This site requires new users to accept that a small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk after requesting a new account. Thank you.

 Moderated by: chrisbet, Page:    1  2  Next Page Last Page  
New iMac   -   Page   1
 Rate Topic 
AuthorPost



Posted: Sun Oct 26th, 2014 23:17
 
1st Post
richw



Joined: Tue Apr 10th, 2012
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 525
Status: 
Offline
Has anybody had a look at one of these yet. It looks like I should be able to display an entire D3 image at 100% on screen. Makes a very strong argument for one of these instead of a Mac Pro.

 




Posted: Sun Oct 26th, 2014 23:39
 
2nd Post
amazing50

 

Joined: Thu Apr 12th, 2012
Location: Kitchener, Ontario Canada
Posts: 571
Status: 
Offline
Is there a link to "one of these"?



____________________
There is nothing worse than a sharp image of a fuzzy concept ;~) Mike Grace
 




Posted: Mon Oct 27th, 2014 00:43
 
3rd Post
richw



Joined: Tue Apr 10th, 2012
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 525
Status: 
Offline
http://www.apple.com/imac-with-retina/

 




Posted: Mon Oct 27th, 2014 06:40
 
4th Post
Robert



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
Hi Rich, I think there are arguments for and against ultra high definition screens.

The usual viewing distance from a screen tends to be around 600 to 700mm. At that distance I can't 'see' the detail that the extra definition provides, except the image looks crisper. I did take a look at these in the Apple store recently. My retina iPad which is viewed from much closer, say around 400mm seems pretty crisp.

What I am asking myself is when do I NEED to see that detail during processing?

The only time I really need to get down to pixel level editing is when I am cutting through layers to reveal other layers beneath, for example with the 'Oakdale' IR image which has about six layers. When I erased the top layer to reveal underlying layers around the rigging of the boat I did have to zoom in close, right down to maybe 400% or closer to keep the edit clean, other than that I don't think ultra high definition helps but even then I would have to blow it up even more just to see the image pixels.

Other than that I like to see the entire image at a reasonable size and assess the effect of any adjustments I am making across the entire image. Whether seeing the individual pixels at 1:1 helps that I don't know, I guess it can't do any harm, it's probably good when sharpening. I tend to sit right back when making adjustments so I see the entire image rather than focusing on the detail.

The ultra high def certainly produces a crisper image but for close in pixel level editing I don't see it as a solution, I would still need to zoom in to very high levels of magnification.

Other than that the iMac is a very capable machine for image editing, especially with a decent amount of RAM and a Fusion Drive.

I feel far more important is to have a second (cheap, smaller and low res) monitor for the tool pallets and other 'clutter' which otherwise obscures the image, no matter how large the main screen may be. This is a breeze with an iMac, a £25 adaptor and an old PC monitor does the job perfectly. Most households have old unwanted 17" screens lying about, they can get a new lease of life and become an inseparable companion for the main screen.



____________________
Robert.

 




Posted: Mon Oct 27th, 2014 06:40
 
5th Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6987
Status: 
Offline
Yes very nice piece of kit.
I try to resist the iMac as although they are beautiful and very powerful I like the facility of multiple ports and disk expanability but this need is largely satisfied via my Drobo 8 drive unit which support a RAID Array of 32TB. Enough for my lifetime of photos and more!

The screen must be awesome as it surpasses my Dell 2711UW which give 2556x1600.
Maybe for my next machine in 2016.



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Mon Oct 27th, 2014 06:50
 
6th Post
Robert



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
The iMac has expansion capability in spades, four USB 3 sockets and two Thunderbolt plus Gig Ethernet RJ45.

Speed and huge capacity easily available, Thunderbolt drive are starting to become more affordable.



____________________
Robert.

 




Posted: Mon Oct 27th, 2014 07:09
 
7th Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6987
Status: 
Offline
Got to say I like to have my screen and computer hardware separate so I can upgrade as I think fit but I can understand the beauty of the all-in-one.



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Mon Oct 27th, 2014 08:56
 
8th Post
Ed Hutchinson



Joined: Wed Apr 4th, 2012
Location: Washington USA
Posts: 214
Status: 
Offline
I really, really like my iMac it does everything very well and with much less clutter (jumble of wires and cables for a PC) and being able to use more than one monitor I added 16 gigs of ram to it (total is 20) and I have seen it use up to 15 when editing.
The only issue has been OS related


Ed



____________________
R.O.C.E.D. retired old cranky extremely dangerous!

 




Posted: Mon Oct 27th, 2014 09:48
 
9th Post
Robert



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
In a domestic environment the iMac is a real winner, aesthetically pleasing yet very functional.

That said JK does have a very good point about being able to replace the processor and retain the screens and storage components. For that reason I prefer the Mac mini, I have had three Mac mini computers two which I have handed down to the children while retaining my hard drives and screens.

This is my setup:

Attachment: Screen Shot 2014-10-27 at 14.45.24.jpg (Downloaded 37 times)



____________________
Robert.

 




Posted: Mon Oct 27th, 2014 13:22
 
10th Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6987
Status: 
Offline
:lol: Robert I think I should have bought some Apple shares before I had that discussion with you about the Mac Mini.



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 

Reply
1st new
This is topic ID = 1121     Current time is 19:48 Page:    1  2  Next Page Last Page    
Nikon DSLR Forums > Totally Off Topic Stuff > Everything Else > New iMac Top

Users viewing this topic

Post quick reply

Go to top
Go to end
Messages
Home
Recent topics
Unread posts
Last posts
Splash

Current theme is Modern editor



A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk Thank you.


Hosted by Octarine Services

UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0577 seconds (64% database + 36% PHP). 80 queries executed.