This site requires new users to accept that a small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk after requesting a new account. Thank you.

 Moderated by: chrisbet, Page:    1  2  3  4  5  6  Next Page Last Page  
So what's the choice?   -   Page   1
 Rate Topic 
AuthorPost



Posted: Fri Feb 20th, 2015 16:42
 
1st Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4583
Status: 
Offline
I am about to offload my D3 and D7000 along with some duplicate or unused lenses. I want to replace them with one body. But not sure which one.

For the moment I have the Fuji system for walk around holiday use (although the jury is still out on this type of camera) so the primary use for the new body would be wildlife, sporting events, landscape and maybe some commercial work if it comes along this year.

I am leaning towards either the D750 or the D810, but without a direct real life comparison I am unsure which to choose.

Historically, bigger pixels have been better. So are the images from the D750 better than the D810? Does the D810 take the lead position when doing large prints or cropping harder? I sort of get the feeling that the more precise technique required to max the D810 potential might cancel the advantage.

Thoughts? discussion?



____________________
Eric
 




Posted: Fri Feb 20th, 2015 17:21
 
2nd Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6995
Status: 
Offline
There is also the D610 if you dont want the video twizzles of the D750 but I think I would go for the D750.
The D810 is a slightly improved D800 with some nice extras. But will you use the extra MP and features. For landscape the 36MP will give great detail so might be a winner. The Fuji is equivalent to a 20MP Nikon if it existed, in other words it is the equal IQ wise to a D4 (approximately from my tests). The Fuji is the equal of the D3 but not asgood as the D600.



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Sat Feb 21st, 2015 22:19
 
3rd Post
amazing50

 

Joined: Thu Apr 12th, 2012
Location: Kitchener, Ontario Canada
Posts: 571
Status: 
Offline
Of the current Nikon offerings my vote would be for the D750.
Preronally I'm wating for a while to see what happens now that Canon has jumped to 50mp and there are some interesting fullfrane mirrorless advances.



____________________
There is nothing worse than a sharp image of a fuzzy concept ;~) Mike Grace
 




Posted: Sun Feb 22nd, 2015 03:38
 
4th Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4583
Status: 
Offline
amazing50 wrote:
Of the current Nikon offerings my vote would be for the D750.
Preronally I'm wating for a while to see what happens now that Canon has jumped to 50mp and there are some interesting fullfrane mirrorless advances.


I am leaning towards the 750.

It's very strange....after not using any camera for a few weeks, I picked up the D7000 and Fuji XT in quick succession. I have to say that the D7000 felt better in the hand despite being heavier...and the Fuji electronic viewfinder under artificial light was scarily yellow and muddy. In contrast, the D7000 was like "coming home".

I have been pleased with the Fuji results but I do feel the size causes me to hold the camera in a less intuitive, less comfortable manner. If this is the way for all mirrorless models I am starting to think the DSLR feel is better for me.



____________________
Eric
 




Posted: Sun Feb 22nd, 2015 06:05
 
5th Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6995
Status: 
Offline
I think the D750 is a very good mix of functionality and with 24MP it provides ability to crop out and still have a good quality image.

Eric you can bring/send XT1 to me in Spain. I will use, or swap for my XE2.
:lol:



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Sun Feb 22nd, 2015 11:41
 
6th Post
amazing50

 

Joined: Thu Apr 12th, 2012
Location: Kitchener, Ontario Canada
Posts: 571
Status: 
Offline
Eric wrote:

I am leaning towards the 750. 

I have been pleased with the Fuji results but I do feel the size causes me to hold the camera in a less intuitive, less comfortable manner. If this is the way for all mirrorless models I am starting to think the DSLR feel is better for me.

I find the same thing with my kit. The smaller cameras just don't sit right in my hands.



____________________
There is nothing worse than a sharp image of a fuzzy concept ;~) Mike Grace
 




Posted: Sun Feb 22nd, 2015 13:32
 
7th Post
TomOC



Joined: Wed Apr 11th, 2012
Location: Sausalito, California USA
Posts: 616
Status: 
Offline
Eric-

As often the case, my opinion is the minority.

I would go with the 810. I believe that increasingly we will leave the heavy glass on the shelf...but when we want to use it, it will likely be in situations where we will want absolute max IQ and so far nothing beats the 800 series in that department.

As to the XT-1. I am not a huge fan...a mini DSLR is not what I want from Fuji (though it is great to have an lcd back that articulates). It just doesn't feel right.

What you REALLY want is an X-pro 2... Nothing feels as good in the hand as the XP1...it just isn't quite up to the tech advances in the x100 or XE2...but the xp2 will be.

D800 or D810 and Fuji x100T and XP2 rule !!!!!

I still use the x100 (now T) more than all other setups I own...it is just so great to have a camera that fits in your pocket. Doesn't even need a neckstrap (use wrist strap mostly). Shoots with 1/2000 sync with flash, has built in ND filters...etc etc. Yes, fixed lens means you need to think more and move about more but that's a good thing.

Tom



____________________
Tom O'Connell

-Lots of people talk to animals.... Not very many listen, though.... That's the problem.

Benjamin Hoff, The Tao of Pooh
 




Posted: Sun Feb 22nd, 2015 15:08
 
8th Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4583
Status: 
Offline
TomOC wrote:
Eric-

As often the case, my opinion is the minority.

I would go with the 810. I believe that increasingly we will leave the heavy glass on the shelf...but when we want to use it, it will likely be in situations where we will want absolute max IQ and so far nothing beats the 800 series in that department.

As to the XT-1. I am not a huge fan...a mini DSLR is not what I want from Fuji (though it is great to have an lcd back that articulates). It just doesn't feel right.

What you REALLY want is an X-pro 2... Nothing feels as good in the hand as the XP1...it just isn't quite up to the tech advances in the x100 or XE2...but the xp2 will be.

D800 or D810 and Fuji x100T and XP2 rule !!!!!

I still use the x100 (now T) more than all other setups I own...it is just so great to have a camera that fits in your pocket. Doesn't even need a neckstrap (use wrist strap mostly). Shoots with 1/2000 sync with flash, has built in ND filters...etc etc. Yes, fixed lens means you need to think more and move about more but that's a good thing.

Tom


Thanks Tom
As always, your reasoning is compelling. Need to feel an XP before I can comment on it as the ultimate Fuji alternative.



____________________
Eric
 




Posted: Sun Feb 22nd, 2015 16:11
 
9th Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6995
Status: 
Offline
I agree with Tom that the XPro1 has the best 'feel' but it is lacking some of the more advanced features found in the XE2 and XT1.

Maybe the XPro2 will be an XT1 in an XPro1 body but for me the only real problem with the Fujis is the AF performance and the EVF performance in low light with fast action.
The OVF is not something I use very much.



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Mon Feb 23rd, 2015 03:10
 
10th Post
amazing50

 

Joined: Thu Apr 12th, 2012
Location: Kitchener, Ontario Canada
Posts: 571
Status: 
Offline
As much as I like Optical View Finders, some of the better electronic ones have some interesting features.

Got to use a Sony a7S on the weekend and it's electronic viewfinder preformed well.

Was able to display a horizontal line and various info not available on an OVF.



____________________
There is nothing worse than a sharp image of a fuzzy concept ;~) Mike Grace
 

Reply
1st new
This is topic ID = 1164     Current time is 11:53 Page:    1  2  3  4  5  6  Next Page Last Page    
Nikon DSLR Forums > Camera and Lens Forums > Cameras > So what's the choice? Top

Users viewing this topic

Post quick reply

Go to top
Go to end
Messages
Home
Recent topics
Unread posts
Last posts
Splash

Current theme is Modern editor



A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk Thank you.


Hosted by Octarine Services

UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0642 seconds (67% database + 33% PHP). 84 queries executed.