This site requires new users to accept that a small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk after requesting a new account. Thank you.

 Moderated by: chrisbet, Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next Page Last Page  
Fake IR   -   Page   6
 Rate Topic 
AuthorPost



Posted: Mon Apr 29th, 2013 10:15
 
51st Post
Judith



Joined: Fri Apr 13th, 2012
Location: Scotland, United Kingdom
Posts: 325
Status: 
Offline
Oops, didn't notice there were another two pages of posts - I am behind the times!!

Bloody hell, Robert, I had to put my sunglasses on to look at that psychadelic number! :-O

Eric, rabbit on as much as you like - all very interesting. :-)

 




Posted: Mon Apr 29th, 2013 12:11
 
52nd Post
TomOC



Joined: Wed Apr 11th, 2012
Location: Sausalito, California USA
Posts: 616
Status: 
Offline
Judith-

It's not that they think you worked for an hour to make a cool image, they think you have some secret sauce app that makes all the improvements with a single click - and they don't know where to buy the app!!!



____________________
Tom O'Connell

-Lots of people talk to animals.... Not very many listen, though.... That's the problem.

Benjamin Hoff, The Tao of Pooh
 




Posted: Mon Apr 29th, 2013 12:13
 
53rd Post
Judith



Joined: Fri Apr 13th, 2012
Location: Scotland, United Kingdom
Posts: 325
Status: 
Offline
I think people really do think that photoshop is some kind of magic app. As you say, one click et voila!! Sigh...

 




Posted: Mon Apr 29th, 2013 12:28
 
54th Post
TomOC



Joined: Wed Apr 11th, 2012
Location: Sausalito, California USA
Posts: 616
Status: 
Offline
Well, it IS magic... But I haven't found the "viola" command yet...



____________________
Tom O'Connell

-Lots of people talk to animals.... Not very many listen, though.... That's the problem.

Benjamin Hoff, The Tao of Pooh
 




Posted: Mon Apr 29th, 2013 12:47
 
55th Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6967
Status: 
Offline
:lol:
I have a whole box of secret sauce apps but unfortunately you need to make sure that the genie doesnt get out of the bottle too often?

Like everything I think everyone has their own opinion of how much is right or wrong but ultimately it is a personal choice. If you dont like it then dont use it.

I will say that since cameras dont have a curves app built in then using Photoshop or some other similar application is a must if you want to have a particular tonal range other than a straight line flat (monotonous) tone!



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Mon Apr 29th, 2013 13:12
 
56th Post
Robert



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
Didn't the Old Masters paint with a variety of home made pigments, oils and toners to get the exact shades they wanted, what's the difference?



____________________
Robert.

 




Posted: Mon Apr 29th, 2013 13:39
 
57th Post
TomOC



Joined: Wed Apr 11th, 2012
Location: Sausalito, California USA
Posts: 616
Status: 
Offline
Robert wrote:
Didn't the Old Masters paint with a variety of home made pigments, oils and toners to get the exact shades they wanted, what's the difference?


REALLY??? You mean that Rembrandt CHEATED???



____________________
Tom O'Connell

-Lots of people talk to animals.... Not very many listen, though.... That's the problem.

Benjamin Hoff, The Tao of Pooh
 




Posted: Mon Apr 29th, 2013 13:47
 
58th Post
Robert



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
Well didn't Ansel Adams use a tripod? I'm told that's cheating...

Where do we stop?

Studio lights? Reflectors? Flash? Filters?

I think the only true was it to BE THERE! LOL :devil:



____________________
Robert.

 




Posted: Tue Apr 30th, 2013 05:36
 
59th Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4530
Status: 
Offline
Robert wrote: Well didn't Ansel Adams use a tripod? I'm told that's cheating...

Where do we stop?

Studio lights? Reflectors? Flash? Filters?

I think the only true was it to BE THERE! LOL :devil:

Its a valid question...at what point does 'manipulation' of the scene start.

(Not sure even the most devout purist would condem a tripod as the devil's spawn.:rofl:)

But using fill in flash/reflectors.... adjusting exposure selectively in the darkroom .....doing the same in photoshop, to me are all the same.

Its just optimising the tonal range of the image to better reflect what the eye sees as opposed to what the limitations of the film/senor capture.



Taking this argument further...

What is the difference between selective cropping in the darkroom (we have all done it to better frame the subject and exclude distacting background detail we missed when shooting!) and cloning/airbrushing distracting detail from a photo?


Personally I draw the line here.....
After this there are all manner of manipulative 'degrees' but they are all fake 'photos'.  Nothing wrong with that ...its artistic license.

Its ok to change colours and add items not in the original scene for specific reasons but these cannot be regarded 'as seen'...just like most paintings!

I include IR shots in this category.

Whether done in camera or in photoshop they are distortions of the observed scene. Just as adding ANY filter on the front of the camera (with the possible exception of polarisers, NDs and haze filters???) is a distortion of the real scene.

To this end I have always drawn (at least) a descriptive distinction between photos and images. Maybe semantics, but we capture photos ...and create images.

my 2 cents.
















____________________
Eric
 




Posted: Tue Apr 30th, 2013 07:29
 
60th Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6967
Status: 
Offline
I think that there is also another a point for consideration.

This is where a photo is changed or has elements added (like your table and chairs in dappled shade) to show a potential result of buying the product. I think this is acceptable use of Photoshop.

However the unacceptable side is where news or other journalistic images are deliberately changed in order to mislead the viewer to either make the photo more shocking or saleable. However the end game is deception.

We also need to be aware that some people are more easily deceived than others!



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 

Reply
1st new
This is topic ID = 605     Current time is 21:31 Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next Page Last Page    
Nikon DSLR Forums > The Image Processing and Editing Forums > Special Effects > Fake IR Top

Users viewing this topic

Post quick reply

Go to top
Go to end
Messages
Home
Recent topics
Unread posts
Last posts
Splash

Current theme is Modern editor



A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk Thank you.


Hosted by Octarine Services

UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0672 seconds (69% database + 31% PHP). 82 queries executed.