This site requires new users to accept that a small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk after requesting a new account. Thank you.

 Moderated by: chrisbet, Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2  3  4  Next Page Last Page  
Why is camera equipment so heavy...   -   Page   3
 Rate Topic 
AuthorPost



Posted: Sun Aug 21st, 2016 04:48
 
21st Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6986
Status: 
Offline
Robert wrote: Eric wrote:
I think we are all saying the same thing. The occasion should dictate the equipment you take, but you need to have thought through the potential eventualities first....which is the hard part and where the 'just in case' selections start the problem.

Nothing worse than being 400 miles from some small item that would have made the difference. Like a neutral density filter... Grrr.

o.O


I agree but the problem is when you have many 'just in case' items.
Then there is the IR and/or normal light issues!
:banghead:




____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Sun Aug 21st, 2016 12:52
 
22nd Post
highlander



Joined: Tue Jul 24th, 2012
Location: Scotland, United Kingdom
Posts: 187
Status: 
Offline
Have decided part of the culprit is my macbook, although its only an Air and therefore lighter, its still not that light. Shame I have to carry it for work, but then I don't have to carry a camera, I just like doing so



____________________
Blog https://blythestorm.com
Website http://www.blythestormphotography.com
 




Posted: Sun Aug 21st, 2016 13:47
 
23rd Post
Robert



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
highlander wrote:
Have decided part of the culprit is my macbook, although its only an Air and therefore lighter, its still not that light. Shame I have to carry it for work, but then I don't have to carry a camera, I just like doing so

Ahh! Apple to blame again! o.O

Have you considered an iPad or iPad Pro? Pretty much same functionality/power but more compact and lighter.



____________________
Robert.

 




Posted: Sun Aug 21st, 2016 17:18
 
24th Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4571
Status: 
Offline
jk wrote:
Robert wrote: Eric wrote:
I think we are all saying the same thing. The occasion should dictate the equipment you take, but you need to have thought through the potential eventualities first....which is the hard part and where the 'just in case' selections start the problem.

Nothing worse than being 400 miles from some small item that would have made the difference. Like a neutral density filter... Grrr.

o.O


I agree but the problem is when you have many 'just in case' items.
Then there is the IR and/or normal light issues!
:banghead:




In truth it was the addition of IR camera and dedicated lenses, that prompted my search for lighter equipment.

Of course, it's an easy decision to leave IR equipment in the car or back at home, if the weather is overcast.



____________________
Eric
 




Posted: Sun Aug 21st, 2016 17:35
 
25th Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4571
Status: 
Offline
Robert wrote:
highlander wrote:
Have decided part of the culprit is my macbook, although its only an Air and therefore lighter, its still not that light. Shame I have to carry it for work, but then I don't have to carry a camera, I just like doing so

Ahh! Apple to blame again! o.O

Have you considered an iPad or iPad Pro? Pretty much same functionality/power but more compact and lighter.


...and it has an integral camera! ;-)



____________________
Eric
 




Posted: Sun Aug 21st, 2016 17:58
 
26th Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6986
Status: 
Offline
highlander wrote:
Have decided part of the culprit is my macbook, although its only an Air and therefore lighter, its still not that light. Shame I have to carry it for work, but then I don't have to carry a camera, I just like doing so

You had an X100. That is very capable. ;-)
If you still have it use it or send to me! Money sent by PayPal. My X100 has died after 4-5 years use. Not heavy use but it has a screw loose inside (literally!) and is not right. It is probably repairable but is it economic to do so?
I have decided that Fuji stuff is lighter built than Nikon so doesnt last as long but is just as good unless you need/want fast AF.
For landscape who cares the Fuji wins, for wildlife or sport leave the Fuji at home and take the Nikon!



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Mon Aug 22nd, 2016 14:25
 
27th Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4571
Status: 
Offline
jk wrote:
highlander wrote:
Have decided part of the culprit is my macbook, although its only an Air and therefore lighter, its still not that light. Shame I have to carry it for work, but then I don't have to carry a camera, I just like doing so

You had an X100. That is very capable. ;-)
If you still have it use it or send to me! Money sent by PayPal. My X100 has died after 4-5 years use. Not heavy use but it has a screw loose inside (literally!) and is not right. It is probably repairable but is it economic to do so?
I have decided that Fuji stuff is lighter built than Nikon so doesnt last as long but is just as good unless you need/want fast AF.
For landscape who cares the Fuji wins, for wildlife or sport leave the Fuji at home and take the Nikon!


Will let you know in a few weeks. I have decided to take ONLY Fuji equipment on my next European adventure. Wildlife will hopefully figure in it ...so I will see if the Fuji copes. If it doesn't, there will be a grand Fuji sale in time for Christmas.

I just don't see the point of keeping one system for one category ( eg landscape = Fuji) Nikon bodies are not that much heavier than Fuji and could equally be used for landscape as wildlife as sports.

Time to make a decision...watch this space.
;-)



____________________
Eric
 




Posted: Tue Sep 6th, 2016 10:59
 
28th Post
highlander



Joined: Tue Jul 24th, 2012
Location: Scotland, United Kingdom
Posts: 187
Status: 
Offline
I shall be excited to see the outcome of this, and will have my cheque book ready just in case ;-)

My X100 sadly bit the dust, well actually water...lots of water...

I sold my XPro1 and regretted it.

Just (at the weekend) bought a Fuji XT1, 35mm, and 14mm. I think that will cover most of my needs and anything outside of that (wildlife) then I will use my Canon compact with its 45x optical zoom. OK, its not saleable quality but I don't intend selling those image. I rarely print them bigger than A4 (or actually 10x8 because I am old fashioned).

My XT1 kit takes up 1/3rd of the room and weighs 1/3rd of the weight of my Nikon kit. Given this is a Nikon forum, it is quite funny how many of us seem to be heading in the Fuji direction, even if only part time...

:devil:



____________________
Blog https://blythestorm.com
Website http://www.blythestormphotography.com
 




Posted: Wed Sep 7th, 2016 08:24
 
29th Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6986
Status: 
Offline
I am waiting for Eric's holiday report and see how he got on with his Fujis only.
I am sure he will return with some great images. The camera is not a limitation unless you do some niche photography like I do or sports stuff.
I think wildlife, except BIF, can now be done with the new Fuji 100-400 zoom.



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Mon Sep 12th, 2016 12:08
 
30th Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4571
Status: 
Offline
It's 35 deg here and ALL the wildlife is under cover...so nothing to report except... I HATE Fuji battery life.

I don't know how you guys live with these temperatures? Spent most of the afternoon in the pool.

Ironically I have taken more IR shots on the XE1 and films on the XT.

A simple observation about Fuji XT poor? response time. I have to keep switching it OFF to save battery life. This may well contribute to the perception that it's response is poor ...well it would wouldn't it. Lol ....nevertheless it's an example of how bridge cameras and electronic viewfinder bodies eat into battery life to the detriment of the overall experience.

No wildfire tomorrow either....of down a cave to keep cool.



____________________
Eric
 

Reply
1st new
This is topic ID = 1367     Current time is 17:47 Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2  3  4  Next Page Last Page    
Nikon DSLR Forums > Totally Off Topic Stuff > Everything Else > Why is camera equipment so heavy... Top

Users viewing this topic

Post quick reply

Go to top
Go to end
Messages
Home
Recent topics
Unread posts
Last posts
Splash

Current theme is Modern editor



A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk Thank you.


Hosted by Octarine Services

UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0685 seconds (68% database + 32% PHP). 91 queries executed.