This site requires new users to accept that a small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk after requesting a new account. Thank you.

 Moderated by: chrisbet, Page:    1  2  Next Page Last Page  
All Around Lens for D80   -   Page   1
 Rate Topic 
AuthorPost



Posted: Fri Jan 27th, 2017 02:43
 
1st Post
GerryZ

 

Joined: Thu Jan 26th, 2017
Location:  
Posts: 4
Status: 
Offline
Hi,

I owe a Nikon D80 and would like to upgrade my kit lens Nikkor 18-135mm for a better all around lens. I've been looking at the Nikon AF-S DX VR II Nikkor 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6G IF-ED but not sure it fits my 10 year older camera.

Can somebody confirm it does or recommend another good quality all around lens for my D80. I mostly shoot urban and nature.

Thanks

 




Posted: Fri Jan 27th, 2017 03:43
 
2nd Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4572
Status: 
Offline
Welcome to the forum.

The 18-200 will fit the D80.

Can I ask why you think this will be better than the 18-135?

Apart from the extra length it's basically the same lens...or at least the same 'stable' or generation. There have also been some queries whether an 11x zoom is a bridge too far....with some 18-200 going soft at the 200 end (some even at the 18end). Many though have been happy with their examples.

I personally subscribe to the view that you are less likely to get end effects if you keep the zoom under 10x...like your 18-135. In fact I still think the 18-105 was the best of these stablemates.

I am going to suggest that for the money you propose to spend on an 18-200 you would be better off spending on a new camera body! Here in the U.K. you can get. D5500 for the same new price as an 18-200. A D5300 or a D3000 series are even less!

Camera image quality and performance has moved on considerably since the D80....I know because I had D80 and moved on.

Unless you need more range, in which case I would look at a 70-300 FX lens to take your effective telephoto reach up to 450mm, I would upgrade the camera first.

That's my 2 cents.



____________________
Eric
 




Posted: Fri Jan 27th, 2017 04:01
 
3rd Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6987
Status: 
Offline
I have both the D80 converted for IR use and the 18-200 that you are desiring.
The 18-200 is a very good lens but is very annoying to carry on a strap as it zooms out or extends under the weight of the lens and when in extended mode is very easy to damage and bang into things.
I would swap it for a lens version that didnt do this if such a lens existed. I already have a Nikon 28-200 which is much smaller lens and it has a small switch that locks rhe lens closed, and so it is my preferred lens except that I lose the w/a portion of the zoom range.
Optically the 18-200 lens is very good.



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Fri Jan 27th, 2017 08:29
 
4th Post
GerryZ

 

Joined: Thu Jan 26th, 2017
Location:  
Posts: 4
Status: 
Offline
Thanks for your input. So with a D80, what would you recommend as the best all around lens for urban photography? I also have a 35mm and 70-300mm lenses but as you can imagine, neither provides me with the all around needs for urban photos.

 




Posted: Fri Jan 27th, 2017 08:39
 
5th Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6987
Status: 
Offline
If you are doing street photography I would say that an 18-55 VR or 18-70 is perfect as it is small and fairly unobtrusive.



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Fri Jan 27th, 2017 13:20
 
6th Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4572
Status: 
Offline
jk wrote:
If you are doing street photography I would say that an 18-55 VR or 18-70 is perfect as it is small and fairly unobtrusive.

So what's wrong with the op 18-135 for this use?



____________________
Eric
 




Posted: Sat Jan 28th, 2017 02:59
 
7th Post
jk



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6987
Status: 
Offline
That would be my thought as well. Some people would say that the 18-135 is large and obtrusive.



____________________
Still learning after all these years!
https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none
 




Posted: Sat Jan 28th, 2017 06:56
 
8th Post
Eric



Joined: Wed Apr 18th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4572
Status: 
Offline
jk wrote:
That would be my thought as well. Some people would say that the 18-135 is large and obtrusive.

I suppose it depends what 'urban' photography means in this context.

If it's taking buildings, signage and such general static objects, size doesn't matter....apart from maybe the issue of weight.

If the intention is to shoot candid people photos, then perhaps less obtrusive equipment might be an advantage.

Of course, 18mm isn't that wide. So adding a Sigma 10-20 or the like, could add another dimension.

I still think spending on a camera body would be more beneficial. o.O



____________________
Eric
 




Posted: Sat Jan 28th, 2017 07:54
 
9th Post
GerryZ

 

Joined: Thu Jan 26th, 2017
Location:  
Posts: 4
Status: 
Offline
So if the direction would be a new body, and with the experiance of a D80 with a potential upgrade, what new body would you recommend?

 




Posted: Sat Jan 28th, 2017 13:11
 
10th Post
Robert



Joined: Sun Apr 1st, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4066
Status: 
Offline
Hi Gerry, welcome to the forum.

I have a D3300 which is brilliant for less obtrusive photography, that coupled with a small fixed lens would produce image which would amaze you. It's also much better in low light than your D80 so that opens up more opportunities.

The trouble is that with the modern small SLR's you need a lens with a built in focus motor, AFS. There are quite a few good lenses but not knowing exactly what you are wanting to photograph it's hard to advise. If you use Lightroom or something similar it will probably tell you what focal lengths you are using most. That may be a good guide.

The Sigma 10-20 is a very good lens but not ideal for portraits or close up pix of people... You get very exaggerated perspective, like long noses etc.

I would have recommended trying the 45mm pancake lens but being manual that's not ideal in this case.

The D5300 or later models are little different from the D3300, except for the back screen folding out, which can be handy for candid photography because you can 'shoot from the waist' by using the screen at waist level to compose your image.

I always feel the slow, long ratio lenses are too much of a compromise and look unsightly. But that's probably just me!



____________________
Robert.

 

Reply
1st new
This is topic ID = 1408     Current time is 03:21 Page:    1  2  Next Page Last Page    
Nikon DSLR Forums > Camera and Lens Forums > Lenses > All Around Lens for D80 Top

Users viewing this topic

Post quick reply

Go to top
Go to end
Messages
Home
Recent topics
Unread posts
Last posts
Splash

Current theme is Modern editor



A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk Thank you.


Hosted by Octarine Services

UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0586 seconds (66% database + 34% PHP). 82 queries executed.