| Moderated by: chrisbet, | Page:   1 2 3 4 5   |
|
|||||||
| I took the plunge and bought myself a... - Page 4 | |
| Rate Topic |
| Author | Post |
|---|
| Posted: Sat Jan 3rd, 2015 12:22 |
|
31st Post |
Judith
|
Yippee!!! 
|
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Sat Jan 3rd, 2015 12:23 |
|
32nd Post |
Judith
|
Yippee!!! (Pic taken with the iPad, hence the crappiness of it!) Attachment: image.jpg (Downloaded 39 times)
|
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Sat Jan 3rd, 2015 12:55 |
|
33rd Post |
jk
|
You going to love it. 😄
____________________ Still learning after all these years! https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Sat Jan 3rd, 2015 13:36 |
|
34th Post |
amazing50
|
True the D610 and the D810 require more care to avoid camera shake, but as I learned with the D610, it has realy good high ISO, compared to D2x etc. and so in most cases the problem is solved with higher shutter speeds. The old 1/focal length, as a minimum handheld for me is now 1/focal length x2. This would be 1/100 sec for a 50mm lens. Consider also that these cameras are quite large and with practice easy to hand hold at lower speeds especially with VR on, which should only be used at low shutter speeds or it causes shake. An small light ASP/C format 24mg pix will give as much or more shake than a D810 in similar circumstances.
____________________ There is nothing worse than a sharp image of a fuzzy concept ;~) Mike Grace |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Sat Jan 3rd, 2015 15:10 |
|
35th Post |
Eric
|
amazing50 wrote:True the D610 and the D810 require more care to avoid camera shake, but as I learned with the D610, it has realy good high ISO, compared to D2x etc. and so in most cases the problem is solved with higher shutter speeds. You are right. I followed the faster shutter speed option with the D2X but as you say, it's useable ISO ceiling limited success. The D3 was a godsend giving latitude in ISO and pixel size. It's true technology has moved on and what once was unacceptable pixel density is now quite usable. Maybe the D810 with its higher ISO and sensor developments is not a 'bridge too far'. But unless you are doing a lot of large scale printing or heavy cropping I wonder if it's a 'bridge unnecessarily far'? Those file sizes concern me. But as Judith points out more critical deleting could be the answer. Having not upgraded my Nikon gear for some time, 2015 is going to be exciting as I get rid of the old and .....make my mind up what new to get.
____________________ Eric |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Sat Jan 3rd, 2015 15:17 |
|
36th Post |
Eric
|
Judith wrote:Yippee!!! Nice cushions Judith. Shame that stuff in front blocked the shot.  These threads aren't good for the wallet...starting to get 'left out' syndrome.  Do you think they will take back the hall carpet I just bought?
____________________ Eric |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Sat Jan 3rd, 2015 19:38 |
|
37th Post |
Judith
|
Eric wrote:Judith wrote: Oh you really are behind the times these days Eric, when even little me is ahead of you in technology!!  . Go on, you know you want to....I've had a wee mini play in the pretty crappy light of the living room - only a teeny bit life in the battery out of the box. I'm well impressed. The camera is slightly lighter than the d200 and very similar in size and feel which is great. The 24-70 is a heavy beast but I think it's only 200g heavier than my 70-300. Will have to try both out for size and weight to compare. I took a few exciting (not) pics of the armchair opposite where I'm sitting. The d810, of course had no difficulty coping with the lighting conditions and took a perfectly lit, sharp photo. The d200 couldn't even take a photo, even when pushed to 1600 ISO. So, first impressions are a big smiley yayy!! :thumbsup: Also, when I was collecting it earlier in John Lewis, there was a specialist Nikon consultant at the camera counter so I had a wee chat with her. Turns out she is there 2 days a week to deal with customer enquiries (and sell, obviously) so if I have any doubts about which buttons to press, I've to drop in and see her. Good to know.
|
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Sun Jan 4th, 2015 02:49 |
|
38th Post |
jk
|
Judith, Now is the time to get your D200 looked at by Nikon. Take it to the lady in JL and get her to get it sorted.
____________________ Still learning after all these years! https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Sun Jan 4th, 2015 06:44 |
|
39th Post |
Judith
|
Yeah, but it would cost more than its worth for the repair!
|
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Sun Jan 4th, 2015 10:18 |
|
40th Post |
Iain
|
I'm with Eric, it's as mane that black and gold stuff spoiles the shot. At least you are sorted, I'm still wondering what way to go with my kit. All you need to do now is get out and take some pics.
|
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| This is topic ID = 1147 Current time is 10:44 | Page: 1 2 3 4 5 | |
| Nikon DSLR Forums > Camera and Lens Forums > Cameras > I took the plunge and bought myself a... | Top | |
Users viewing this topic |
||
Current theme is Modern editor
| A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk Thank you. |
Hosted by Octarine Services
UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0690 seconds (69% database + 31% PHP). 85 queries executed.
UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0690 seconds (69% database + 31% PHP). 85 queries executed.