This site requires new users to accept that a small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk after requesting a new account. Thank you.

 Moderated by: chrisbet, Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2  3   
FX under 2 grand new ???   -   Page   3
 Rate Topic 
AuthorPost



Posted: Sat Jun 16th, 2012 07:18
 
21st Post
richw



Joined: Tue Apr 10th, 2012
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 525
Status: 
Offline
jk wrote:
Rich sounds like I need to come out to Oz again and we can go ou shooting. Some up country stuff but also in town!

Sounds good!

 




Posted: Sat Jun 16th, 2012 08:09
 
22nd Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6993
Status: 
Offline
Eric wrote:
The phrases "good enough" and "fit for purpose" spring to mind....because I too am using the wife's D7000 (with zoom lenses) and the X100 more and more. That's mainly because my photography has changed to more casual, holiday, happy snapper mode. Sure one tries to get the best angle and composition. But too often the light is dictated by the time of day you happen to be there and the overal image appearance by the number of people in shot! Nothing is worse than visiting supposed picturesque locations...to find yellow no parking lines, wheelie bins and sky dishes to spoil the image. Sure they can be digitised out...but even I am starting to say why bother? The truth is we need a project to focus our finer photographer skills. Like Eds insects, Roberts flowers, there needs to be more than just recording an event. Until I discover a new challenge, my D3 will be consigned to periodic work shoots. I have two next week....so after not using it for 6weeks I better get it out and remember how to use it. :-)
I glad that someone else feels this way as well.

I really think that there is an 'over-use' of Photoshop to cartoon everything so it looks either fancifully lit with golden false tones, no lines, signs and blemishes.  Whilst the image looks 'perfect' for a magazine but it also looks false to the world.  This is something that the photo magazines seem to promote as it is part of their 'Learn Photoshop in ten easy lessons'.  

Composition and personal style has been reduced to a point where every picture looks the same or similar.  

I know it is a question of balance and striking that balance is so difficult.
 :seesaw:



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 

Reply
1st new
This is topic ID = 214     Current time is 01:48 Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2  3     
Nikon DSLR Forums > Camera and Lens Forums > Cameras > FX under 2 grand new ??? Top

Users viewing this topic

Post quick reply

Go to top
Go to end
Messages
Home
Recent topics
Unread posts
Last posts
Splash

Current theme is Modern editor



A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk Thank you.


Hosted by Octarine Services

UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0349 seconds (66% database + 34% PHP). 42 queries executed.