This site requires new users to accept that a small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk after requesting a new account. Thank you.

 Moderated by: chrisbet, Page:    1  2  3  Next Page Last Page  
And so a Zf   -   Page   1
 Rate Topic 
AuthorPost



Posted: Mon Nov 27th, 2023 14:46
 
1st Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6993
Status: 
Offline
After using the Z9 for a while I have to say that many of the features are very nice and I really got back into using my Nikons again.  I then decided that I had to have a camera that was smaller.   So I looked for something closer to my Fuji XT5 which I really like.  So to be kind to me Nikon have released and I purchased a nice new Zf. 
The Nikon Zf has all the AF speed that I have been accustomed to on my Nikons from before and in fact is pretty close to the Z9 in this respect.  It also has a real advantage in that it is considerably lighter than my Z9 but not as light unfortunately as my XT5.

There is a very nice B&W mode as well that allows me to have a B&W image directly from the camera.   This feature still allows me to shoot in RAW mode but it provides to Nikon Studio NX a RAW file that has a bit set that makes the image B&W, but if you edit in Photoshop ACR v.16.1 than you can unset this bit and you can use the image as an original colour or B&W image.
So I am very pleased with everything about the Zf.
I have also decided that since I have the FTZ adapter for use on my Z7 I now have full use of the older F series of AFS lenses that I have as well as the older AF-D and MF lenses.  Phew no more expensive Nikon glass to buy.



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Mon Nov 27th, 2023 14:58
 
2nd Post
chrisbet



Joined: Thu Feb 7th, 2019
Location: Leigh On Sea, Essex , United Kingdom
Posts: 1526
Status: 
Offline
Lol - I thought we had lost you to Fuji - welcome back :thumbs:



____________________
If it is broken it was probably me ....
 




Posted: Mon Nov 27th, 2023 18:54
 
3rd Post
Graham Whistler



Joined: Fri Apr 13th, 2012
Location: Fareham, United Kingdom
Posts: 1939
Status: 
Offline
JK good to see you back!



____________________
Graham Whistler
 




Posted: Mon Nov 27th, 2023 22:15
 
4th Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6993
Status: 
Offline
I still have my Fuji kit and in many ways the Zf is more like a Fuji (XT5) than other Nikons.  What I do have is a situation where I can shoot MF (Fuji), FF (Nikon) and APS-C (Fuji) and no Nikon APS-C except my D500 which I have kept as it pairs so well with the Nikon 200-500 for birding.

I will use the Fuji XT5 with 10-24, 16-80 and 70-300 as my travel kit, the Nikon Zf and Z9 as my landscape cameras and the Fuji GFX100S kit for critical or large landscape work.



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Wed Nov 29th, 2023 13:57
 
5th Post
Iain



Joined: Thu Apr 5th, 2012
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Posts: 1490
Status: 
Offline
It sounds like you have everything covered now Jonathan.

 




Posted: Wed Nov 29th, 2023 23:22
 
6th Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4583
Status: 
Offline
Jonathan
I am intrigued with your choice of a the 40mp Fuji XT5 DX sensor versus a 24mp Nikon Zf FX sensor.

Intuitively one would question the propensity for high pixel density on smaller sensors to generate more noise. Is the Fuji better at reducing noise than Nikon?

We’ve always considered 24mp on FX to be the sweet spot. So what’s with the Fuji? I’ve heard good reports from another friend with this camera and just wondered how it appears to buck the pixel to noise trend.



____________________
Eric
 




Posted: Thu Nov 30th, 2023 13:06
 
7th Post
novicius



Joined: Sun Aug 12th, 2012
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 449
Status: 
Offline
Congrats with that swish Zf ,it makes for a lovely early Christmas present ...now, where was J K `s report about that Z9 again...



____________________
Back in Danmark

I do not use my equipment to make photo`s .. I take photo`s to use my equipment

The better I become at photography,the better my camera gets.
 




Posted: Thu Nov 30th, 2023 13:27
 
8th Post
Iain



Joined: Thu Apr 5th, 2012
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Posts: 1490
Status: 
Offline
Eric wrote:
Jonathan
I am intrigued with your choice of a the 40mp Fuji XT5 DX sensor versus a 24mp Nikon Zf FX sensor.

Intuitively one would question the propensity for high pixel density on smaller sensors to generate more noise. Is the Fuji better at reducing noise than Nikon?

We’ve always considered 24mp on FX to be the sweet spot. So what’s with the Fuji? I’ve heard good reports from another friend with this camera and just wondered how it appears to buck the pixel to noise trend.

I found when messing about with Fuji that the way the cameras process the image seems to keep detail in but takes noise out.

 




Posted: Fri Dec 1st, 2023 13:39
 
9th Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4583
Status: 
Offline
Iain wrote:
I found when messing about with Fuji that the way the cameras process the image seems to keep detail in but takes noise out.
That’s what a friend says he is finding and believes its to do with some sort of linear processing…but didn’t elaborate.
I don’t recall shooting at high iso with the fujis I had but as I am going through the archive sorting raws I will have a closer look at the fujis files.



____________________
Eric
 




Posted: Fri Dec 1st, 2023 14:23
 
10th Post
Iain



Joined: Thu Apr 5th, 2012
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Posts: 1490
Status: 
Offline
Eric wrote:
That’s what a friend says he is finding and believes its to do with some sort of linear processing…but didn’t elaborate.
I don’t recall shooting at high iso with the fujis I had but as I am going through the archive sorting raws I will have a closer look at the fujis files.

It will be interesting to see what you think Eric.

 

Reply
1st new
This is topic ID = 1984     Current time is 04:52 Page:    1  2  3  Next Page Last Page    
Nikon DSLR Forums > Camera and Lens Forums > Cameras > And so a Zf Top

Users viewing this topic

Post quick reply

Go to top
Go to end
Messages
Home
Recent topics
Unread posts
Last posts
Splash

Current theme is Modern editor



A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk Thank you.


Hosted by Octarine Services

UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0599 seconds (66% database + 34% PHP). 84 queries executed.