This site requires new users to accept that a small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk after requesting a new account. Thank you.

 Moderated by: chrisbet, Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next Page Last Page  
D600 oil and dust issues   -   Page   3
 Rate Topic 
AuthorPost



Posted: Tue Oct 3rd, 2017 10:05
 
21st Post
highlander



Joined: Tue Jul 24th, 2012
Location: Scotland, United Kingdom
Posts: 187
Status: 
Offline
Mine starts with 60



____________________
Blog https://blythestorm.com
Website http://www.blythestormphotography.com
 




Posted: Tue Oct 3rd, 2017 13:46
 
22nd Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4555
Status: 
Offline
Sorry...told you my memory was vague but my typing is even worse.

Muxed ip the 4 and 0..... 604000



____________________
Eric
 




Posted: Wed Oct 11th, 2017 13:47
 
23rd Post
highlander



Joined: Tue Jul 24th, 2012
Location: Scotland, United Kingdom
Posts: 187
Status: 
Offline
Now problems so far. Yes, I have had a speck or two of dust but I'd expect that in normal operation.



____________________
Blog https://blythestorm.com
Website http://www.blythestormphotography.com
 




Posted: Thu Nov 23rd, 2017 06:10
 
24th Post
highlander



Joined: Tue Jul 24th, 2012
Location: Scotland, United Kingdom
Posts: 187
Status: 
Offline
Having a bit of a moan. I bought the D600, I was told it wasn't affected by the dust/oil issue as it was a later one. It is, I have to clean it every time I use it, but I knew it was a risk I was taking on, as I said in this discussion thread.

Nikon UK have said that I can send it in and IF it turns out to be covered by the original warranty issue then they will clean it (big deal, I do that) or POSSIBLY replace the shutter, but only IF and POSSIBLY. They also want my camera for 4-6 weeks, they can't do it faster. I can't be without a camera for a month! I'm trying to earn a living here.

So, I'm stuck with spending a fortune on cleaning swabs whilst I save to replace it.



____________________
Blog https://blythestorm.com
Website http://www.blythestormphotography.com
 




Posted: Thu Nov 23rd, 2017 07:22
 
25th Post
highlander



Joined: Tue Jul 24th, 2012
Location: Scotland, United Kingdom
Posts: 187
Status: 
Offline
Don't know why I got a double post.

Latest offer from Nikon is minimum two week turnaround, could be up to four weeks.

And then they won't say it's covered or that they'll do more than clean it, which i can do myself.

Whatever, it's too long and if they charge me for a repair then it's probably not even worth doing. Guess I'll start saving for a D800 and hope I don't get one with the left focus point issue.

o.O



____________________
Blog https://blythestorm.com
Website http://www.blythestormphotography.com
 




Posted: Thu Nov 23rd, 2017 10:34
 
26th Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4555
Status: 
Offline
Oh dear, sorry about that Jan. I suppose the problem with rushing them, might be they decide a quick fix is all they can do. It's also one of the problems of putting all your eggs in one camera basket.

I was reading a very good logical and informed review of the D850 yesterday. The reviewer likened the 'bar raising' of the D850 to the launch of the D3....which I wholeheartedly agree, was monumentally groundbreaking at the time. But one person made the equally compelling arguement that a D810 plus a D500 didn't add up to the price of the D850, yet covered most of its functionality. The one thing he failed to point out, was that the two camera option was not only cheaper, but gave flexibility AND if one had to be repaired.....you still had the other to carry on using.



____________________
Eric
 




Posted: Thu Nov 23rd, 2017 11:18
 
27th Post
highlander



Joined: Tue Jul 24th, 2012
Location: Scotland, United Kingdom
Posts: 187
Status: 
Offline
Absolutely. When I was shooting weddings I had two bodies for that reason. Landscapes don't tend to require an immediate back up although of course it is still annoying to be without a camera. Up until now, whenever I have required a service or repair I have used authorised but non-Nikon owned companies and the turnaround has been usually 72 hours at most. Sadly, Nikon need 4 weeks minimum evidently to assess and possibly fix it. If it wasn't that it's the shutter and thats expensive, I would be inclined to get it done elsewhere and just pay for it. That isn't at the moment an option financially. Neither is buying a second body.



____________________
Blog https://blythestorm.com
Website http://www.blythestormphotography.com
 




Posted: Thu Nov 23rd, 2017 13:04
 
28th Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4555
Status: 
Offline
highlander wrote:
Absolutely. When I was shooting weddings I had two bodies for that reason. Landscapes don't tend to require an immediate back up although of course it is still annoying to be without a camera. Up until now, whenever I have required a service or repair I have used authorised but non-Nikon owned companies and the turnaround has been usually 72 hours at most. Sadly, Nikon need 4 weeks minimum evidently to assess and possibly fix it. If it wasn't that it's the shutter and thats expensive, I would be inclined to get it done elsewhere and just pay for it. That isn't at the moment an option financially. Neither is buying a second body.

I thought you bought this from Ffordes? Isn't there some comeback on them? Surely there's some comeback on the vendor whoever it was, after only a couple? of months???



____________________
Eric
 




Posted: Thu Nov 23rd, 2017 13:20
 
29th Post
highlander



Joined: Tue Jul 24th, 2012
Location: Scotland, United Kingdom
Posts: 187
Status: 
Offline
I will have to discuss it with them, although I imagine they will only offer to send it away in the same way that I can.



____________________
Blog https://blythestorm.com
Website http://www.blythestormphotography.com
 




Posted: Thu Nov 23rd, 2017 14:07
 
30th Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4555
Status: 
Offline
highlander wrote:
I will have to discuss it with them, although I imagine they will only offer to send it away in the same way that I can.

Err...no. If you bought something defective from a retailer you have a legal right to have fair reparation. Under 2015 consumer rights you have 30days to get full refund. After 30days.....

" You're entitled to a full or partial refund instead of a repair or replacement if any of the following are true:

1. the cost of the repair or replacement is disproportionate to the value of the goods or digital content
2. a repair or replacement is impossible
3. a repair or replacement would cause you significant inconvenience
4. the repair would take an unreasonably long amount of time."

See points 3 and 4!!


At the very least, they should be incentivised by this, to loan you a camera for the duration!!

Go bite their legs, girl!;-)



____________________
Eric
 

Reply
1st new
This is topic ID = 1462     Current time is 21:47 Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next Page Last Page    
Nikon DSLR Forums > Camera and Lens Forums > Cameras > D600 oil and dust issues Top

Users viewing this topic

Post quick reply

Go to top
Go to end
Messages
Home
Recent topics
Unread posts
Last posts
Splash

Current theme is Modern editor



A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk Thank you.


Hosted by Octarine Services

UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0552 seconds (62% database + 38% PHP). 82 queries executed.