This site requires new users to accept that a small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk after requesting a new account. Thank you.

 Moderated by: chrisbet, Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2  3   
Z commotion   -   Page   3
Nikon shooting themselves in the Z foot ?  Rate Topic 
AuthorPost



Posted: Fri Jan 17th, 2020 03:42
 
21st Post
Iain



Joined: Thu Apr 5th, 2012
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Posts: 1490
Status: 
Offline
I noticed when I was watching a Gordon Buchanan program that when he needs to travel light he uses a Nikon for his videos.

 




Posted: Fri Jan 17th, 2020 08:28
 
22nd Post
Robert



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
I have read many disparaging comments about the Z bodies and lenses.  It's a very pleasant change to read this from Lens Rentals on a take apart (they call it a 'teardown',it's anything but that) of a Nikon 24-70 f/2.8 lens.



____________________
Robert.

 




Posted: Fri Jan 17th, 2020 09:43
 
23rd Post
chrishamer

 

Joined: Fri Apr 6th, 2012
Location:  
Posts: 61
Status: 
Offline
Robert wrote:
I have read many disparaging comments about the Z bodies and lenses.  It's a very pleasant change to read this from Lens Rentals on a take apart (they call it a 'teardown',it's anything but that) of a Nikon 24-70 f/2.8 lens.
I honestly don't get it to be honest, my two theories are that the high prices of the 1.8 lenses made everyone judge them without trying them and the second is that people ripping into the Z kit online just want to convince themselves they don't want them?

Other than the lack of 3D tracking and slightly worse night time AF I find it exactly the same in terms of ease of operation as the D600 and D800. In fact I've found a lot of it easier. 

Not surprised to see people happy with the video quality, I honestly think the 4K looks great. 

I found this article very interesting http://www.sansmirror.com/newsviews/2019-mirrorless-camera/july-september-2019-mirrorl/a-nikon-mirrorless-safari.html

 




Posted: Fri Jan 17th, 2020 10:22
 
24th Post
Robert



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
Yes, that was a very good article, thanks for posting the link.



____________________
Robert.

 




Posted: Fri Jan 17th, 2020 10:40
 
25th Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6993
Status: 
Offline
I have so many F mount lenses that I see little or no need to buy S mount lenses even though I am sure they are very desirable.  I have thd FTZ adapter which works very well on all my AFS lenses and if not then that qaint thing called manual focus can be done. ;-)

My other big issue is S mount wont fit, or focus to infinity, on F mount cameras.



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Fri Jan 17th, 2020 11:06
 
26th Post
chrishamer

 

Joined: Fri Apr 6th, 2012
Location:  
Posts: 61
Status: 
Offline
jk wrote:
I have so many F mount lenses that I see little or no need to buy S mount lenses even though I am sure they are very desirable.  I have thd FTZ adapter which works very well on all my AFS lenses and if not then that qaint thing called manual focus can be done. ;-)

My other big issue is S mount wont fit, or focus to infinity, on F mount cameras.

Absolutely, makes sense, if you have F mount glass - especially if it's high end the actual benefits would be negligible. Personally I never had that many lenses, the only ones I sold were a couple of AF-D ones as they were a bit pointless on the Z6.

I've found the 24-70 F4S great as a travel lens, and the 50mm 1.8S has proven pretty impressive too.

I'll get some more S lenses eventually, but I'm going to prioritise a 200-500 5.6 before getting the 14-30 F4S and maybe the 70-200 2.8S

 




Posted: Fri Jan 17th, 2020 11:19
 
27th Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6993
Status: 
Offline
The 200-500 is a great lens.  Works brilliantly on the D500 for birding but also on the D850.  However on D850 the high MP and long focal length leaves you compromising on shutter speed or high ISO.  I reckon the higher MPs force you up one or even two stops of shutter speed compared with 24MP.  On your Z6 it should work well.



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Sat Jan 18th, 2020 04:20
 
28th Post
Robert



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
What occurred to me when I first saw the Z specification was that there would be a plethora of adaptors made for almost any lens old and new.  That is happening, most possible combinations are now readily available and the list is growing, presenting the ability to place a very competent sensor behind almost any glass.  For some, perhaps many, that is irrelevant but for those who venture out of the box it's priceless.

To spite the inevitable naysayers, Nikon have I believe created a masterpiece which will evolve as the D series did.  I would love to see a take apart account of dismantling a Z camera, I suspect the innards are every bit as well made as the 24-70 f/2.8 lens.



____________________
Robert.

 




Posted: Sat Jan 18th, 2020 05:12
 
29th Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6993
Status: 
Offline
Yes the adapters are definitely coming.

I have a Nikon to FujiX adapter that has an element in it that allows the Fuji to have the same FOV as on my Nikon.  So my Sigma 150mm f2.8 macro behaves the same as on my Nikon.
I want a similar adapter but Hasselblad lens to Z mount.
Actually what I really want is my Hasselblad 2000FCW with 30mm f4, 80mm f2.8, and 150mm f4 back but with a full size 60x60mm (in reality 56x56mm) digital back.  I do not want to have to process film or prints again.



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Sat Jan 18th, 2020 13:53
 
30th Post
Robert



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
jk wrote:
Actually what I really want is my Hasselblad 2000FCW with 30mm f4, 80mm f2.8, and 150mm f4 back but with a full size 60x60mm (in reality 56x56mm) digital back.  I do not want to have to process film or prints again.
Yes indeed I would have thought it would be desirable on many fronts, this trend to ever smaller sensors somehow misses the point,  I desperately miss my Bronica S2a despite the reversed image.  I don't miss the film aspect.



____________________
Robert.

 

Reply
1st new
This is topic ID = 1765     Current time is 06:34 Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2  3     
Nikon DSLR Forums > Camera and Lens Forums > Cameras > Z commotion Top

Users viewing this topic

Post quick reply

Go to top
Go to end
Messages
Home
Recent topics
Unread posts
Last posts
Splash

Current theme is Modern editor



A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk Thank you.


Hosted by Octarine Services

UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0607 seconds (67% database + 33% PHP). 84 queries executed.