to the point where I treat camera bodies like computers, I will skip every few generations as I am not in the photography business and what I have now satisfies my hobby very well. As I get older, less is more in most cases.



____________________
--------------------------------------------
Gary
 




Posted: Thu Jun 14th, 2012 08:49
 
9th Post
Robert



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
I am retiring completely in less than a month, so I won't be able to save up, it will be a matter of the occasional windfall that may come my way from now on.

My D200 and the recent D3100 serve me well, if I can find a cheap D700 in the next year or two that will probably be my route, unless of course I find a rough but working D3? I was offered one recently but it had a sensor fault, the asking price was £1000.



____________________
Robert.

 




Posted: Thu Jun 14th, 2012 11:12
 
10th Post
KenRay



Joined: Wed Apr 4th, 2012
Location: Green Valley, Arizona USA
Posts: 65
Status: 
Offline
I am constantly amazed at the increased cost of cameras today. I like pro quality equipment and when I was employed always managed to afford it. Leica's and Hasselblads were my preferred tools. When SLR's came about I could finally manage to do what I had always wanted to and that was afford long lenses as most everything was ,of course, manual focus. When auto focus finally became a reality film was on it's last legs so I never changed. When Digital became King I was very reluctant to change ,but I did finally but found to satisfy my desire for Pro level bodies and long lense preferences I should stay with DX bodies. I started digital with D1x's and have now progressed to D2x's which at my age will probably be the last bodies I buy if they last. They somewhat satisfy my desire for long lenses though REALLY long lenses such as the Nikkor 600mm are far beyond my wildest reach. It seems to acheive the finest quality photos today you require the best pro level body and highest quality lense to achieve this quality of image. When you consider the top of the line Nikon body is in the $6000 range and the 600mm Nikkor is about the same you are talking about a goodly part of my ANNUAL income so there is no way I can afford it. They have to get prices considerably under $2000 for a body for me to have any interest at all no matter whether FX or DX. Of course this will never happen and in actuality I find it difficult to achieve much interst in photograpy as I once had. That's probably a combination of old age and lack of skill in digital taking it's toll.



____________________
Kenneth Ray
 

Reply
1st new
This is topic ID = 214     Current time is 23:57 Page:    1  2  3  Next Page Last Page    
Nikon DSLR Forums > Camera and Lens Forums > Cameras > FX under 2 grand new ??? Top

Users viewing this topic

Post quick reply

Go to top
Go to end
Messages
Home
Recent topics
Unread posts
Last posts
Splash

Current theme is Modern editor



A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk Thank you.


Hosted by Octarine Services

UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0575 seconds (63% database + 37% PHP). 80 queries executed.