Nikon DSLR forum

This site requires new users to accept that a small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk after requesting a new account. Thank you.

Moderated by: chrisbet,

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6

Quick question - Page 6

D610 or D800?

Rate Topic

Author	Post

Posted: Thu Nov 12th, 2015 08:10

51^st Post

Iain

Joined:	Thu Apr 5th, 2012
Location:	Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Posts:	1480
Status:	Offline

Eric wrote:
Robert wrote:
Eric wrote:
Iain wrote:
I'm getting better IQ from the D7200 Robert.

What even tripod mounted D810?

My guess hand held or maybe lightweight tripod/monopod?

Well it will be useful to have that confirmed.

I would have thought there could be little doubt that the D800 has better resolving power than most other Nikon bodies but the realisation of its potential depends so much more on optimal technique.

That being the case, it may not be the best choice for all but the purists.

It would in ideal conditions and on a sturdy tripod but using hand held or reacting quick to something the 36mp lets you down.

I'm talking hand held.

Posted: Thu Nov 12th, 2015 08:58

52^nd Post

Eric

Joined:	Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location:	United Kingdom
Posts:	4537
Status:	Offline

richw wrote:
Eric wrote:
jk wrote:
The next generation or technology leap of sensors are the organic sensors.
http://www.andrewgoodman.me/blog/photogrpahy/the-fujifilm-organic-sensor/

As you say the current technology is moving forward and the logic chips are devloped to keep up with these step advances.

I have two concerns ...if the human eye can only see 14stops, what's the point of 29stops? And who will care about this level of fidelity? Future photographers will merely use their phone for 'good enough' snaps.
o.O

It would open up the post processing potential incredibly, allowing detail tonal range to be compressed so that it can be seen. I imagine it would be very forgiving of incorrect exposures as well!

Incorrect exposures? What are they?
:lol:

____________________
Eric

Posted: Thu Nov 12th, 2015 13:57

53^rd Post

Robert

Joined:	Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location:	South Lakeland, UK
Posts:	4066
Status:	Offline

Eric wrote:

Incorrect exposures? What are they?
:lol:

Lets not go there... 8-)

____________________
Robert.

Posted: Thu Nov 12th, 2015 14:03

54^th Post

Robert

Joined:	Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location:	South Lakeland, UK
Posts:	4066
Status:	Offline

Iain wrote:

I'm talking hand held.

Thanks Iain. Seems real world photography benefits from bigger pixels rather than ultra high definition.

____________________
Robert.

Posted: Thu Nov 12th, 2015 14:15

55^th Post

Iain

Joined:	Thu Apr 5th, 2012
Location:	Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Posts:	1480
Status:	Offline

Me Robert, I like things with two legs or four legs but not three..

Posted: Thu Nov 12th, 2015 15:01

56^th Post

Robert

Joined:	Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location:	South Lakeland, UK
Posts:	4066
Status:	Offline

I thought that would be the case Iain!

Let us know what you decide, and lets see some pix...

____________________
Robert.

Posted: Fri Nov 13th, 2015 12:41

57^th Post

Eric

Joined:	Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location:	United Kingdom
Posts:	4537
Status:	Offline

Iain wrote:
Me Robert, I like things with two legs or four legs but not three..

Let alone with one.

:lol:

____________________
Eric

1st new

This is topic ID = 1250 Current time is 10:43	Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6
Nikon DSLR Forums > Camera and Lens Forums > Cameras > Quick question	Top
Users viewing this topic