| Moderated by: chrisbet, | Page: 1 2 3   |
|
|||||||
| Polarized Filter - Page 1 | |
Rating: 
|
| Author | Post |
|---|
| Posted: Thu Jul 19th, 2012 20:35 |
|
1st Post |
Ric
|
Greetings, My wife and I are in Alaska visiting our son. I have been taking pictures, I am trying to be discriminating in my picture taking. I'm have taken some pictures of Mt Mckinley and the other peaks from Talkeetna. There is some haze near the mountains, but for this time of year, it's really pretty good. I am a little concerned about not being able to see the peaks as clear as I want to once downloaded. I am able to do okay with Lightroom. I am wondering if picking up a polorized filter would help. We're heading down to Seward tomorrow and there is a camera shop along the way in Anchorage that has one, but it is kind of pricey. I am willing to do it if it will help. I have no experience with this type of filter and was looking for some advice. Thank you in advance for your help, Ric
|
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Fri Jul 20th, 2012 02:13 |
|
2nd Post |
Robert
|
It's one of the few filters which can be worthwhile with digital, It should help although it may not completely eliminate the haze. Be sure to get a circular polariser not a linear, linear is said to upset the AF. Good polarisers are expensive. I just checked B&H site for a 67mm circular Polarising filter their prices range from $34 to over $250 with what I would call good ones in the $150-180 range. If you have the opportunity try a couple of different makes. Look for a window with reflections and focus on that, with a good polariser the reflections should disappear when you rotate the filter. I tried about 6 when I got mine and the difference between makes is astounding. I think mine is a B+W. Having said all that sometimes it is nice to see the diminishing haze effect as successive ranges of hills or mountains recede into the mist. It's an effect I try to get sometimes. If done right it can add depth to an image, it can help to have a nice foreground.
____________________ Robert. |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Fri Jul 20th, 2012 05:32 |
|
3rd Post |
Ric
|
Thank you, Robert. I will keep this in mind when I go into town today. Ric
|
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Fri Jul 20th, 2012 05:39 |
|
4th Post |
Ed Matusik
|
Just keep in mind Ric, that a polarizer is really a special version of a neutral density filter. You will lose some light intensity when you apply it. Having spent quite a bit of time in Alaska, I can tell you that unless you have a fast lens and a noise-free high ISO camera, you can miss (or foul up) shots if you have a polarizer in place. Just keep that in mind. - EdM
|
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Fri Jul 20th, 2012 05:59 |
|
5th Post |
Robert
|
Good point Ed, the filter may be marked with it's exposure rating, I think X2 is normal? So turn the Exposure comp up by +1 stop and watch the histogram. As an aside if you use two ND filters they can act as a variable ND filter by rotating just one of the filters.
____________________ Robert. |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Fri Jul 20th, 2012 08:03 |
|
6th Post |
Ed Matusik
|
As a P.S., I use my circular polarizer (a Tiffen) whenever I can. It's great for fall foliage shots, because it eliminates a good portion of the reflected sunlight from the leaves and consequently lets more of the colors be seen. Same with the sky colors. There were times shooting the Kodiak brown bears when the conditions would have permitted, I wished I had one mounted, but the speed of the action wouldn't let me stop shooting and screw one in place. I'd definetly get one even if you don't use it on your Alaska trip. Post some photos when you get back, and good luck and good shooting. - EdM
|
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Fri Jul 20th, 2012 10:01 |
|
7th Post |
Squarerigger
|
Robert wrote:Good point Ed, the filter may be marked with it's exposure rating, I think X2 is normal? So turn the Exposure comp up by +1 stop and watch the histogram. Since the filter is attached to the lens, wouldn't the camera's exposure system compensate for this x1 or x2? Or do you just know it may compensate too much and you want to add some exposure?
____________________ -------------------------------------------- Gary |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Fri Jul 20th, 2012 11:10 |
|
8th Post |
Robert
|
In theory, but I find it's often necessary to compensate up to 1 stop. I would expect this to be one of those situations, ALWAYS check the histogram, at least for the first few exposures and as the light changes. I generally take an exposure of grass or even my hand when I start a photo session to check the exposure.
____________________ Robert. |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Fri Jul 20th, 2012 11:20 |
|
9th Post |
Squarerigger
|
Robert wrote:In theory, but I find it's often necessary to compensate up to 1 stop. I would expect this to be one of those situations, ALWAYS check the histogram, at least for the first few exposures and as the light changes. Thanks Robert. Over time, I have become a real fan of the histogram.
____________________ -------------------------------------------- Gary |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Fri Jul 20th, 2012 11:45 |
|
10th Post |
Robert
|
To me it's the greatest invention of the DSLR, apart from free film of course!
____________________ Robert. |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| This is topic ID = 273 Current time is 03:21 | Page: 1 2 3 | |
| Nikon DSLR Forums > Camera and Lens Forums > Lenses > Polarized Filter | Top | |
Users viewing this topic |
||
Current theme is Modern editor
| A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk Thank you. |
Hosted by Octarine Services
UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0587 seconds (65% database + 35% PHP). 82 queries executed.
UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0587 seconds (65% database + 35% PHP). 82 queries executed.