| Moderated by: chrisbet, | Page: 1 2 3   |
|
|||||||
| Image resolution - Page 1 | |
| Rate Topic |
| Author | Post |
|---|
| Posted: Sun Mar 23rd, 2025 16:59 |
|
1st Post |
Eric
|
chrisbet wrote:Lol - I didn't even notice that on first sight ..... Chris… I’ve noticed of late that images are getting quite broken up when posted on the forum pages. Has something changed with the software? I’ve always saved my images as JPEGs with minimal compression but recently the images are broken up. It’s especially noticeable with the text titling I tend to do. It’s almost as though the software is compressing a lot more. Take this old bridge image and zoom in on the wooden diagonals….there is no detail and the title txt is broken up.  Click here to comment on this image. Take a look at the clarity of the lines on this jigsaw posted last year……. https://nikondslr.uk/view_topic.php?id=1990&forum_id=29&page=4 i copied this image and reposted it below……  Click here to comment on this image. I will go back a check my settings to see if it’s something I am doing but I am not aware of changing any parameters and both were done in Photoshop. This the same original Photoshop file at high res as used last year, saved again at max quality/min compression.....  Click here to comment on this image. This is a greatly resized version saved with same jpeg settings...  Click here to comment on this image. None have the same detail as the one posted last year??????? Changed Jpeg setting to progressive ....no different....  Click here to comment on this image.
____________________ Eric |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Sun Mar 23rd, 2025 19:24 |
|
2nd Post |
chrisbet
|
Eric, Yes last Dec JK asked if large images could be auto resized because image heavy posts were taking too long to load - so the software was altered to compress those images to no more than 800 pixels wide. It's a balance between resolution and speed of download. The only compromise is to restrict the number of large images per post, then you won't notice so much that a post is taking a second or two the load the image - put in 6 images and that would be 6 to 12 seconds .... Comparing the exif of your 2 jigsaw images 7195 x 3473 px (6.1 meg) versus 386 x 800px (0.5 meg) I always prefer the high res version even if it is slower.
____________________ If it is broken it was probably me .... |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Sun Mar 23rd, 2025 21:08 |
|
3rd Post |
Eric
|
chrisbet wrote:Eric, Yes last Dec JK asked if large images could be auto resized because image heavy posts were taking too long to load - so the software was altered to compress those images to no more than 800 pixels wide. Ok I must have missed that discussion. Frankly it’s not worth posting images if they are going to be so smashed up. I think restricting photos to one per post is a better option…a discipline I would be happy to adopt.
____________________ Eric |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Mon Mar 24th, 2025 07:34 |
|
4th Post |
chrisbet
|
I could not agree more - lets try a max of two large images per post and see how it goes. I will take out the auto resize.
____________________ If it is broken it was probably me .... |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Mon Mar 24th, 2025 07:50 |
|
5th Post |
chrisbet
|
Here is your jigsaw original -
____________________ If it is broken it was probably me .... |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Mon Mar 24th, 2025 08:25 |
|
6th Post |
jk
|
Chris, On the Fuji forum that I moderate on the size limit is done as a file size (3.1MB) or 1600pixels longest side. I think this provides very good image load speeds as well as good resolution.
____________________ Still learning after all these years! https://nikondslr.uk/gallery_view.php?user=2&folderid=none |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Mon Mar 24th, 2025 08:34 |
|
7th Post |
Eric
|
jk wrote:Chris, On the Fuji forum that I moderate on the size limit is done as a file size (3.1MB) or 1600pixels longest side. Which forum is that Jonathan? Q. Is it better to size the image to exact 1600 pixels before posting an image to avoid double compression?
____________________ Eric |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Mon Mar 24th, 2025 10:35 |
|
8th Post |
chrisbet
|
Avoid double compression - just upload your original image file. The underlying server software is constantly being updated so upload speeds have increased - just upload a couple of images at a time and if the forum can load two 7 meg images in good time then we can increase the number.
____________________ If it is broken it was probably me .... |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Mon Mar 24th, 2025 10:42 |
|
9th Post |
chrisbet
|
Testing - 6.2 meg Click here to comment on this image.
____________________ If it is broken it was probably me .... |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Posted: Mon Mar 24th, 2025 10:43 |
|
10th Post |
chrisbet
|
That loaded in 0.03 secs - maybe the issue has gone away!
____________________ If it is broken it was probably me .... |
||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| This is topic ID = 2018 Current time is 19:41 | Page: 1 2 3 | |
| Nikon DSLR Forums > All about Nikon DSLR Forum > Questions about the Forum software > Image resolution | Top | |
Users viewing this topic |
||
Current theme is Modern editor
| A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikondslr.uk Thank you. |
Hosted by Octarine Services
UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0624 seconds (66% database + 34% PHP). 83 queries executed.
UltraBB 1.173 Copyright © 2008-2025 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0624 seconds (66% database + 34% PHP). 83 queries executed.