This site requires new users to accept that a small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk after requesting a new account. Thank you. |
Moderated by: chrisbet, | Page: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Comments Please continued   -   Page   2 | |
Rate Topic |
Author | Post |
---|
Posted: Fri Jan 4th, 2013 09:24 |
|
11th Post |
Squarerigger![]() ![]()
![]() |
Alright I found another way of getting rid of the bag in the widow. Aperture has a clone feature and I just used the shadow next to the bag and cloned that over the bag and voila no more bag. The burn feature won't go dark enough but the clone works well. Gosh I wish I could do that in real life - just clone away what one does not like. It's good to learn a new trick. Still working. Great tips Eric and gives me some "home work" to do.
____________________ -------------------------------------------- Gary |
||||||||
|
Posted: Fri Jan 4th, 2013 09:26 |
|
12th Post |
Eric![]() ![]()
![]() |
Squarerigger wrote: Eric wrote:If you want to get reeealy scarey...you can tilt him. His eyes are looking up slighting in the original so tilting him to look more horizontal (not down!) can be a bit more sexy. You need to mask his outline and cut him out. Not straight forward to get a realistic result. will have a quick go (no work today!!!!!) and post again. OK here are a couple of examples how, once you have cut out the subject, you can change the effect....eg changing perspective and desaturating/defocusing/darkening the background. Attachment: cutout3.jpg (Downloaded 34 times)
____________________ Eric |
||||||||
|
Posted: Fri Jan 4th, 2013 10:16 |
|
13th Post |
Squarerigger![]() ![]()
![]() |
Eric wrote: Squarerigger wrote:Eric wrote:If you want to get reeealy scarey...you can tilt him. His eyes are looking up slighting in the original so tilting him to look more horizontal (not down!) can be a bit more sexy. Nice. How about I just send my photos to you on my SD card and you "handle" them, then return to me. Don't slap your copy write on them. ![]() I have shown my wife what you accomplished and she was not complementary on my efforts. Said something about me getting a new hobby. The nerve. ![]() Now back to work for me.
____________________ -------------------------------------------- Gary |
||||||||
|
Posted: Fri Jan 4th, 2013 10:19 |
|
14th Post |
Eric![]() ![]()
![]() |
Squarerigger wrote: Eric wrote:Squarerigger wrote:Eric wrote:If you want to get reeealy scarey...you can tilt him. His eyes are looking up slighting in the original so tilting him to look more horizontal (not down!) can be a bit more sexy. Tell her she needs to buy you photoshop for your next birthday...or sooner!!!! ![]() I have a nice shark hat you can give her!
____________________ Eric |
||||||||
|
Posted: Fri Jan 4th, 2013 10:54 |
|
15th Post |
jk![]() ![]()
![]() |
Squarerigger wrote: Eric wrote:Squarerigger wrote:Eric wrote:If you want to get reeealy scarey...you can tilt him. His eyes are looking up slighting in the original so tilting him to look more horizontal (not down!) can be a bit more sexy. Well you need to go a long way to get a better tutor or photo editor than Eric. What he can do in a few minutes takes other much longer so dont be disheartened.
____________________ Still learning after all these years! https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none |
||||||||
|
Posted: Fri Jan 4th, 2013 11:01 |
|
16th Post |
Squarerigger![]() ![]()
![]() |
Eric wrote: Squarerigger wrote:Eric wrote:Squarerigger wrote:Eric wrote:If you want to get reeealy scarey...you can tilt him. His eyes are looking up slighting in the original so tilting him to look more horizontal (not down!) can be a bit more sexy. I have done some preliminary research on photoshop. Very expensive! However, it can be used as an external editor to Aperture and seems most Aperture users in fact do this. Did I mention it is very expensive? My wife does not wear hats and I am sure your wife would hate to part with such a fashion statement. ![]()
____________________ -------------------------------------------- Gary |
||||||||
|
Posted: Fri Jan 4th, 2013 11:03 |
|
17th Post |
Squarerigger![]() ![]()
![]() |
jk wrote: Squarerigger wrote:Eric wrote:Squarerigger wrote:Eric wrote:If you want to get reeealy scarey...you can tilt him. His eyes are looking up slighting in the original so tilting him to look more horizontal (not down!) can be a bit more sexy. You are so right JK. There is so much to learn.
____________________ -------------------------------------------- Gary |
||||||||
|
Posted: Fri Jan 4th, 2013 11:07 |
|
18th Post |
jk![]() ![]()
![]() |
Like the B&W version especially after Eric's edits.
____________________ Still learning after all these years! https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none |
||||||||
|
Posted: Fri Jan 4th, 2013 11:15 |
|
19th Post |
Eric![]() ![]()
![]() |
Squarerigger wrot
Sounds as though you have Yorkshire ancestry. ![]() I DID say get the wife to buy it for you. Lightroom may be a good move.:thumbsup: Most of these packages will do what you want. You just have to define precisely what you are trying to achieve and seek out which tool/technique will do it for you. When I think of the hours/days/weeks/months/years I spent in the darkroom 'pickling my parts'.... then a good software package in a light/bright room wins every time.
____________________ Eric |
||||||||
|
Posted: Fri Jan 4th, 2013 12:09 |
|
20th Post |
Squarerigger![]() ![]()
![]() |
Alright Eric, after playing around, I mean spending quality time, trying to perfect this photograph, I have come on the solution. It is so obvious I don't know why I didn't think of it in the first place. Not nearly as expensive as the photoshop program. Instead of having the shopping bag be a distraction, make the shopping bag the focus of the photo. Crop out the gentleman and leave the bag. Now if I have shot at f11 instead of f3.5 the damn bag may be sharper. Don't tell me, photoshop can correct that? I won't say what my wife thinks of this idea but it can't hurt if I should come groveling for money to buy photoshop. ![]() What do you think? ![]() Attachment: Colonial Williamsburg Dec 2012 18 of 35 - Version 4.jpg (Downloaded 31 times)
____________________ -------------------------------------------- Gary |
||||||||
|
This is topic ID = 458 Current time is 22:43 | Page: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Nikon DSLR Forums > The Image Processing and Editing Forums > Gallery Comments > Comments Please continued | Top | |
Users viewing this topic |
Current theme is Modern editor
A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk Thank you. |