This site requires new users to accept that a small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk after requesting a new account. Thank you. |
Moderated by: chrisbet, | Page: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Is it a D400 or is it something else?   -   Page   2 | |
Rating: ![]() |
Author | Post |
---|
Posted: Fri Oct 25th, 2013 13:11 |
|
11th Post |
Robert![]() ![]()
![]() |
Look forward to the announcement it sounds like the sort of camera I would like, although I expect it will beyond my budget. My dream is a simple good quality body taking Nikkor F lenses with a standard 24 X 36 mm sensor (FX). I just want to take photographs, not engage in a technical battle with the tools. The current trend with the DSLR's of today seems to be to packing ever more 'features' into the menues. From that point of view I mourn the passing of film, what I love is the flexibility and immediacy of digital and the opportunity it presents for storage, processing and sharing. A good simple body would be great!
____________________ Robert. |
||||||||
|
Posted: Fri Oct 25th, 2013 14:51 |
|
12th Post |
Eric![]() ![]()
![]() |
Robert wrote:Look forward to the announcement it sounds like the sort of camera I would like, although I expect it will beyond my budget. I agree........but we may have to settle for a camera. ![]() Seriously....you are right. When I had the EOS1 (film) I also bought the 620 EF-M and the RT. The latter had a pellicle mirror, a 45deg fixed mirror, that enabled you to see the subject during exposure...and of course it was quiet and instant, with no mirror movement. I am surprised the modern EVF cameras didn't adapt this idea....it's only drawback was reduced viewfinder illumination and slight under exposure ....due to exposure being through the pellicle mirror. But the EFM was M for manual. The whole camera was a stripped down eos model requiring the user to take control without all the auto this and that. I had great fun with both models. But in truth, sometimes the extra ATD that the M model required DID prevent getting some shots. Maybe it's my style of photography, or laziness, but I tended to use the body that gave me Av exposure. It just took something out of the equation. Similarly, I find with the Fuji ( which I think you would enjoy using by the way) I still let the electronics nail down Av ....despite having full manual readily available.
____________________ Eric |
||||||||
|
Posted: Fri Oct 25th, 2013 18:39 |
|
13th Post |
Judith![]() ![]()
![]() |
Pfft!!! I saw the subject heading and got excited for a milisecond. Sigh... I'll be moving to Canon at this rate. I want a D400!! ![]()
|
||||||||
|
Posted: Sat Oct 26th, 2013 01:39 |
|
14th Post |
Robert![]() ![]()
![]() |
My understanding is Canon don't have a D400 (equivalent) either Judith. ![]()
____________________ Robert. |
||||||||
|
Posted: Sat Oct 26th, 2013 03:58 |
|
15th Post |
Eric![]() ![]()
![]() |
I blame Ray for the lack of a D400. Not only has he stopped posting but I suspect stopped buying cameras. He was always the benchmark for Nikon. They waited for him to buy before launching new models. Nikon are now without a reference point. Heyho! ![]()
____________________ Eric |
||||||||
|
Posted: Sat Oct 26th, 2013 14:11 |
|
16th Post |
Judith![]() ![]()
![]() |
So, all we need to do is get Ray to buy a D300s?!! Rayyyyyy.... ![]() Is he OK? Anyone heard from him?
|
||||||||
|
Posted: Sat Oct 26th, 2013 14:14 |
|
17th Post |
Eric![]() ![]()
![]() |
Judith wrote:So, all we need to do is get Ray to buy a D300s?!! Rayyyyyy.... Prices of the D300S are so good now it's not a daft idea to consider one. I think Ray has moved over to his other love... Radio.
____________________ Eric |
||||||||
|
Posted: Sat Oct 26th, 2013 15:08 |
|
18th Post |
Robert![]() ![]()
![]() |
Judith wrote:So, all we need to do is get Ray to buy a D300s?!! Rayyyyyy.... Ray is fine, I had an exchange of eMails last week with him, he has been busy with 'Honey do' jobs as he put it! He has been enjoying his motorbikes and HAM radio but he is having some problems with his truck.
____________________ Robert. |
||||||||
|
Posted: Sun Oct 27th, 2013 11:25 |
|
19th Post |
Iain![]() ![]()
![]() |
Robert wrote:My understanding is Canon don't have a D400 (equivalent) either Judith. Your right Robert, the Canon crowd are waiting for a 7dmk2. As I've said else where I think Canon and Nikon are waiting for each other to make a move.
|
||||||||
|
Posted: Sun Oct 27th, 2013 12:38 |
|
20th Post |
Eric![]() ![]()
![]() |
Iain wrote:Robert wrote: ....or Ray to buy something. ![]()
____________________ Eric |
||||||||
|
This is topic ID = 741 Current time is 05:37 | Page: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Nikon DSLR Forums > Camera and Lens Forums > Speculation about and wish list of new Nikon gear > Is it a D400 or is it something else? | Top | |
Users viewing this topic |
Current theme is Modern editor
A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk Thank you. |