This site requires new users to accept that a small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk after requesting a new account. Thank you.

 Moderated by: chrisbet, Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2  3  4  Next Page Last Page  
Very happy with my D500 and 200-500mm   -   Page   3
 Rate Topic 
AuthorPost



Posted: Tue Jul 5th, 2016 17:35
 
21st Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4583
Status: 
Offline
jk wrote:
On a monopod or tripod the D3 and 400mm f2.8 is fairly easy to use but if you are carrying two cameras one of which has the 400mm attached life becomes burdensome. Well I certainly feel like a beast of burden. The results are awesome though.

I was happy using a D3 with my 500mm on a tripod...it was lugging it about that irked me.



____________________
Eric
 




Posted: Wed Jul 6th, 2016 12:27
 
22nd Post
Robert



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
Eric wrote:
Robert wrote:
I parted with my Nikkor 400 f 3.5 and regret having done so, easy to part with, very hard to replace.

Weight is an advantage, large mass is less prone to vibrate/shake, another reason why I wanted the D3.


I must be a wimp. The heavier and bulkier the equipment, the less it encourages me to use it.

:thumbsdown:


:lol: When I was working for the building firm I worked for for many years, not many wanted to assist me with tasks I was engaged in because what ever it was, it was bound to be BIG and ****ing heavy! I haven't changed!!! When you add my surveyors tripod and my heavy duty pan/tilt head, the assembly can get a rather heavy. That was probably why I got vertigo having carried it for 9 miles one day at Donnington race track. At Rockingham I variously tried a Quad and trailer and my trusty push bike. Mind you even I drew the line at carrying my tripod on my pushbike...



____________________
Robert.

 




Posted: Thu Jul 7th, 2016 13:14
 
23rd Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4583
Status: 
Offline
Robert wrote:
Eric wrote:
Robert wrote:
I parted with my Nikkor 400 f 3.5 and regret having done so, easy to part with, very hard to replace.

Weight is an advantage, large mass is less prone to vibrate/shake, another reason why I wanted the D3.


I must be a wimp. The heavier and bulkier the equipment, the less it encourages me to use it.

:thumbsdown:


:lol: When I was working for the building firm I worked for for many years, not many wanted to assist me with tasks I was engaged in because what ever it was, it was bound to be BIG and ****ing heavy! I haven't changed!!! When you add my surveyors tripod and my heavy duty pan/tilt head, the assembly can get a rather heavy. That was probably why I got vertigo having carried it for 9 miles one day at Donnington race track. At Rockingham I variously tried a Quad and trailer and my trusty push bike. Mind you even I drew the line at carrying my tripod on my pushbike...


You rough tough Lancashire lads!
:bowing:



____________________
Eric
 




Posted: Thu Jul 7th, 2016 15:05
 
24th Post
Robert



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
:lol:

:sssshh: (Cumbria!). Although I was born in Lancashire... Brung up in the West Riding then emigrated back to Lancashire, until the boundaries commission decided I was actually in Cumbria...

Confused? So am I!!! :needsahug:



____________________
Robert.

 




Posted: Fri Jul 8th, 2016 03:14
 
25th Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6995
Status: 
Offline
Easier to just consider yourself a world person!



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Sat Jul 9th, 2016 23:11
 
26th Post
TomOC



Joined: Wed Apr 11th, 2012
Location: Sausalito, California USA
Posts: 616
Status: 
Offline
Robert wrote:
Tom, re. The Flash commander...

I remember the flash is now radio frequency controlled (RF) by the D500, it's mentioned in the tech specs. Can't find anything to confirm there is a compatible flashgun on the Nikon site but this is when they reap the confusion of calling IR flash control 'wireless' when almost every person on the planet regards wireless as RF. Sigh.

You may get some clues as you explore the manual and menus.

Good luck with the D500, it's a nice tool, for the price a gift.


Thanks, Robert. I still have to finish unboxing - been traveling and working on a project... teasing myself with the little beauty sitting on my desk at home :-)



____________________
Tom O'Connell

-Lots of people talk to animals.... Not very many listen, though.... That's the problem.

Benjamin Hoff, The Tao of Pooh
 




Posted: Sat Jul 9th, 2016 23:14
 
27th Post
TomOC



Joined: Wed Apr 11th, 2012
Location: Sausalito, California USA
Posts: 616
Status: 
Offline
Iain wrote:
May be good glass Robert but the weight of the 400 F2.8 would be enough to make me part with it. The 300, that would be a different story.

The weight is so much more severe once you get a bit used to carrying around a Fuji most of the time. That can really spoil you !



____________________
Tom O'Connell

-Lots of people talk to animals.... Not very many listen, though.... That's the problem.

Benjamin Hoff, The Tao of Pooh
 




Posted: Sat Jul 9th, 2016 23:15
 
28th Post
TomOC



Joined: Wed Apr 11th, 2012
Location: Sausalito, California USA
Posts: 616
Status: 
Offline
Eric wrote:
Robert wrote:
I parted with my Nikkor 400 f 3.5 and regret having done so, easy to part with, very hard to replace.

Weight is an advantage, large mass is less prone to vibrate/shake, another reason why I wanted the D3.


I must be a wimp. The heavier and bulkier the equipment, the less it encourages me to use it.

:thumbsdown:


+1



____________________
Tom O'Connell

-Lots of people talk to animals.... Not very many listen, though.... That's the problem.

Benjamin Hoff, The Tao of Pooh
 




Posted: Sun Jul 10th, 2016 04:31
 
29th Post
Robert



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
TomOC wrote:
Iain wrote:
May be good glass Robert but the weight of the 400 F2.8 would be enough to make me part with it. The 300, that would be a different story.

The weight is so much more severe once you get a bit used to carrying around a Fuji most of the time. That can really spoil you !


My 'brand loyalty' and the fact I am locked into one system prevents me from experimenting with alternatives. I am hard pressed to afford one set of gear, two sets would be completely out of reach.

At my last visit to car racing, one lad had what I think was a Sony... It was a tiny camera, the lad told me it was full frame, he uses it almost exclusively for video. He had a Pele? case full of very fast, top Canon lenses which he uses on the Sony via an adaptor. It appeared to be mirrorless, basically a sensor on the back of the lens.

In the building/construction trade lightweight gear is useless/rubbish. I have grown accustomed to working with heavy gear all my life and consider the D3 and a 2.8 Nikkor to be featherweight in comparison with a 90Lb rock drill leaping about trying to do it's own thing, or lifting a half ton beam in by hand on my own.

I accept it can get a bit heavy after walking 9 miles back and forth all day round a circuit but it keeps me fit, some people pay thousands of £ to lift weights in a gym, or ride a bike bolted to the floor, which I see as about as pointless as it gets.



____________________
Robert.

 




Posted: Sun Jul 10th, 2016 09:41
 
30th Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6995
Status: 
Offline
I just bought a Fuji X30 as it better than my Nikon as a pocket/walk around camera.
I do find that we need to always compromise with image quality, getting the shot and also not worrying overly on using the best or heavy gear all the time.
Sometimes just getting the shot is what is required.



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 

Reply
1st new
This is topic ID = 1339     Current time is 11:51 Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2  3  4  Next Page Last Page    
Nikon DSLR Forums > Camera and Lens Forums > Cameras > Very happy with my D500 and 200-500mm Top

Users viewing this topic

Post quick reply

Go to top
Go to end
Messages
Home
Recent topics
Unread posts
Last posts
Splash

Current theme is Modern editor



A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk Thank you.


Hosted by Octarine Services

UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0678 seconds (67% database + 33% PHP). 93 queries executed.