This site requires new users to accept that a small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk after requesting a new account. Thank you.

 Moderated by: chrisbet, Page:    1  2  3  4  Next Page Last Page  
Metadata   -   Page   1
 Rate Topic 
AuthorPost



Posted: Sat Nov 21st, 2015 09:39
 
1st Post
Iain



Joined: Thu Apr 5th, 2012
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Posts: 1478
Status: 
Offline
When looking at images taken with the D7200 and the D6100 in Adobe Bridge i get no metadata and I can't work out why.
It's bound to be something simple that I'm missing.

 




Posted: Sat Nov 21st, 2015 10:04
 
2nd Post
Robert



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
NEF or JPEG? Should make no difference...

I usually check EXIF in Photoshop or Lightroom, you get a fuller report (more data) from Photoshop. Have never used Bridge to check metadata, did not know it was possible.

The only time I have used Bridge was to open JPEG's in the RAW processor ADR? Which gives some finer controls over tones and white balance, together with it's batch processing features.



____________________
Robert.

 




Posted: Sat Nov 21st, 2015 10:08
 
3rd Post
Iain



Joined: Thu Apr 5th, 2012
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Posts: 1478
Status: 
Offline
Thats the funny thing Robert I can get the metadata in LR and PS so I would expect it to be in BR.

I use BR a bit but it's not a hardship to look at MD in LR.

 




Posted: Sat Nov 21st, 2015 11:30
 
4th Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6965
Status: 
Offline
I dont use Bridge but I do know it is meant to show metadata. Have you looked at the tabs and preferences.



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Sat Nov 21st, 2015 11:41
 
5th Post
Iain



Joined: Thu Apr 5th, 2012
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Posts: 1478
Status: 
Offline
Ive looked but can't see anything. I've turned the Mac off now but will have a look tomorrow.

 




Posted: Sat Nov 21st, 2015 16:00
 
6th Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6965
Status: 
Offline
Here you go.

Attachment: Screen Shot 2015-11-21 at 22.59.12.jpg (Downloaded 21 times)



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Sun Nov 22nd, 2015 07:53
 
7th Post
Iain



Joined: Thu Apr 5th, 2012
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Posts: 1478
Status: 
Offline
Got it working, it must have been in the settings as I reset them and it's there.

 




Posted: Sun Nov 22nd, 2015 09:26
 
8th Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4529
Status: 
Offline
So you went for the D610, Iain? I would be interested to get your perspective on how the D7200 compares to the D610.. regarding the buffer speed and general responsiveness.

Coming from the D3 to the D750 I do feel that the D3 was faster, slicker and did everything quicker. Of course it only has 12mp which meant smaller files to handle. It's this comparative 'sluggishness' that disappoints on the D750. Of course it may just be the difference between Dbodies and Dxx bodies.



____________________
Eric
 




Posted: Sun Nov 22nd, 2015 09:43
 
9th Post
Iain



Joined: Thu Apr 5th, 2012
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Posts: 1478
Status: 
Offline
So far I have found the D610 to be a bit slower than the D7200 in focus speed. The buffer, as yet I have not hit it on either, I have a 1000x Sd card in both which seems to keep me off the buffer.
I prefer the handling of th D7200 I don't know why as they are both of similar size and layout. The D610 is about a stop or so better at high ISO.
As for IQ surprisenley I can't see much difference.
It's still early days, I think more use of both is needed.

 




Posted: Sun Nov 22nd, 2015 11:39
 
10th Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6965
Status: 
Offline
Eric wrote:
So you went for the D610, Iain? I would be interested to get your perspective on how the D7200 compares to the D610.. regarding the buffer speed and general responsiveness.

Coming from the D3 to the D750 I do feel that the D3 was faster, slicker and did everything quicker. Of course it only has 12mp which meant smaller files to handle. It's this comparative 'sluggishness' that disappoints on the D750. Of course it may just be the difference between Dbodies and Dxx bodies.


Eric, can you comment further on this sluggishness of the D750.
I'm likely to get a D750 or D810 in the new year but I feel that the D810 is too many MP especially as I have a D800. The D750 has some nice improvements over my D600.



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 

Reply
1st new
This is topic ID = 1263     Current time is 10:18 Page:    1  2  3  4  Next Page Last Page    
Nikon DSLR Forums > Camera and Lens Forums > Cameras > Metadata Top

Users viewing this topic

Post quick reply

Go to top
Go to end
Messages
Home
Recent topics
Unread posts
Last posts
Splash

Current theme is Modern editor



A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk Thank you.


Hosted by Octarine Services

UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0710 seconds (66% database + 34% PHP). 81 queries executed.